Skip to main content

Reflections on Social Simulation and Complexity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Progress in Artificial Intelligence (EPIA 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11805))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1612 Accesses

Abstract

After the involvement with a huge collection of case studies, where the experimentation may distinguish between luck and skill, our motivation was directed to see how agent-based modeling and model thinking were applied to general problem solving and case studies on complexity. Also, the development of models was directed to show the efficacy of diversity in attacking new scenarios and landscapes. And, even we avoided often Nassim Taleb’s mantra, “we tend to learn the overall precise and not the general”, the desire was to get realism (avoid embellished depiction of nature and behavior). This direction of research forced our attention upon the calibration of parameters, the validation, the use of mechanisms, the use of big data, and the activity of scaling up to check the plausibility of the outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lemos, C.M., Coelho, H., Lopes, R.J.: ProtestLab: a computational laboratory for studying street protests. In: Nemiche, M., Essaaidi, M. (eds.) Advances in Complex Societal, Environmental and Engineered Systems. NSC, vol. 18, pp. 3–29. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46164-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K.G.: Simulation for the Social Scientist. Open University Press, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thiele, J.C., Kurth, W., Grimm, V.: Facilitating parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis of agent-based models: a cookbook using NetLogo and R. JASSS 17(3), 11 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lemos, C., Lopes, R.J., Coelho, H.: On legitimacy feedback mechanisms in agent-based modelling of civil violence. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 31(2), 106–127 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lemos, C., Lopes, R.J., Coelho, H.: Quantitative measures of crowd patterns in agent-based models of street protests. In: IEEE Xplore Digital Library, Best Paper, IEEE 3rd World Conference on Complex Systems (WCCS15), Marrakech (Marocco), pp. 23–25, November 2015

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lemos, C., Lopes, R.J., Coelho, H.: Analysis of the decision rule in Epstein’s agent-based model of civil violence. In: IEEE Xplore Digital Library, IEEE 3rd World Conference on Complex Systems (WCCS15), Marrakech (Marocco), pp. 23–25. Best Paper Award, November 2015

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grimm, V., Railsback, S.F.: Individual-based Modeling and Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Page, S.F.: The Model Thinker: What You Need to Make Data Work for You. Basic Books, New York (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Grimm, V., Berger, U., DeAngelis, D.L., Polhill, J.G., Giske, J., Railsback, S.F.: The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecol. Model. 221(23), 2760–2768 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Epstein, J.M.: Why model? JASSS 11(4), 12 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Epstein, J.M.: Agent_Zero, Toward Neurocognitive for Generative Social Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt, B.: Modelling human behavior, the pecs reference manual. In: Verbraeck, A., Krug, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th European Simulation Symposium, SCS Europe BVBA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Still, G.K.: Introduction to Crowd Science. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Galesic, M., de Bruin, W.B., Dumas, M., Kapteyn, A., Darling, J., Meijer, E.: Asking about social circles improves election predictions. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2(3), 187 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pineau, J.: Reproducible, reusable and robust. In: YouTube Invited Talk December 14, Invited Talk at the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems in Montreal (NeurIPS 2018) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sapolsky, R.M.: Behave, The Biology of Humans at our Best and Worst. Vintage, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Coelho, H., Schilperoord, M.: Intersections: experiments and enhancements. In: Coelho, H., Espinasse, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th workshop on Agent-Based Simulation. SCS Publishing House, Erlangen (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Adamatti, D.F., Sichman, J.S., Coelho, H.: An analysis of the insertion of virtual players in GMABS methodology using the Vip-JogoMan prototype. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 12(3), 7 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Antunes, L., Balsa, J., Coelho, H.: Agents that collude to evade taxes. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems – AAMAS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lopes, F., Coelho, H. (eds.): Electricity Markets with Increasing Levels of Renewable Generation: Structure, Operation, Agent-based Simulation, and Emerging Designs. SSDC, vol. 144. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74263-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Passos, D.S., Coelho, H., Sarti, F.M.: Measuring banks’ antifragility via fuzzy logic. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. Int. Sci. Index Comput. Syst. Eng. 12(7), 153 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Santos, T., Louçã, J., Coelho, H.: Measuring agenda-setting effects on Twitter during the 2016 UK EU Referendum. In: Proceedings of the WCCS 2019, 22-24 April 2019

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am very indebted to my colleagues Carlos Lemos and João Balsa for the discussion of several themes of this paper, and during recent years. Social simulation and modeling is an area of AI research important to many fields in Portugal (and world wide), namely for the health care, where we need to be very careful. This research was funded by BioISI, FCT funding UID/MULTI04046/2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helder Coelho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Coelho, H. (2019). Reflections on Social Simulation and Complexity. In: Moura Oliveira, P., Novais, P., Reis, L. (eds) Progress in Artificial Intelligence. EPIA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11805. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30244-3_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30244-3_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30243-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30244-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics