Skip to main content

An Optimal Algorithm to Find Champions of Tournament Graphs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
String Processing and Information Retrieval (SPIRE 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11811))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A tournament graph \(T = \left( V, E \right) \) is an oriented complete graph, which can be used to model a round-robin tournament between n players. In this short paper, we address the problem of finding a champion of the tournament, also known as Copeland winner, which is a player that wins the highest number of matches. Our goal is to solve the problem by minimizing the number of arc lookups, i.e., the number of matches played. We prove that finding a champion requires \(\varOmega (\ell n)\) comparisons, where \(\ell \) is the number of matches lost by the champion, and we present a deterministic algorithm matching this lower bound without knowing \(\ell \). Solving this problem has important implications on several Information Retrieval applications including Web search, conversational AI, machine translation, question answering, recommender systems, etc.

This paper is partially supported by the BIGDATAGRAPES (EU H2020 RIA, grant agreement 780751), the “Algorithms, Data Structures and Combinatorics for Machine Learning” (MIUR-PRIN 2017), the OK-INSAID (MIUR-PON 2018, grant agreement ARS01_00917) projects, and Scuola Normale Superiore.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ailon, N., Mohri, M.: An efficient reduction of ranking to classification. In: Servedio, R.A., Zhang, T. (eds.) 21st Annual Conference on Learning Theory - COLT 2008, Helsinki, Finland, 9–12 July 2008, pp. 87–98. Omnipress (2008). http://colt2008.cs.helsinki.fi/papers/32-Ailon.pdf

  2. Ailon, N., Mohri, M.: Preference-based learning to rank. Mach. Learn. 80(2–3), 189–211 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-010-5176-9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Banks, J.S.: Sophisticated voting outcomes and agenda control. Soc. Choice Welf. 1(4), 295–306 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brandt, F., Brill, M., Harrenstein, P.: Tournament solutions. In: Brandt, F., Conitzer, V., Endriss, U., Lang, J., Procaccia, A.D. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Social Choice, pp. 57–84. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107446984.004

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Charbit, P., Thomassé, S., Yeo, A.: The minimum feedback arc set problem is NP-hard for tournaments. Comb. Probab. Comput. 16, 1–4 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963548306007887

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Copeland, A.H.: A reasonable social welfare function. Technical report, Mimeo, University of Michigan (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gutin, G.Z., Mertzios, G.B., Reidl, F.: Searching for maximum out-degree vertices in tournaments. CoRR abs/1801.04702 (2018), http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.04702

  8. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G., Riedl, J.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 5–53 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/963770.963772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hudry, O.: A survey on the complexity of tournament solutions. Math. Soc. Sci. 57(3), 292–303 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.12.002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Laslier, J.F.: Tournament Solutions and Majority Voting, vol. 7. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Maarek, Y.: Alexa and her shopping journey. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2018, p. 1. ACM, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3269206.3272923

  12. Moon, J.W.: Topics on Tournaments. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York (1968)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Reid, K.B.: Tournaments. In: Gross, J.L., Yellen, J., Zhang, P. (eds.) Handbook of Graph Theory, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shen, J., Sheng, L., Wu, J.: Searching for sorted sequences of kings in tournaments. SIAM J. Comput. 32, 1201–1209 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539702410053

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Slater, P.: Inconsistencies in a schedule of paired comparisons. Biometrika 48(3/4), 303–312 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lorenzo Beretta , Franco Maria Nardini , Roberto Trani or Rossano Venturini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Beretta, L., Nardini, F.M., Trani, R., Venturini, R. (2019). An Optimal Algorithm to Find Champions of Tournament Graphs. In: Brisaboa, N., Puglisi, S. (eds) String Processing and Information Retrieval. SPIRE 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11811. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32686-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32686-9_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32685-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32686-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics