Skip to main content

The Role of the Reward Recognition Network in Therapy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Therapy and the Neural Network Model

Abstract

Human behavior is generally guided by the anticipation of potential outcomes that are considered to be rewarding. Abnormalities in reward processes are striking and obvious across a variety of mental health issues and may precede the development of psychopathology. There is strong behavioral and physiological evidence that the brain both represents probability distributions and performs probabilistic inference on a continuous basis. Models based on this process are used to describe how the brain selects a course of action from among a group of actions where the known outcome is in some ways uncertain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alloy, L., & Abramson, L. T. (2010). The role of the Behavioral Approach System (BAS) in bipolar spectrum disorders. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 189–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavedini, P., Gorini, A., & Bellodi, L. (2006). Understanding obsessive–compulsive disorder: Focus on decision making. Neuropsychology Review, 16(1), 1040–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-006-9001-y.

  • Diederich, K., & Koch, M. (2005). Role of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in sensorimotor gating and reward-related behavior in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl)., 179(2), 402–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.010.

  • Eldar, E., Rutledge, R., Dolan, R., & Niv, Y. (2015). Mood as representation of momentum. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.010.

  • Garcia-Rill, E. (1991). The pedunculopontine nucleus. Progress in Neurobiology, 36(5), 363–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorwood, P. (2008). Neurobiological mechanisms of anhedonia. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, D., Weiss, T., & Chapman, G. (2007). The format in which uncertainty information is presented affects decision biases. Psychological Science, 18(3), 240–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, S., & Knutson, B. (2010). The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imagery. Neuropshycopharmacology, 35(1), 4–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, G., Leung, B. K., & Balleine, B. W. (2014). Dorsal and ventral streams: The distinct role of striatal sub-regions in the acquisition and performance of goal-directed actions. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 108, 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2013.11.00.

  • Insel, T. (2013, April 29). Directors blog: Transforming diagnosis. Retrieved from National Institute of Mental Health from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/2013/transforming-diagnosis.shtml.

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica., 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kal, B., Case, J., Freed, R., Stern, E., & Gabbay, V. (2017). Neural correlates of RDoC reward constructs in adolescents with diverse psychiatric symptoms: A Reward Flanker Task pilot study. Journal of Affect Disorders, 216, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.11.042.

  • Koziol, L. F., & Budding, D. E. (2009). Subcortical structures and cognition: Implications for neuropsychological assessment. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusev, P., & van Schaik, P. (2011, November). Preferences under risk: content-dependent behavior and psychological. Frontiers in Psychology, 15(2), 269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00269.

  • Leathers, M., & Olson, C. (2012). In monkeys making value-based decisions, LIP neurons encode cue salience and not action value. Science, 338(6103), 132–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinty, V., Hayden, B., Heilbronner, S., Dumont, E., Graves, S., Mirrione, M., … Haber, S. (2011, November 20). Emerging, reemerging, and forgotten brain areas of the reward circuit: Notes from the 2010 motivational and neural networks conference. Behav Brain Research, 225, 348–357. Retrieved from National Institute of Health https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.07.036.

  • Morris, R., Griffiths, O., Le Pelley, M., & Weickert, T. (2013). Attention to irrelevant cues is related to positive symptoms in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 575–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, K. (2010). A dual system model of preferences under risk. Pyschological Review, 117, 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017884.

  • Nestler, E. (2014). Epigenetic mechanisms of drug addiction. Neuropharmacology, 259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nusslock, R., & Alloy, L. (2017). Reward processing and mood-related symptoms: An RDoC and reward processing and mood-related symptoms: An RDoC and. Journal of Affective Disorders, 3–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.001.

  • Nusslock, R., & Miller, G. (2016). Early-life adversity and physical and emotional health across the lifespan: A neuro-immune network hypothesis. Biological Psychiatry, 80, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, M., & Yu, A. (2012, September). Emotion and decision-making: Affect-driven belief systems in anxiety and depression. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16(9), 476–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzagalli, D., Iosifescu, D., Hallett, L., Ratner, K., & Favab, M. (2008, November). Reduced hedonic capacity in major depressive disorder: Evidence from a probabilistic reward task. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.03.001.

  • Pochon, J., Levy, R., Fossati, P., Lehericy, S., Poline, J. P., Le Bihan, D., & Dubois, B. (2002). The neural system that bridges reward and cognition in humans: an fMRI study. PNAS, 5669–5674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouget, A., Beck, J., Ma, W., & Latham, P. (2013, September). Probabilistic brains: Knowns and unknowns. Nature Neuroscience, 16(9), 1170–1178. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3495.

  • Rademacher, L., Krach, S., Kohls, F., Irmak, A., Gründera, G., & Spreckelmeyera, K. (2010, 15 February). Dissociation of neural networks for anticipation and consumption of monetary and social rewards. NeuroImage 49(4), 3276–3265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.089.

  • Scheres, A., Dijkstra, M., Ainslie, E., Balkan, J. R., Sonuga, B. E., & Castellanos, F. (2006). Temporal and probabilistic discounting of rewards in children and adolescents: Effects of age and ADHD symptoms. Neuropsychologia 44, 2092–2103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.012.

  • Schultz, W. (2015). Neuronal reward and decision signals: From theories to data. Physiological Review, 95(3), 853–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seger, C., & Cincotta, C. (2005, March 16). The roles of the caudate nucleus in human classification learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(11), 2941–2951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirigu, S., & Duhamel, J. (2016, March). Reward and decision processes in the brains of humans and nonhuman primates. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 18(1), 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taha, S., & Fields, H. (2006, January 4). Inhibitions of nucleus accumbens neurons encode a gating signal for reward-directed behavior. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(1), 217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. N. (2018). Handbook of clinical neurology. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodore Wasserman .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wasserman, T., Wasserman, L.D. (2019). The Role of the Reward Recognition Network in Therapy. In: Therapy and the Neural Network Model. Neural Network Model: Applications and Implications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26921-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics