Skip to main content

Turbines Allocation Optimization in Hydro Plants via Computational Intelligence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems and Applications (IntelliSys 2019)

Abstract

In the last decades, due to environmental concerns and the decentralization of the electrical systems around the world, the share of Hydroelectric Power Plants (HPP) in the electricity matrix has grown year by year. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the operational planning of the hydro plants to schedule the optimum number of turbines on operation on a daily planning horizon aiming at supplying the generation goals at the lowest possible cost. The main goal of this work is to evaluate and compare the performance of two recent computational intelligence techniques, Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) and the Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA), on obtaining the optimized dispatch of hydro plants regarding the Turbine Allocation Planning (TAP) problem. Mathematically, TAP is classified as a multimodal non-linear problem with mixed-integer variables. In order to test the aforementioned metaheuristic techniques, one HPP composed of five turbines on a 24-h planning horizon was considered. The results point to a better performance of the GWO technique on the HPP daily operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The detailed HPP data used in all simulations presented here, such as efficiency curves and plant parameters, can be consulted at http://bit.ly/HPPdata.

  2. 2.

    All tests were performed using Matlab R2016a on a standard computer with the following characteristics: Intel® Core i3 CPU M 350 @ 2.27 GHz; 4 GB of RAM using Windows 7 Pro 64 bits.

References

  1. Terry, L.A., Pereira, M.V.F., Neto, T.A.A., Silva, L.F.A., Sales, P.R.H.: Brazilian national hydrothermal electrical generating system. Interfaces 16, 16–38 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kazemi, S., Motamedi, S., Sharifian, S.: A home energy management system using Gray Wolf Optimizer in smart grids. In: 2017 2nd Conference on Swarm Intelligence and Evolutionary Computation (CSIEC), Kerman, pp. 159–164 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Albina, K., Lee, S.G.: Hybrid stochastic exploration using grey wolf optimizer and coordinated multi-robot exploration algorithms. IEEE Access 7, 14246–14255 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dzung, P.Q., Tien, N.T., Dinh Tuyen, N., Lee, H.: Selective harmonic elimination for cascaded multilevel inverters using Grey Wolf Optimizer algorithm. In: 2015 9th International Conference on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia (ICPE-ECCE Asia), Seoul, pp. 2776–2781 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chaman-Motlagh, A.: Superdefect photonic crystal filter optimization using grey wolf optimizer. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27(22), 2355–2358 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abdel-Fatah, S., Ebeed, M., Kamel, S.: Optimal reactive power dispatch using modified sine cosine algorithm. In: 2019 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Computer Engineering (ITCE), Aswan, Egypt, pp. 510–514 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Laouamer, M., Kouzou, A., Mohammedi, R.D., Tlemçani, A.: Optimal PMU placement in power grid using sine cosine algorithm. In: 2018 International Conference on Applied Smart Systems (ICASS), Medea, Algeria, pp. 1–5 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hamdan, S., Binkhatim, S., Jarndal, A., Alsyouf, I.: On the performance of artificial neural network with sine-cosine algorithm in forecasting electricity load demand. In: 2017 International Conference on Electrical and Computing Technologies and Applications (ICECTA), Ras Al Khaimah, pp. 1–5 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Banerjee, A., Nabi, M.: Re-entry trajectory optimization for space shuttle using Sine-Cosine Algorithm. In: 2017 8th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), Istanbul, pp. 73–77 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Finardi, E.C., Takigawa, F.Y.K., Brito, B.H.: Assessing solution quality and computational performance in the hydro unit commitment problem considering different mathematical programming approaches. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 136, 212e22 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nilsson, O., Soder, L., Sjelvgren, D.: Integer modeling of spinning reserve requirements in short term scheduling. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 13(3), 959–964 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Encina, A., Ohishi, T., Soares, S., Cicogna, M.: Unit commitment of hydro dominated systems. Int. J. Emerg. Electr. Power Syst. 9(4) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bortoni, E.C., Bastos, G.S., Souza, L.E.: Optimal load distribution between units in a power plant. SA Trans. 46, 533–539 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Breton, M., Hachem, S., Hammadia, A.: A decomposition approach for the solution of the unit loading problem in hydroplants. Automatica 38, 477–485 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Encina, A., Ohishi, T., Soares, S.: Optimal dispatch of generating units of the Itaipu hydroelectric plant. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 17(1), 154–158 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Villasanti, C., Lucken, C.V., Barán, B.: Dispatch of hydroelectric generating units using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. In: IEEE/PES Transmission & Distribution Conference & Exposition: Latin America. [S.l.: s.n.], pp. 929–934 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Khatami, S., Breadner, J., Meech, J.A.: Unit commitment for BC-hydro’s mica dam generating plant using a genetic algorithm approach. In: 3rd International Conference on IPMM, Richmond (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fernandes, J.P.T., Correia, P.B., Hidalgo, I.G., Colnago, G.R.: A genetic algorithm solution for optimization of the power generation potential in hydroelectric plants. In: 2013 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Cancun, pp. 2504–2511 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mirjalili, S.: SCA: a Sine Cosine Algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowl. Based Syst. 96, 120–133 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S.M., Lewis, A.: Grey wolf optimizer. Adv. Eng. Softw. 69, 46–61 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the support of the Electrical Engineering Postgraduate Program (PPEE) of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), INESC TEC and INERGE. The development presented in this article came from the ANEEL R&D project (PD-00673-0052/2018) financed by EDP. The authors thank ANEEL and the technicians of all the companies involved.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramon Abritta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abritta, R., Panoeiro, F.F., da Silva Junior, I.C., Marcato, A.L.M., de Mello Honório, L., de Oliveira, L.E. (2020). Turbines Allocation Optimization in Hydro Plants via Computational Intelligence. In: Bi, Y., Bhatia, R., Kapoor, S. (eds) Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1037. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29516-5_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics