Skip to main content

Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Cytopathology and Radiology

Abstract

Primary tumors of bone are classified according to matrix production and differentiation. The internal tumor matrix is traditionally identified initially on plain radiographs with characteristic types of tumor matrices, including osteoid, chondroid, or fibroblastic. The osteoid matrix is characterized radiographically by “cloudlike” bone formation. The chondroid matrix is traditionally described as “rings and arcs.” Fibroblastic matrix is typically radiolucent on radiographs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kamide T, Nakada M, Hayashi Y, Uchiyama N, Hamada J. Intraparenchymal pneumocephalus caused by ethmoid sinus osteoma. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16:1487–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Davies AM. Primary bone tumors. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Y, Rosenberg AE. Bone-forming tumors. Surg Pathol Clin. 2017;10:513–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Levine SM, Lambiase RE, Petchprapa CN. Cortical lesions of the tibia: characteristic appearances at conventional radiography. Radiographics. 2003;23:157–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenthal DI, Hornicek FJ, Torriani M, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ. Osteoid osteoma: percutaneous treatment with radiofrequency energy. Radiology. 2003;229:171–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller SL, Hoffer FA. Malignant and benign bone tumors. Radiol Clin N Am. 2001;39:673–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Woertler K. Benign bone tumors and tumor-like lesions: value of cross-sectional imaging. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1820–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilde GE, Gakhal MS. Radiological reasoning: imaging of a talar mass. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:WS47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Venugopal SB, Prasad S. Cytological diagnosis of osteoblastoma of cervical spine: a case report with review of literature. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015;43:218–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenberg ZS, Lev S, Schmahmann S, Steiner GC, Beltran J, Present D. Osteosarcoma: subtle, rare, and misleading plain film features. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:1209–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yarmish G, Klein MJ, Landa J, Lefkowitz RA, Hwang S. Imaging characteristics of primary osteosarcoma: nonconventional subtypes. Radiographics. 2010;30:1653–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sathiyamoorthy S, Ali SZ. Osteoblastic osteosarcoma: cytomorphologic characteristics and differential diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration. Acta Cytol. 2012;56:481–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. VandenBussche CJ, Sathiyamoorthy S, Wakely PE, Ali SZ. Chondroblastic osteosarcoma: Cytomorphologic characteristics and differential diagnosis on FNA. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016;124:493–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee KC, Davies AM, Cassar-Pullicino VN. Imaging the complications of osteochondromas. Clin Radiol. 2002;57:18–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ilaslan H, Sundaram M. Advances in musculoskeletal tumor imaging. Orthop Clin North Am. 2006;37:375–91.. vii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bernard SA, Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Kransdorf MJ. Improved differentiation of benign osteochondromas from secondary chondrosarcomas with standardized measurement of cartilage cap at CT and MR imaging. Radiology. 2010;255:857–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eisenberg RL. Bubbly lesions of bone. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:W79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rybak LD, Rosenthal DI, Wittig JC. Chondroblastoma: radiofrequency ablation—alternative to surgical resection in selected cases. Radiology. 2009;251:599–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kennedy N, Demos TC, Lomasney LM. Radiologic case study. Chondroblastoma with geographic bone destruction and a sclerotic rim. Orthopedics. 2009;32:542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Papaioannou G, Sebire NJ, McHugh K. Imaging of the unusual pediatric ‘blastomas’. Cancer Imaging. 2009;9:1–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fanning CV, Sneige NS, Carrasco CH, Ayala AG, Murray JA, Raymond AK. Fine needle aspiration cytology of chondroblastoma of bone. Cancer. 1990;65:1847–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Littrell LA, Wenger DE, Wold LE, Unni KK, White LM, et al. Radiographic, CT, and MR imaging features of dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas: a retrospective review of 174 de novo cases. Radiographics. 2004;24:1397–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dodd LG. Fine-needle aspiration of chondrosarcoma. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34:413–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Koplas MC, Lefkowitz RA, Bauer TW, Joyce MJ, Ilaslan H, Landa J, et al. Imaging findings, prevalence and outcome of de novo and secondary malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone. Skelet Radiol. 2010;39:791–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanrahan CJ, Christensen CR, Crim JR. Current concepts in the evaluation of multiple myeloma with MR imaging and FDG PET/CT. Radiographics. 2010;30:127–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dimopoulos M, Terpos E, Comenzo RL, Bruno B, San Miguel J, Pérez-Simon JA, et al. International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2009;23:1545–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mahnken AH, Wildberger JE, Gehbauer G, Bruno B, San Miguel J, Pérez-Simon JA, et al. Multidetector CT of the spine in multiple myeloma: comparison with MR imaging and radiography. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1429–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Angtuaco EJ, Fassas AB, Walker R, Sethi R, Barlogie B. Multiple myeloma: clinical review and diagnostic imaging. Radiology. 2004;231:11–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Taira AV, Herfkens RJ, Gambhir SS, Quon A. Detection of bone metastases: assessment of integrated FDG PET/CT imaging. Radiology. 2007;243:204–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Algra PR, Bloem JL, Tissing H, Falke TH, Arndt JW, Verboom LJ. Detection of vertebral metastases: comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy. Radiographics. 1991;11:219–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Taoka T, Mayr NA, Lee HJ, Simonson TM, Rezai K, et al. Factors influencing visualization of vertebral metastases on MR imaging versus bone scintigraphy. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1525–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vanel D, Dromain C, Tardivon A. MRI of bone marrow disorders. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:224–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Propeck T, Bullard MA, Lin J, Doi K, Martel W. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of intraosseous lipomas. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:673–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kind M, Stock N, Coindre JM. Histology and imaging of soft tissue sarcomas. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:6–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ohguri T, Aoki T, Hisaoka M, Watanabe H, Nakamura K, Hashimoto H, et al. Differential diagnosis of benign peripheral lipoma from well-differentiated liposarcoma on MR imaging: is comparison of margins and internal characteristics useful? Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1689–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Klijanienko J, Caillaud JM, Lagacé R. Fine-needle aspiration in liposarcoma: cytohistologic correlative study including well-differentiated, myxoid, and pleomorphic variants. Diagn Cytopathol. 2004;30:307–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dodd LG, Sara Jiang X, Rao K, Bui MM. Pleomorphic liposarcoma: a cytologic study of five cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015;43:138–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Abreu E, Aubert S, Wavreille G, Gheno R, Canella C, Cotten A. Peripheral tumor and tumor-like neurogenic lesions. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:38–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Domanski HA, Akerman M, Engellau J, Gustafson P, Mertens F, Rydholm A. Fine-needle aspiration of neurilemoma (schwannoma). A clinicocytopathologic study of 116 patients. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34:403–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gupta K, Dey P, Vashisht R. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Diagn Cytopathol. 2004;31:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nishiguchi T, Mochizuki K, Ohsawa M, Inoue T, Kageyama K, Suzuki A, et al. Differentiating benign notochordal cell tumors from chordomas: radiographic features on MRI, CT, and tomography. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:644–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Farsad K, Kattapuram SV, Sacknoff R, Ono J, Nielsen GP. Sacral chordoma. Radiographics. 2009;29:1525–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Crapanzano JP, Ali SZ, Ginsberg MS, Zakowski MF. Chordoma: a cytologic study with histologic and radiologic correlation. Cancer. 2001;93:40–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Siegel HJ, Sessions W, Casillas MA, Said-Al-Naief N, Lander PH, Lopez-Ben R. Synovial sarcoma: clinicopathologic features, treatment, and prognosis. Orthopedics. 2007;30:1020–5; quiz 6–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. O’Sullivan PJ, Harris AC, Munk PL. Radiological features of synovial cell sarcoma. Br J Radiol. 2008;81:346–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ewing CA, Zakowski MF, Lin O. Monophasic synovial sarcoma: a cytologic spectrum. Diagn Cytopathol. 2004;30:19–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Morley, N., Paintal, A.S. (2020). Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors. In: Nayar, R., Lin, X., Paintal, A., Gupta, R., Nemcek Jr., A. (eds) Atlas of Cytopathology and Radiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24756-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24756-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24754-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24756-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics