Skip to main content

Joystick versus Mouse in First Person Shooters: Mouse Is Faster than Joystick

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET 2019)

Abstract

Many gamers use desktop or laptop computers with a mouse when gaming, instead of a special purpose gaming input device such as a joystick. This study compared the hitting speed and success rates of mouse and joystick for a simple first-person shooter. A between-subjects experiment with n = 22 participants using a tailor-made game task was conducted. The results show that the mouse only takes 68.8% of the time compared to the joystick in hitting targets. No significant differences were found in terms of success rate with the two methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Klochek, C., MacKenzie, I.S: Performance measures of game controllers in a three-dimensional environment. In: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2006, pp. 73–79. Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hourcade, J.P., Bederson, B.B., Druin, A., Guimbretière, F.: Differences in pointing task performance between preschool children and adults using mice. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 11(4), 357–386 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahlström, D., Hitz, M.: Revisiting PointAssist and studying effects of control-display gain on pointing performance by four-year-olds. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 257–260. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sandnes, F.E., Aubert, A.: Bimanual text entry using game controllers: relying on users’ spatial familiarity with QWERTY. Interact. Comput. 19(2), 140–150 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wobbrock, J.O., Myers, B.A., Aung, H.H., LoPresti, E.F.: Text entry from power wheelchairs: edgewrite for joysticks and touchpads. In: Proceedings of the 6th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 110–117. ACM, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baldauf, M., Fröhlich, P., Adegeye, F., Suette, S.: Investigating on-screen gamepad designs for smartphone-controlled video games. ACM Trans. Multimed. Comput. Commun. Appl. 12, Article 22 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Natapov, D., Castellucci, S.J., MacKenzie, I.S.: ISO 9241-9 evaluation of video game controllers. In: Proceedings of Graphics Interface, pp. 223–230. Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Natapov, D., MacKenzie, I.S.: The trackball controller: improving the analog stick. In: Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology, pp. 175–182. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramcharitar, A., Teather, R.J.: A Fitts’ law evaluation of video game controllers: thumbstick, touchpad and gyrosensor. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2860–2866. ACM, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geurts, L., Woensel, A.V., Abeele, V.V.: No sweat, no fun: large-gesture recognition for computer games. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Fun and Games, pp. 109–112. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nagy, G.M., Young, J.E., Anderson, J.E.: Are tangibles really better?: keyboard and joystick outperform TUIs for remote robotic locomotion control. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, pp. 41–42. ACM, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kajiyama, H., Inoue, A., Hoshi, T.: SHAPIO: shape I/O controller for video games. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 565–570. ACM, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Park, T., Lee, U., MacKenzie, S., Moon, M., Hwang, I., Song, J.: Human factors of speed-based exergame controllers. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1865–1874. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gerling, K.M., Dergousoff, K.K., Mandryk, R.L.: Is movement better?: comparing sedentary and motion-based game controls for older adults. In: Proceedings of Graphics Interface, pp. 133–140. Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, D., Cai, Z., Chen, K., Nebel, B.: A game controller based on multiple sensors. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Enterntainment Technology, pp. 375–378. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. MacKenzie, I.S., Buxton, W.: Extending Fitts’ law to two-dimensional tasks. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 219–226. ACM, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Astrup, B.K., Danielsen, V., Grønvold, K.L., Hals, A.W.I., Klophmann, A., Sandnes, F.E.: Car steering in a racing game: game controller is not better than keyboard. Manuscript in Preparation (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frode Eika Sandnes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pedersen, H., Refvik, R.F., Uy, J.S., Sandnes, F.E. (2020). Joystick versus Mouse in First Person Shooters: Mouse Is Faster than Joystick. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R., Colson, S., Choplin, A. (eds) Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies. IHIET 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25629-6_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25629-6_58

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25628-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25629-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics