Skip to main content

Benefit Graph Extraction from Healthcare Policies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019 (ISWC 2019)

Abstract

With healthcare fraud accounting for financial losses of billions of dollars each year in the United States, the task of investigating regulation adherence is key to reduce the impact of Fraud, Waste and Abuse (FWA) on the healthcare industry. Providers rendering services to patients typically submit claims to healthcare insurance agencies. Such claims must follow specific compliance criteria specified by state and federal policies. This paper presents an ontology-based system that aims to support the FWA claim investigation process by extracting graph-based actionable knowledge from policy text describing those compliance criteria. We discuss the process of creating a domain-specific ontology to model human experts’ conceptualisations and to incorporate early-on the feedback of FWA investigators, who are the early adopters of our solution. We explore whether the ontology is expressive and flexible enough to model the diverse compliance processes and complex relationships defined in policy documents. The ontology is then used, in combination with natural language understanding and semantic techniques, to guide the extraction of a Knowledge Graph (KG) from policies. Our solution is validated in terms of correctness and completeness by comparing the extracted knowledge to a ground truth created by investigators. Lastly, we discuss further challenges our deployed semantic system needs to tackle in this novel scenario, with the prospect of supporting the investigation process.

V. Lopez, V. Rho, T. S. Brisimi and F. Cucci—Equal research contribution. We would like to acknowledge Conor Cullen, Carlos Alzate, Spyros Kotoulas, Martin Stephenson, Pierpaolo Tommasi, Marco Sbodio, Denisa Moga and our OM: Tim Cooper, Mark Gillespie and Mark Goodhart for their support and insights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The shallow semantic parsing of the sentence is performed through a natural language understanding capability of SystemT, currently under development, that computes and exposes information regarding the semantic roles present in the sentence, e.g. actions, agents, themes and contextual information of those actions, together with information regarding voice, polarity, etc.

References

  1. https://www.nhcaa.org/resources/health-care-anti-fraud-resources/the-challenge-of-health-care-fraud.aspx. Accessed Apr 2019

  2. https://truvenhealth.com/media-room/press-releases/detail/prid/127/truven-health-analytics-professionals-receive-accredited-health-care-fraud-investigator. Accessed Apr 2019

  3. https://www.gao.gov/key_issues/medicaid_financing_access_integrity/issue_summary. Accessed Apr 2019

  4. Chandola, V., Sukumar, S.R., Schryver, J.C.: Knowledge discovery from massive healthcare claims data. In: Proceedings of the KDD, pp. 1312–1320 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joudaki, H., Rashidian, A., Minaei-Bidgoli, B., Mahmoodi, M., et al.: Using data mining to detect health care fraud and abuse: a review of literature. Glob. J. Health Sci. 7(1), 194–202 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Waghade, S.S., Karandikar, A.M.: A comprehensive study of healthcare fraud detection based on machine learning. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 13(6), 4175–4178 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wimalasuriya, D., Dou, D.: Ontology-based information extraction: an introduction and a survey of current approaches. J. Inf. Sci. 36(3), 306–323 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Martinez-Rodriguez, J.L., Hogan, A., Lopez-Arevalo, I.: Information extraction meets the Semantic Web: a survey. Semant. Web 1–81 (2018, pre-press)

    Google Scholar 

  9. https://tac.nist.gov/2017/KBP/ColdStart/index.html. Accessed Apr 2019

  10. Ben Abacha, A., Zweigenbaum, P.: Automatic extraction of semantic relations between medical entities: a rule based approach. J. Biomed. Semant. 2(5), S4 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mintz, M., Bills, S., Snow, R., Jurafsky, D.: Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. In: Proceedings of ACL and AFNLP, vol. 2, pp. 1003–1011 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Glass, M., Gliozzo, A., Hassanzadeh, O., Mihindukulasooriya, N., Rossiello, G.: Inducing implicit relations from text using distantly supervised deep nets. In: Vrandečić, D., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11136, pp. 38–55. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00671-6_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Peng, N., Poon, H., Quirk, C., Toutanova, K., Yih, W.: Cross-sentence N-ary relation extraction with graph LSTMs. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 5, 101–115 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saggion, H., Funk, A., Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K.: Ontology-based information extraction for business intelligence. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ISWC/ASWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 843–856. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_61

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Corcoglioniti, F., Rospocher, M., Aprosio, A.P.: Frame-based ontology population with PIKES. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 28(12), 3261–3275 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Piro, R., et al.: Semantic technologies for data analysis in health care. In: Groth, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9982, pp. 400–417. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46547-0_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Grimm, S., Abecker, A., Völker, J., Studer, R.: Ontologies and the semantic web. In: Domingue, J., Fensel, D., Hendler, J.A. (eds.) Handbook of Semantic Web Technologies, pp. 507–579. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92913-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. W3C Recommendation. https://www.w3.org/TR/csv2rdf/. Accessed Apr 2019

  19. Noy, N., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001–0880 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kalyanpur, A., Boguraev, B., Patwardhan, S., Murdock, J.W., et al.: Structured data and inference in DeepQA. IBM J. Res. Dev. 56(3), 10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chiticariu, L., Danilevsky, M., Li, Y., Reiss, F., Zhu, H.: Systemt: declarative text understanding for enterprise. In: NAACL-HLT, pp. 76–83 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanessa Lopez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lopez, V. et al. (2019). Benefit Graph Extraction from Healthcare Policies. In: Ghidini, C., et al. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019. ISWC 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11779. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30795-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30796-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics