Skip to main content

Exploiting Vocabulary CALL Interventions to Operationalize and Test the Depth Levels of the Processing Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technology and the Psychology of Second Language Learners and Users

Part of the book series: New Language Learning and Teaching Environments ((NLLTE))

Abstract

This study examines the acquisition of Arabic vocabulary by students studying Arabic as a foreign language in a multimedia computer-assisted language learning environment. For this, the researchers designed three separate interactive interfaces: (1) the verbal-based menu-driven interface (L2-L1: MDI), (2) the visual-based graphical user interface (L2-Picture: GUI), and (3) the spatial-based zoomable user interface (L2-Context: ZUI). L2 novel words were delivered in each of these three teaching methods by means of computer-assisted vocabulary acquisition software. The participants of this current study consisted of British monolingual undergraduate students, whose performance was assessed and analyzed during immediate and delayed posttests. The findings proved consistent with levels of processing theory, suggesting that, in comparison to GUI and MDI, the deeper semantic processing resulting from ZUI tended to result in improved long-term retrieval.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acha, J. (2009). The effectiveness of multimedia programmes in children’s vocabulary learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akbulut, Y. (2007). Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of advanced learners of English as a foreign language. Instructional Science, 35(6), 499–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning and Technology, 5(1), 202–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzahrani, S. (2017). Linking multimedia vocabulary CALL research to SLA cognitive theories. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(7), 821–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. (2002). Investigating the effects of L1 and L2 glosses on foreign language reading comprehension and vocabulary retention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Computer-Assisted Language Instruction Consortium, Davis, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. (2002). Levels of processing: Past, present… and future? Memory, 10(5–6), 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I., & Watkins, M. J. (1973). The role of rehearsal in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(6), 599–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, M., & Vial, I. (2000). Multimedia design: The effects of relating multimodal information. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(2), 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagehi, A. Y. (2013). Strategies for defining and understanding critical technology integration terms. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1971). Visual recognition memory for complex configurations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 9(2), 237–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. C. (2009). Supporting student differences in listening comprehension and vocabulary learning with multimedia annotations. CALICO Journal, 26(2), 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. C., & Plass, J. L. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 546–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., & Gilman, D. A. (2008). Effects of text, audio, and graphic aids in multimedia instruction for vocabulary learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kost, C. R., Foss, P., & Lenzini, J. J. (1999). Textual and pictorial glosses: Effectiveness on incidental vocabulary growth when reading in a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 32(1), 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54(3), 399–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach (Vol. 1, p. 89). Hove: Language Teaching Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. C., & Tseng, Y. F. (2012). Videos and animations for vocabulary learning: A study on difficult words. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(4), 346–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart, R. S., & Craik, F. I. (1990). Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 44(1), 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscovitch, M., & Craik, F. I. (1976). Depth of processing, retrieval cues, and uniqueness of encoding as factors in recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15(4), 447–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (1st ed., p. 85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. (2013). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (2nd ed., p. 44). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. Language and Communication, 191, 225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plass, J. L., & Jones, L. (2005). Multimedia learning in second language acquisition. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 467–488). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rimrott, A. (2010). Computer-assisted vocabulary learning: multimedia annotations, word concreteness, and individualized instruction. Doctoral dissertation, Arts & Social Sciences, Department of Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. (1997). Learning the orthographical form of L2 vocabulary—A receptive and a productive process. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 181–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64(4), 913–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, Y., & Wang, C. W. (2003). Effects of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshii, M. (2006). L1 and L2 glosses: Their effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 85–101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saad Alzahrani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alzahrani, S., Roberts, L. (2020). Exploiting Vocabulary CALL Interventions to Operationalize and Test the Depth Levels of the Processing Model. In: Freiermuth, M.R., Zarrinabadi, N. (eds) Technology and the Psychology of Second Language Learners and Users. New Language Learning and Teaching Environments. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34212-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34212-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34211-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34212-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics