Skip to main content

Combination in Dempster-Shafer Theory Based on a Disagreement Factor Between Evidences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2019)

Abstract

There exist many rules to combine the available pieces of information in Dempster-Shafer theory of Evidence (DST). The first one of them was the Dempster’s rule of combination (DRC), which has some known drawbacks. In the literature, many rules have tried to solve the problems founds on DRC but normally they have other non-desirable behaviors too. In this paper, it is proposed a set of mathematical properties that a rule of that type should verify; it is analyzed some of the most used alternatives to the DRC including some of the last hybrid rules, via their properties and behaviors; and it is presented a new hybrid rule that satisfies an important set of properties and does not suffer from the counterintuitive behaviors of other rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this work we consider that the sources of information are independent, which is not always true in the reality.

  2. 2.

    If we have the aim to use these rules in applications, other property could be added about the complexity of the rule that allows us to use it easily.

References

  1. Abellán, J.: Combining nonspecificity measures in Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 40(6), 611–622 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Abellán, J., Castellano, J.G., Moral-García, S., Mantas, C.J., Benítez, M.D.: A decision support tool for credit domains: Bayesian network with a variable selector based on imprecise probabilities. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Making (2017, submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abellán, J., Klir, G., Moral, S.: Disaggregated total uncertainty measure for credal sets. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 35(1), 29–44 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38(2), 325–339 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Combination and propagation of uncertainty with belief functions: a reexamination. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1, IJCAI 1985, pp. 111–113. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: On the combination of evidence in various mathematical frameworks. In: Flamm, J., Luisi, T. (eds.) Reliability Data Collection and Analysis. EURR, vol. 3, pp. 213–241. Springer, Dordrecht (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2438-6_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Dymova, L., Sevastjanov, P., Tkacz, K., Cheherava, T.: A new measure of conflict and hybrid combination rules in the evidence theory. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8468, pp. 411–422. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07176-3_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Klir, G.J.: Uncertainty and Information: Foundations of Generalized Information Theory. Wiley, Hoboken (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Murphy, C.K.: Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. Decis. Support Syst. 29(1), 1–9 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Yager, R.R.: On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules. Inf. Sci. 41(2), 93–137 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Zadeh, L.A.: Review of a mathematical theory of evidence. AI Mag. 5(3), 81–83 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Spanish “Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad” and by “Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional” (FEDER) under Project TEC2015-69496-R.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serafín Moral-García .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abellán, J., Moral-García, S., Benítez, M.D. (2019). Combination in Dempster-Shafer Theory Based on a Disagreement Factor Between Evidences. In: Kern-Isberner, G., Ognjanović, Z. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11726. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29764-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29765-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics