Skip to main content

Social Impact Assessment on a Mining Project in Peru Using the Grey Clustering Method and the Entropy-Weight Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applications of Computational Intelligence (ColCACI 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1096))

Abstract

Social impact assessment (SIA) has become a key factor for environmental conflicts prevention. In this study, we conducted SIA using the grey clustering method, which is based on grey systems theory. In addition, the entropy-weight method was applied to determine the most important criterion that could generate a social conflict. A case study was conducted on a mining project located in Cajamarca, Peru. Two stakeholder groups and seven evaluation criteria were identified. The results revealed that for the urban population stakeholder group, the project would have positive social impact; and for the rural population stakeholder group, the project would have negative social impact. In addition, the criterion C7 (Access to drinking water rate per year in the department of Cajamarca) was the most import criterion that could generate a social conflict. Consequently, the method showed quantitative and qualitative results that could help central and local governments to make the best decision on the project. Moreover, the grey clustering method showed interesting results that could be apply to assess other projects or programs from social point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Grufides.org. Conflicto conga: tercera etapa del juicio contra mando policiales y minera Yanacocha por herir gravemente a campesinos/as durante manifestación del 29 de noviembre 2011 (2018). https://www.ocmal.org/conflicto-conga-tercera-etapa-del-juicio-contra-mando-policiales-y-minera-yanacocha-por-herir-gravemente-a-campesinos-as-durante-manifestacion-del-29-de-noviembre-2011/. Accedido 12 Jun 2019. Prenzel, P.V., Vanclay, F.: How social impact assessment can contribute to conflict management. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 45, 30–37 (2014)

  2. Fowks, J.: Oro contra agua en Perú. El País, 28 July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prenzel, P.V., Vanclay, F.: How social impact assessment can contribute to conflict management. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 45, 30–37 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van der Voort, N., Vanclay, F.: Social impacts of earthquakes caused by gas extraction in the Province of Groningen, The Netherlands. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 50, 1–15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tang, B., Wong, S., Lau, M.C.: Social impact assessment and public participation in China: a case study of land requisition in Guangzhou. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 28, 57–72 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, S., Lin, Y.: Grey Systems: Theory and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16158-2

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Wittmer, H., Rauschmayer, F., Klauer, B.: How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts? Land Policy 23, 1–9 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, L.N., Wu, F.P., Jia, P.: Grey evaluation model based on reformative triangular whitenization weight function and its application in water rights allocation system. Open Cybern. Syst. J. 7, 1–10 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, Y., Ni, J., Liu, J., Jian, L.: Grey evaluation empirical study based on center-point triangular whitenization weight function of Jiangsu Province industrial technology innovation strategy alliance. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. 4, 124–136 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamilton, S.H., ElSawah, S., Guillaume, J.H.A., Jakeman, A.J., Pierce, S.A.: Integrated assessment and modelling: overview and synthesis of salient dimensions. Environ. Model Softw. 64, 215–229 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Arun, E.: Towards a shared systems model of stakeholders in environmental conflict. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 15, 239–253 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luyet, V., Schlaepfer, R., Parlange, M.B., Buttler, A.: A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. J. Environ. Manag. 111, 213–219 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Delgado, A., Romero, I.: Applying grey systems and shannon entropy to social impact assessment and environmental conflict analysis. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 12, 973–4562 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Delgado, A.: Social conflict analysis on a mining project using shannon entropy. In: 2017 IEEE XXIV International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing (INTERCON), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Corbetta, P.: Metodología y técnicas de investigación social. McGRAW-HILL, Madrid (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aznar, J., Guijarro, F.: Nuevos métodos de valoración, modelos multicriterio, vol. 2a. Universitat Politèctica de València, Valencia (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Piésold, K.: Estudio de Impacto Ambiental del Proyecto Conga. Minera Yanacocha S.R.L., Perú (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sánchez, W.: Por qué el proyecto conga es inviable? Universidad Nacional de Cajamarca, Cajamarca (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Landeta, J.: El método Delphi, Una técnica de previsión del futuro. Editorial Ariel, Barcelona (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Campos-Climent, V., Apetrei, A., Chaves-Ávila, R.: Delphi method applied to horticultural cooperatives. Manag. Decis. 50, 1266–1284 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211247003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Sadeghi, M., Ameli, A.: An AHP decision making model for optimal allocation of energy subsidy among socio-economic subsectors in Iran. Energy Policy 45, 24–32 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baykasoğlu, A., Gölcük, İ.: Development of a novel multiple-attribute decision making model via fuzzy cognitive maps and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS. Inf. Sci. 301, 75–98 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.12.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Delgado, A.: Why do any secondary students prefer the mathematics? A response using grey systems. In: Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium on Engineering Accreditation, ICACIT 2017 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Delgado, A., Vriclizar, D., Medina, E.: Artificial intelligence model based on grey systems to assess water quality from Santa river watershed. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Electronic Congress, E-CON UNI 2017, vol. 2018-Janua (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexi Delgado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Delgado, A., Carbajal, C., Reyes, H., Romero, I. (2019). Social Impact Assessment on a Mining Project in Peru Using the Grey Clustering Method and the Entropy-Weight Method. In: Orjuela-Cañón, A., Figueroa-García, J., Arias-Londoño, J. (eds) Applications of Computational Intelligence. ColCACI 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1096. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36211-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36211-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36210-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36211-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics