Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Invoking New Metropolitan Imaginaries: What Type of Metropolitan Region for What Kind of Metropolitan Planning and Governance?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Metropolitan Regions, Planning and Governance

Abstract

This chapter asks whether new metropolitan imaginaries are meaningful in any essential sense. It does this by considering the implications for metropolitan regions, planning and governance of new metropolitan (and other spatial) imaginaries. We reveal the inherent unevenness that maps of these spatial imaginaries often belie. This unevenness in institutional capacity, spatial coherence and planning competency is critical because it allows us to consider the extent to which metropolitan spatial imaginaries equate to examples of deep- or shallow-rooted regionalism. The importance we attach to this is the potential to identify those metropolitan-regional imaginaries which are likely to develop into harder institutional forms, which might remain weakly institutionalised, and which could just as easily disappear altogether. The contribution of this chapter is to examine a series of tensions—urban–rural, elites–citizens, urban–suburban, static–dynamic—and the challenges and opportunities for mobilising meaningful spatial imaginaries for planning and governing metropolitan regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Addie, J.-P. (2018). Urban(izing) university strategic planning: An analysis of London and New York City. Urban Affairs Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417753080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allmendinger, P., Chilla, T., & Sielker, F. (2014). Europeanizing territoriality—Towards soft spaces? Environment and Planning A, 46(11), 2703–2717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balducci, A., Fedeli, V., & Pasqui, G. (2011). Strategic planning for contemporary urban regions—City of cities: A project for Milan. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bang, H. P., & Sørensen, E. (1999). The everyday maker: A new challenge to democratic governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21(3), 325–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthels, L. (2018). ZukunftsLand – Regionale 2016: Innovative Formate in der Stadt- und Regionalentwicklung [Future land—Regional 2016: Potentials and perspectives of the formative urban and regional development]. Münster: Aschendorff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2013). The new science of cities. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, N. (2018). Bruxelles: Un Territoire Métropolitain à l’Etroit [Brussels: A metropolitan territory cramped]. Brussels: Permanent Center for Citizenship and Participation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blotevogel, H., & Schulze, K. (2010). 1 oder 2 oder 3? Zur konstituierung möglicher metropolregionen an Rhein und Ruhr [1 or 2 or 3? For the constitution of possible metropolitan regions along the Rhine and Ruhr]. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 68(4), 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boussauw, K., van Meeteren, M., Sansen, J., Meijers, E., Storme, T., Louw, E., et al. (2018). Planning for agglomeration economies in a polycentric region: Envisioning an efficient metropolitan core area in Flanders. European Journal of Spatial Development, 69(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1979). Civilisation Matérielle, Economie et Capitalisme, XVe-XVIIIe Siècle [Material Civilization, Economy and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century]. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2009). Restructuring, rescaling, and the urban question. Critical Planning, 16(4), 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (Ed.). (2014). Implosions/explosions: Towards a study of planetary urbanization. Berlin: Jovis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2), 182–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brotton, J. (2013). A history of the world in twelve maps. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba Martínez, C., & González, J. (2018). Bogotá: cities system and territorial organization. In D. Gómez-Álvarez, R. M. Rajack, E. López-Moreno, & G. Lanfranchi (Eds.) (2017), Steering the metropolis: Metropolitan governance for sustainable urban development (pp. 269–279). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielzyk, R., & Wood, G. (2004). Innovative strategies of political regionalization: The case of North Rhine-Westphalia. European Planning Studies, 12(2), 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi, S. (2018). Spatial imaginaries: Tyrannies or transformations? Town Planning Review, 89(2), 97–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, R., Herzog, J., Meili, M., de Meuron, P., & Schmid, C. (2013). Switzerland—An urban portrait. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, T. (2016). The making of grand Paris: Metropolitan urbanism in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fedeli, V. (2013). Idea competitions: Contemporary urban planning in urban regions and the concept of trading zones. In A. Balducci, & R. Mäntysalo (Eds.), Urban planning as a trading zone (pp. 37–55). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feiertag, P., Harrison, J., & Fedeli, V. (2020). Constructing metropolitan imaginaries: Who does this and why? In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 153–171). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galland, D., Harrison, J., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2020). What is metropolitan planning and governance for? In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 241–261). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt, L., Klemme, M., & Wiegandt, C.-C. (2014). Bürgerbeteiligung und bürgerengagement in zeiten der digital moderne – drei thesen (Citizen participation and citizen engagement in times of the digital modern—Three theses). disP—The Planning Review, 50(3), 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Álvarez, D., Rajack, R. M., López-Moreno, E., & Lanfranchi, G. (Eds.) (2017). Steering the metropolis: Metropolitan governance for sustainable urban development. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravari-Barbas, M. (2009). La «ville festive» ou construire la ville contemporaine par l’événement (The ‘festival city’: Urban events and contemporary city building). Bulletin de l’Association de Géographes Français, 86(3), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. (2013). Configuring the new ‘regional world’: On being caught between territory and networks. Regional Studies, 47(1), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., & Growe, A. (2014). When regions collide: In what sense a new ‘regional problem’?. Environment and Planning A, 46(10), 2332–2352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., & Heley, J. (2015). Governing beyond the metropolis: Placing the rural in city-region development. Urban Studies, 52(6), 1113–1133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., Fedeli, V., & Feiertag, P. (2020). Imagining the evolving spatiality of metropolitan regions. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 133–151). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., Smith, D. P., & Kinton, C. (2017). Relational regions ‘in the making’: Institutionalising new regional geographies of higher education. Regional Studies, 51(7), 1020–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2006). Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 14(4), 525–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2009). City regions and place development. Regional Studies, 43(6), 831–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2013). City regions and place development. In M. Neuman, & A. Hull (Eds.), The futures of the city region (pp. 71–84). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iammarino, S., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2019). Regional inequality in Europe: Evidence, theory and policy implications. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(2), 273–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KCAP. (2012). Brussel2040: Herover de stad! [Over the city!]. Rotterdam: KCAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, R. (2017). Suburban planet: Making the world urban from the outside in. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korzybski, A. (1941). Science and sanity: An introduction to Non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Lancaster: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G., & Jones, M. (2007). Territorial, scalar, networked, connected: In what sense a ‘regional world’? Regional Studies, 41(9), 1177–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2007). World city. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. The American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paasi, A., Harrison, J., & Jones, M. (2018). New consolidated regional geographies. In A. Paasi, J. Harrison, & M. Jones (Eds.), Handbook on the geographies of regions and territories (pp. 1–20). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parnell, S., & Robinson, J. (2013). (Re)theorizing cities from the global South: looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography, 33(4), 593–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrin, J. (2012). Next Hamburg: Bürgervisionen für eine neue Stadt [Next Hamburg. Citizen visions for a new city]. Hamburg: Körber-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, A., O’Brien, P., Strickland, T., Thrower, G., & Tomaney, J. (2019). Financialising city statecraft and infrastructure. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Provincia di Milano. (2007). Per la Città Abitabile: Scenari, Visioni, Idee, Progetto Strategico Città [For the habitable city: Scenarios, visions, ideas, strategic city project]. Milan: POLIMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, M. (2006). Urban democracy and the local trap. Urban Studies, 43(11), 1921–1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, P. S. (2017). Metropolitan governance in South Africa: eThekwini City Council. In D. Gómez-Álvarez, R. M. Rajack, E. López-Moreno, & G. Lanfranchi (Eds.), (2017), Steering the metropolis: Metropolitan governance for sustainable urban development (pp. 251–259). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, F. M. (2018). Advancing metropolitan governance in Buenos Aires. In D. Gómez-Álvarez, R. M. Rajack, E. López-Moreno, & G. Lanfranchi (Eds.), (2017), Steering the metropolis: metropolitan governance for sustainable urban development (pp. 280–289). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (2009). The 21st century metropolis: New geographies of theory. Regional Studies, 43(6), 819–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salet, W., Vermeulen, R., Savini, F., & Dembski, S. (2015). Planning for the new European metropolis: Functions, politics, and symbols. Planning Theory & Practice, 16(2), 251–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (2000). Postmetropolis. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrius, A. (1993). Territoires circulatoires et espaces urbains [Circulatory territories and urban spaces: Differentiation of migrant groups]. Les Annales de la Recherche Urbaine, 59(1), 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierstein, A. (2015). Metropolitan Regions: Functional relations between the core and the periphery. Planning Theory & Practice, 16(2), 254–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46(1), 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly. (2016). Policy Paper 4: Urban governance, capacity and international development. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, V. (2009). Seeing from the South: Refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban Studies, 46(11), 2259–2275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, V. (2014). African urban fantasies: Dreams or nightmares? Environment and Urbanization, 26(1), 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, V. (2018). The return of the city-region in the New Urban Agenda: Another global imposition on southern cities? Regional Studies Association, November 2018. https://www.regionalstudies.org/presentations/2018-winter-conference-plenary-presentations/. Accessed April 15, 2019.

  • Xu, J., & Yeh, A. (2018). Mega-city region governance and urban planning. In D. Gómez-Álvarez, R. M. Rajack, E. López-Moreno, & G. Lanfranchi (Eds.), (2017), Steering the metropolis: Metropolitan governance for sustainable urban development (pp. 140–154). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy

    Valeria Fedeli

  2. Dortmund Technical University, Dortmund, Germany

    Patricia Feiertag

  3. Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

    John Harrison

Authors
  1. Valeria Fedeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patricia Feiertag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John Harrison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valeria Fedeli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technical University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany

    Karsten Zimmermann

  2. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway

    Daniel Galland

  3. Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

    John Harrison

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fedeli, V., Feiertag, P., Harrison, J. (2020). Invoking New Metropolitan Imaginaries: What Type of Metropolitan Region for What Kind of Metropolitan Planning and Governance?. In: Zimmermann, K., Galland, D., Harrison, J. (eds) Metropolitan Regions, Planning and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25632-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation