Skip to main content

Overview of eRisk 2019 Early Risk Prediction on the Internet

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction (CLEF 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11696))

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of eRisk 2019, the third edition of this lab under the CLEF conference. The main purpose of eRisk is to explore issues of evaluation methodology, effectiveness metrics and other processes related to early risk detection. Early detection technologies can be employed in different areas, particularly those related to health and safety. This edition of eRisk had three tasks. Two of them shared the same format and focused on early detecting signs of depression (T1) or self-harm (T2). The third task focused on an innovative challenge related to automatically filling a depression questionnaire based on user interactions in social media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    However, following the extraction method suggested by Coppersmith and colleagues [2], the post discussing the diagnosis was removed from the collection.

  2. 2.

    More information about the server can be found on the lab website http://early.irlab.org/server.html.

  3. 3.

    Observe that Sadeque et al. (see [6], p. 497) computed the latency for all users such that \(g_u=1\). We argue that latency should be computed only for the true positives. The false negatives (\(g_u=1\), \(d_u=0\)) are not detected by the system and, therefore, they would not generate an alert.

  4. 4.

    Again, we adopt Sadeque et al.’s proposal but we estimate latency only over the true positives.

  5. 5.

    In the eRisk 2017 collection this led to setting p to 0.0078.

  6. 6.

    Slightly less than 25% because a couple of questions have more than four possible answers.

References

  1. Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., Erbaugh, J.: An inventory for measuring depression. JAMA Psychiatry 4(6), 561–571 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Coppersmith, G., Dredze, M., Harman, C.: Quantifying mental health signals in Twitter. In: ACL Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Losada, D.E., Crestani, F.: A test collection for research on depression and language use. In: Fuhr, N., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2016. LNCS, vol. 9822, pp. 28–39. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44564-9_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Losada, D.E., Crestani, F., Parapar, J.: eRISK 2017: CLEF lab on early risk prediction on the internet: experimental foundations. In: Jones, G.J.F., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2017. LNCS, vol. 10456, pp. 346–360. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65813-1_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Losada, D.E., Crestani, F., Parapar, J.: Overview of eRisk: early risk prediction on the internet. In: Bellot, P., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2018. LNCS, vol. 11018, pp. 343–361. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98932-7_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Sadeque, F., Xu, D., Bethard, S.: Measuring the latency of depression detection in social media. In: WSDM, pp. 495–503. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Trotzek, M., Koitka, S., Friedrich, C.M.: Utilizing neural networks and linguistic metadata for early detection of depression indications in text sequences. CoRR abs/1804.07000 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the support obtained from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) under the project “Early risk prediction on the Internet: an evaluation corpus”, 2015.

We also thank the financial support obtained from the (i) “Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades” of the Government of Spain (research grants RTI2018-093336-B-C21 and RTI2018-093336-B-C22), (ii) “Consellerí­a de Educación, Universidade e Formación Profesional”, Xunta de Galicia (grants ED431C 2018/29, ED431G/08 and ED431G/01 – “Centro singular de investigación de Galicia” –). All grants were co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF/FEDER program).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E. Losada .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Losada, D.E., Crestani, F., Parapar, J. (2019). Overview of eRisk 2019 Early Risk Prediction on the Internet. In: Crestani, F., et al. Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction. CLEF 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11696. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28577-7_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28577-7_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28576-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28577-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics