Skip to main content

Preventing Complications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gastric Bypass

Abstract

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the bariatric surgical technique of choice, but also it is difficult to perform, requiring a long and demanding learning curve. The possible post-operative complications are, frequently, a consequence of adverse intraoperative events (AIEs) or inadequate surgical manoeuvres. In this chapter, the most accurate technical details to prevent post-operative complications are evaluated.

Any kind of trocar insertion can deserve injuries to great vessels, visceral, solid organs or abdominal wall. To prevent them, it is recommended to introduce the first trocar directed to the patient’s left side of the upper abdomen and to check the sites at the end of surgery. Post-operative haemorrhage, intra- or extraluminal, is prevented by carefully looking for bleeding points, by using the adequate stapler cartridge and reinforcing it, if necessary. Anastomotic stenosis, above all at the gastrojejunostomy, is more frequent with 21 mm circular-stapler or handsewn suture, being less likely with linear stapler as well as using reabsorbable and monofilament sutures. Great attention must be paid to avoid the “Roux-en-O”, the kinking of the limb and the trapping of the oro- or nasogastric tube, as well as to control staplers’ management to prevent their failures and to resolve them. Passing the alimentary limb antecolic and antegastric, with its tip oriented to the patient’s left and with a anti-clockwise alimentary limb position at the jejunojejunal anastomosis, besides closing mesenteric and Petersen’s defects, is the most suitable manoeuvre to prevent internal hernias.

In summary, close attention to technical details and laparoscopic surgical manoeuvres, using delicate and precise surgical instruments, besides surgeon’s experience and skilfulness, based on a tutorized learning, are the best preventive measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stenberg E, Szabo E, Agren G, et al. Early complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Ann Surg. 2014;260(6):1040–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shin RB. Evaluation of the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:91–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Hamad G, et al. The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:212–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oliak D, Ballantyne GH, Weber P, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. defining the learning curve Surg Endosc. 2003;17:405–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Kadre L, Tinoco AC, Tinoco RC, et al. Overcoming the learning curve of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a 12-year experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(6):867–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cruz Vigo JL, Cruz Vigo F, Sanz de la Morena P, Canga Presa JM. By-pass gastrique “bandé” par laparoscopie. Technique et résultats des 400 premiers cas. Le Jour de Celio-chir. 2004;50:26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rausa E, Bonavina L, Asti E, et al. Rate of death and complications in laparoscopic and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis on 69,494 patients. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1956–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenstein AJ, Wahed AS, Adenji A. Prevalence of adverse intraoperative events during obesity surgery and their sequelae. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(2):271–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kassir R, Blanc P, Lointier P, et al. Laparoscopic entry techniques in obese patient: Veress needle, direct trocar insertion or open entry technique? Obes Surg. 2014;24:2193–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sundbom M, Hedberg J, Wanhainen A, et al. Aortic injuries during laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity in Sweden 2009–2010: a nationwide survey. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(2):203–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sundbom M, Ottosson J. Trocar injuries in 17.446 laparoscopic gastric bypass – a nationwide survey from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2127–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kosuta M, Palmisano S, Piccinni G, et al. Safety of Veress needle insertion in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24(1):e1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ertugrul I, Kayaalp C, Yagci MA, et al. Comparison of direct trocar entry and Veress needle entry in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: randomized controlled trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25(11):875–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sabeti N, Tarnoff M, Kim J, et al. Primary midline peritoneal access with optical trocar is safe and effective in morbidly obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(5):610–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bernante P, Foletto M, Toniato A. Creation of pneumoperitoneum using a bladed optical trocar in morbidly obese patients: technique and results. Obes Surg. 2008;18(8):1043–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenthal RJ, Szomstein S, Kennedy CI, et al. Direct visual insertion of primary trocar and avoidance of fascial closure with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(1):124–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson WH, Fecher AM, McMahon RL, et al. VersaStep trocar hernia rate in unclosed fascial defects in bariatric patients. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(10):1584–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pring CM. Aortic injury using the Hasson trocar: a case report and review of the literature. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89(2):W3–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Moreno-Egea A. How to prevent trocar-site hernia? A totally atraumatic endoscopic mini-IPOM-plug technique (with extra-lightweight titanium-coated mesh and glue). Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015;25(3):106–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen NT, Wolfe BM. Hypopharyngeal perforation during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2000;10:64–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chan D, Bishoff JT, Ratner L, et al. Endovascular gastrointestinal stapler device malfunction during laparoscopic nephrectomy: early recognition and management. J Urol. 2000;164:319–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Deng DY, Meng MV, Nguyen HT, et al. Laparoscopic linear cutting stapler failure. Urology. 2002;60(3):415–9; discussion 419–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kwazneski D, Six C, Stahlfeld K. The unacknowledged incidence of laparoscopic stapler malfunction. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Higa K, Boone K, Ho T. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients. Arch Surg. 2000;135:1029–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen NT, Rivers R, Wolfe BM. Early gastrointestinal haemorrhage after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2003;13:62–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T. Complications of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 1,040 patients what have we learned? Obes Surg. 2000;10(6):509–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Heneghan HM, Meron-Eldar S, Yenumula P, et al. Incidence and management of bleeding complications after gastric bypass surgery in the morbidly obese. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(6):729–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mehran A, Szomstein S, Zundel N, et al. Management of acute bleeding after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2003;13:842–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mourelo R, Kaidar-Person O, Fajnwaks P, et al. Haemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications after bariatric surgery in patients receiving chronic anticoagulation therapy. Obes Surg. 2008;18(2):167–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dick A, Byrne TK, Baker M, et al. Gastrointestinal bleeding after gastric bypass surgery: nuisance or catastrophe? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(6):643–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Murphy K, McCracken JD, Ozment KL. Gastric bypass for obesity. Am J Surg. 1980;140:747–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Podnos YD, Jimenez JC, Wilson SE, et al. Complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Arch Surg. 2003;138:957–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Papp A, Vereczkei LJ, et al. The effect of different levels of peritoneal CO2 pressure on bleeding time of spleen capsule injury. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1125–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sajid MS, Khatri K, Singh K, et al. Use of staple-line reinforcement in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2884–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Madan AK, Martinez JM, Lo Menzo E, et al. Omental reinforcement for intraoperative leak repairs during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am Surg. 2009;75:839–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Steffen R. Early gastrointestinal haemorrhage after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2003;13:466–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Van Wezenbeek MR, Van Oudheusden TR, Smulders JF, et al. Transection versus preservation of the neurovascular bundle of the lesser omentum in primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:283–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Perathoner A, Weiss H, Santner W, et al. Vagal nerve dissection during pouch formation in laparoscopic Roux-Y-gastric bypass for technical simplification: does it matter? Obes Surg. 2009;19:412–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Frantzides CT, Carlson MA, Shostrom VK, et al. A survey of dumping symptomatology after gastric bypass with or without lesser omental transection. Obes Surg. 2011;21:186–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sanchez BS, Safadi BY, Kieran JA, et al. Orogastric tube complications in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2006;16(4):443–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Abu-Gazala S, Donchin Y, Keidar A. Nasogastric tube, temperature probe, and bougie stapling during bariatric surgery: a multicenter survey. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(5):595–600; discussion 600–1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Higa G, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R. Stapling of orogastric tube during gastrojejunal anastomosis: an unusual complication after conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):116–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Campillo-Soto A, Torralba-Martínez JA, Martín-Lorenzo JG, et al. Gastrojejunal anastomosis stricture after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Our experience with 62 patients. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2010;102:187–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vasquez JC, Wayne Overby D, Farrell TM. Fewer gastrojejunostomy strictures and marginal ulcers with absorbable suture. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2011–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ruiz de Adana JC, Hernández Matías A, Hernández Bartolomé M, et al. Risk of gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture with multifilament an monofilament sutures after hand-sewn laparoscopic gastric bypass: a prospective cohort study. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1274–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wittgrove AC, Clark GW. Combined laparoscopic/endoscopic anvil placement for the performance of the gastroenterostomy. Obes Surg. 2001;11(5):565–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Himpens JM. The gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2004;11(3):171–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gonzalez R, Lin E, Venkatesh KR, et al. Gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of 3 techniques. Arch Surg. 2003;138:181–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nguyen NT, Stevens CM, Wolfe BM. Incidence and outcome of anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7(8):997–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Suggs WJ, Kouli W, Lupovici M, et al. Complications at gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparison between 21- and 25-mm circular staplers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:508–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Fischer BL, Atkinson JD, Cottam D. Incidence of gastroenterostomy stenosis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using 21- or 25-mm circular stapler: a randomized prospective blinded study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:176–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Baccaro LM, Vunnamadala K, Sakharpe A, et al. Stricture rate after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a 21-mm circular stapler versus a 25-mm linear stapler. Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2015;10:33–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Markar SR, Penna M, Venkat-Ramen V, et al. Influence of circular stapler diameter on postoperative stenosis after laparoscopic gastrojejunal anastomosis in morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:230–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Frutos MD, Luján J, García A, et al. Gastrojejunal anastomotic stenosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass with a circular stapler (21 mm): incidence, treatment and long term follow-up. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1631–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Williams MD, Champion JK. Linear technique of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Technol Int. 2004;13:101–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Hamad G, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: current technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2003;13:229–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Penna M, Markar SR, Venkat-raman V, et al. Linear-stapled versus circular-stapled laparoscopic gastrojejunal anastomosis in morbid obesity: meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:95–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Carrodeguas L, Szomstein S, Zundel N, et al. Gastrojejunal anastomotic strictures following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric by- pass surgery: analysis of 1291 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2:92–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Mueller CL, Jackson TD, Swanson T, et al. Linear-stapled Gastrojejunostomy with transverse hand-sewn enterotomy closure significantly reduces strictures for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1302–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. de-la-Cruz-Vigo F, de-la-Cruz-Vigo JL. Stenosis in gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2010;102:151–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Cruz Vigo F, Cruz Vigo JL. La obesidad: problema del siglo XXI. En: Cruz Vigo F, Cruz Vigo JL, editores. Bypass gástrico por laparoscopia. Cáceres: Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión; 2005. pp. 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Yimcharoen P, Heneghan H, Chand B, et al. Successful management of gastrojejunal strictures after gastric bypass: is timing important? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:151–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Awad S, Aguilo R, Agrawal S, et al. Outcomes of linear-stapled versus hand-sewn gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic Roux en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2278–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Espinel J, De-la-Cruz JL, Pinedo E, et al. Stenosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass: management by endoscopic dilation without fluoroscopic guidance. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011;103:508–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Caro L, Sanchez C, Rodriguez P, Bosch J. Endoscopic balloon dilation of anastomotic strictures occurring after laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Dig Dis. 2008;26:314–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ribeiro-Parenti L, Arapis K, Chosidow D, et al. Gastrojejunostomy stricture rate: comparison between antecolic and retrocolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:1076–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Cruz Vigo JL, Cruz Vigo F, Sanz de la Morena P, et al. Consideraciones técnicas para minimizar las complicaciones. Cir Esp. 2004;75:292–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. De Moura EG, Orso IR, Aurélio EF, et al. Factors associated with complications or failure of endoscopic balloon dilation of anastomotic stricture secondary to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(3):582–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Campos JM, Ferreira Filho HA, Galvao Neto MP, et al. Estenosis de la anastomosis gastroyeyunal. En: Campos JM, Galvao Neto MP, Moura EGH, editores. Endoscopia en cirugía de la obesidad. Caracas: Amolca; 2009. pp. 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Abellán I, López V, Lujan J, et al. Stapling versus hand suture for gastroenteric anastomosis in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a randomized clinical trial. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1796–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Giordano S, Salminen P, Biancari F, et al. Linear stapler technique may be safer than circular in gastrojejunal anastomosis for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1958–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lee S, Davies AR, Bahal S, et al. Comparison of gastrojejunal anastomosis techniques in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: gastrojejunal stricture rate and effect on subsequent weight loss. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1425–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Jiang HP, Lin LL, Jiang X, et al. Meta-analysis of hand-sewn versus mechanical gastrojejunal anastomosis during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Int J Surg. 2016;32:150–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Espinel J, Pinedo E. Stenosis in gastric bypass: endoscopic management. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;4:290–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Ukleja A, Afonso BB, Pimentel R, et al. Outcome of endoscopic balloon dilation of strictures after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(8):1746–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Sherman V, Dan AG, Lord JM, et al. Complications of gastric bypass: avoiding the Roux-en-O configuration. Obes Surg. 2009;19(8):1190–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Higa K, Ho T, Tercero F, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 10 years’ follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:516–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Hwang RF, Swartz DE, Felix EL. Causes of small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1631–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Champion JK, Williams M. Small bowel obstruction and internal hernias after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obs Surg. 2003;13:596–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Higa KD, Ho T, Boone KB. Internal hernias after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: incidence, treatment and prevention. Obes Surg. 2003;13:350–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Wittgrove AC, Endres JE, Davis M, et al. Perioperative complications in a single surgeon’s experience with 1000 consecutive laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operations for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 2002;12:457–8(abst L4).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Steele KE, Prokopowicz GP, Magnuson T, et al. Laparoscopic antecolic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with closure of internal defects leads to fewer internal hernias than the retrocolic approach. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(9):2056–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Quebbemann BB, Dallal RM. The orientation of the antecolic Roux limb markedly affects the incidence of internal hernias after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15:766–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Nandipati KC, Lin E, Husain F, et al. Counter clockwise rotation of Roux-en-Y limb significantly reduces internal herniation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:675–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Brolin RE. The antiobstruction stitch in stapled Roux-en-Y enteroenterostomy. Am J Surg. 1995;169:355–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Olbers T, Lonroth H, Fagevik-Olsen M, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass: development of technique, respiratory function, and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2003;13:364–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Stenberg E, Szabo E, Ågren G, et al. Closure of mesenteric defects in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1397–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de la Cruz Vigo, F., de la Cruz Vigo, J.l., Cuéllar, E.R., Rodríguez, P.G., Presa, J.M.C. (2020). Preventing Complications. In: Ettinger, J., et al. Gastric Bypass. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28803-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28803-7_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28802-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28803-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics