Abstract
The idea of Hume’s guillotine contains the argument that one cannot derive values from facts. As intelligent systems operate with facts, Hume’s famous dilemma seems to contradict the very idea of being able to create ethical intelligent systems. In a closer look, ethics is a system of rules guiding actions. Actions always have factual or cognitive aspects, as well as evaluative or emotional aspects. Therefore, Hume’s juxtaposition of facts and norms is not well-founded. Instead of separating the facts and norms it should rather ask what kinds of facts are associated to what kinds of norms. Consequently, Hume’s guillotine sets no limits in processing ethical information, as one can combine facts and values while constructing information processes. However, intelligent machines cannot process ethical information independently of the human mind, as one cannot discuss ‘relevance’ in any formal language. Intelligent systems can be given descriptions of ethical situations and related norms, but machines cannot initiate ethical rules themselves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Saariluoma, P.: Four challenges in structuring human-autonomous systems interaction design processes. In: Williams, A.P., Sharre, P. (eds.) Autonomous Systems. NCI, The Hague (2015)
Lin, P., Jenkins, R., Abney, K.: Robot Ethics 2.0. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017)
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F.: AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds Mach. 28, 689–707 (2018)
Tegemark, M.: Life 3.0. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth (2018)
Turing, A.: On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 42, 230–65 (1936–1937)
Turing, A.: Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind LIX, 433–60 (1950)
Piper, A.: Einfuerung in die Ethik. A. Franke, Tuebingen (2007)
Moore, G.E.: Principia ethica. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)
Saariluoma, P., Cañas, J., Leikas, J.: Designing for Life. PalgraveMacmillan, London (2016)
Rolls, E.T.: Precis of the brain and emotion. Behav. Brain Sci. 23, 177–191 (2000)
Frijda, N.: The Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)
Arnold, M.: Emotions and Personality. Columbia University Press, New York (1960)
Oatley, K., Keltner, D., Jenkins, J.: Understanding Emotions. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (2007)
Habermas, J.: Diskursethik. Surkamp, Frankfurth am Main (2009)
Leikas, J., Koivisto, R., Gotcheva, N.: Ethical framework for designing autonomous systems. J. Open Innov.: Technol., Mark., Complex. Special Issue on Technology Driven Innovation, Research Management and Policy Making, 5, 18 (2019)
Saariluoma, P.: Foundational Analysis. Routledge, London (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Saariluoma, P., Leikas, J. (2020). Ethics in Designing Intelligent Systems. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R., Colson, S., Choplin, A. (eds) Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies. IHIET 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25629-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25629-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25628-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25629-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)