Skip to main content

Network Shapley-Shubik Power Index: Measuring Indirect Influence in Shareholding Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Complex Networks and Their Applications VIII (COMPLEX NETWORKS 2019)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 882))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Extending the Shapley-Shubik power index to networks, we propose a new measure and numerical method to calculate the indirect influence of investors on companies: Network power index (NPI). While the original index, reflecting the characteristics of majority vote in a shareholders meeting, measures the direct voting power of a shareholder, NPI captures not only an investor’s direct influence over a company but also indirect influence over this company’s subsidiary. Since NPI is often incalculable in a large network, we present a new method to numerically compute NPI: label propagation. Applying this method to the global shareholding networks in 2016, we find NPIs and raw vote shares dramatically diverge for some investors and this discrepancy suggests the difference in investment strategies between governments and private financial institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bureau van Dijk’s Orbis. https://www.bvdinfo.com/en-gb. Accessed 27 Apr 2019

  2. Banzhaf III, J.F.: Weighted voting doesn’t work: a mathematical analysis. Rutgers L. Rev. 19, 317 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bertini, C., Mercik, J., Stach, I.: Indirect control and power. Oper. Res. Decisions 2, 7–30 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Crama, Y., Leruth, L.: Control and voting power in corporate networks: concepts and computational aspects. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178(3), 879–893 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Crama, Y., Leruth, L.: Power indices and the measurement of control in corporate structures. Int. Game Theory Rev. 15(03), 1340017 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubey, P., Shapley, L.S.: Mathematical properties of the banzhaf power index. Math. Oper. Res. 4(2), 99–131 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gambarelli, G., Owen, G.: Indirect control of corporations. Int. J. Game Theory 23(4), 287–302 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Karos, D., Peters, H.: Indirect control and power in mutual control structures. Games Econ. Behav. 92, 150–165 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Laffont, J.J., Martimort, D.: The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agentmodel. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Levy, M.: Control in pyramidal structures. Corp. Governance Int. Rev. 17(1), 77–89 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Levy, M., Szafarz, A.: Cross-ownership: a device for management entrenchment? Rev. Finance 21(4), 1675–1699 (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Mercik, J., Łobos, K.: Index of implicit power as a measure of reciprocal ownership. In: Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXIII, pp. 128–140. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Penrose, L.S.: The elementary statistics of majority voting. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 109(1), 53–57 (1946)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shapley, L.S., Shubik, M.: A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 48(3), 787–792 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W.: A survey of corporate governance. J. Finance 52(2), 737–783 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Strøm, K.: Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 37(3), 261–290 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vitali, S., Glattfelder, J.B., Battiston, S.: The network of global corporate control. PloS One 6(10), e25995 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 18H03627 and 16H05904.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shohei Doi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mizuno, T., Doi, S., Kurizaki, S. (2020). Network Shapley-Shubik Power Index: Measuring Indirect Influence in Shareholding Networks. In: Cherifi, H., Gaito, S., Mendes, J., Moro, E., Rocha, L. (eds) Complex Networks and Their Applications VIII. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2019. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 882. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36683-4_49

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics