Skip to main content

Implications for Teaching and for Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disruptive Technologies and the Language Classroom
  • 377 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores how the potential that the new technologies offer in the context of language learning and teaching can be realized at a time when the system of the traditional classroom is in a period of turbulence, or in chaos. It suggests possible ways of responding to the current phase shift, which is the result of traditional models and approaches to meaning-making in the language classroom being challenged by the introduction of new technological tools. The focus is on what teachers and institutions can do to support learners to use the new digital environments successfully and what the implications are for policy makers and researchers. The chapter concludes by calling for a social justice orientation to computer-assisted language learning (CALL).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Austin, N., Hampel, R., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2017). Video conferencing and multimodal expression of voice: Children’s conversations using Skype for second language development in a telecollaborative setting. System, 64, 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Complex systems and applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00148.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapelle, C. A., & Voss, E. (2016). 20 years of technology and language assessment in Language Learning & Technology. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 116–128. Available at https://www.lltjournal.org/item/2950. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44464.

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutrim Schmid, E. (2017). Teacher education in computer-assisted language learning: A sociocultural and linguistic perspective. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooly, M. (2018). “I do which the question”: Students’ innovative use of technology resources in the language classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 184–217. Available at https://www.lltjournal.org/item/3024. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44587.

  • Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50–80. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/doughty/.

  • Gleason, J., & Suvorov, R. (2019). Promoting social justice with CALL. CALICO Journal, 36(1), i–vii. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.37162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, F. (2017). Critical approaches to online intercultural language education. In S. L. Thorne & S. May (Eds.), Language, education and technology (pp. 219–231). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/327317. https://doi.org/10.2307/327317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, P., & Levy, M. (2016). Theory in computer-assisted language learning research and practice. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology (pp. 24–38). London and New York: Routledge. Available at https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315657899.ch2.

  • Karamifar, B., Stickler, U., Hampel, R., Germain-Rutherford, A., Hopkins, J., Heiser, S., et al. (2019). Perspectives and trajectories of the language teacher in the 21st century. In WorldCALL 2018 Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A., Norris, L., & Donohue, J. (2015). Mobile pedagogy for English language teaching: A guide for teachers. British Council 2015. London. Available at https://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/attachments/e485_mobile_pedagogy_for_elt_final_v2.pdf.

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2013). Complex systems and technemes: Learning as iterative adaptations. In J. Arnold & T. Murphey (Eds.), Meaningful action: Earl Stevick’s influence on language teaching (pp. 190–201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Toward an integrative framework for SLA. In AAAL Conference 2015. Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Hampel, R., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2019). Gesture in speaking tasks beyond the classroom: An exploration of the multimodal negotiation of meaning via Skype videoconferencing on mobile devices. System, 81, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Explaining dynamic interactions in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 96–120. Available at https://www.lltjournal.org/item/2998. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44613.

  • Lord, G., & Lomicka, L. (2008). Foreign language teacher preparation and asynchronous CMC: Promoting reflective teaching. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(4), 513–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, H., Brunnhuber, K., Juhl, C., Robinson, K., Leenaars, M., Dorch, B. F., et al. (2016). Towards evidence based research. BMJ, 355(8079), 5440. Available at https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/165826/165826.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5440.

  • McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S., & Jones, R. H. (Eds.). (2005). Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, L. (2017). New CALL-SLA research interfaces for the 21st century: Towards equitable multilingualism. CALICO Journal, 34(3), 285–316. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.33855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ, 312, 71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stickler, U., & Hampel, R. (2015). Transforming teaching: New skills for online language learning spaces. In R. Hampel & U. Stickler (Eds.), Developing online language teaching: Research-based pedagogies and reflective practices (pp. 63–77). New language learning and teaching environments. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Available at http://www.sfu.ca/~decaste/newlondon.htm.

  • Thorne, S. L. (2016). Engineering conditions of possibility in technology-enhanced language learning. In C. Caws & M.-J. Hamel (Eds.), Language-learner computer interactions: Theory, methodology and CALL applications (pp. 241–246). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A. (2014). ‘Two hundred ninety-four’: Remediation and multimodal performance in tourist placemaking. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(4), 459–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (2015). Designing for language learning in the wild: Creating social infrastructures for second language learning. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 75–102). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-006.

  • Ware, P., & Kessler, G. (2014). Telecollaboration in the secondary language classroom: Case study of adolescent interaction and pedagogical integration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.961481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Regine Hampel .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hampel, R. (2019). Implications for Teaching and for Research. In: Disruptive Technologies and the Language Classroom. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31368-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31368-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31367-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31368-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics