Skip to main content

Recommendations for Conducting Service-Dominant Logic Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Trends in Business Information Systems and Technology

Abstract

In the digital age, companies compete on how well their service meets customer needs and solves customer problems, interacting with ever more actors to fulfill their promise. A well-suited mid-range theory to conduct research in this “new” world is service-dominant (S-D) logic. However, there are no guidelines or a commonly agreed framework for systematically conducting S-D logic research. To fill this gap, this chapter reviews and analyzes the use of S-D logic in research. It provides recommendations for conducting S-D logic in research and proposes an organizing framework for applied research settings and beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Please note that “service” thus differs from G-D “services”, i.e. intangible goods.

  2. 2.

    Preliminarily trials of full-text searches in academic databases on S-D logic and its concepts, such as “value-in-use” yielded the insight that the identified research consistently cited the seminal papers, hence the approach of citation analysis.

  3. 3.

    Please note that Google Scholar was used as the leading system and academic databases were accessed consecutively for article retrieval. We found no other database that covered all and “early” modes of scholarly communication (such as books and conferences), which is necessary in nascent field reviews as this.

References

  1. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Mark. 68(1), 1–17 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brust, L., Antons, D., Breidbach, C., Salge, T.O.: Service-dominant logic and information systems research: a review and analysis using topic modeling. In: 38th International Conference on Information Systems: Transforming Society with Digital Innovation, ICIS 2017. Association for Information Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kryvinska, N., Olexova, R., Dohmen, P., Strauss, C.: The s-d logic phenomenon—conceptualization and systematization by reviewing the literature of a decade (2004–2013). J. Serv. Sci. Res. 5(1), 35–94 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Olexova, R., Kubickova, V.: The evolution of the s-d logic approach and its impact on service science. J. Serv. Sci. Res. 6(1), 99–124 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilden, R., Akaka, M., Karpen, I., Hohberger, J.: The evolution and prospects of service-dominant logic: an investigation of past, present, and future research. J. Serv. Res. 20(4), 345–361 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 36(1), 1–10 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chandler, J.D., Vargo, S.L.: Contextualization and value-in-context: how context frames exchange. Mark. Theory 11(1), 35–49 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grönroos, C.: Conceptualising value co-creation: a journey to the 1970s and back to the future. Journal of Mark. Manag. 28(13–14), 1520–1534 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Akaka, M.A., Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: The complexity of context: a service ecosystems approach for international marketing. J. Int. Mark. 21(4), 1–20 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Why service? J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 36(1), 25–38 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brinberg, D., McGrath, J.E.: Validity and the Research Process. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grewal, D., Levy, M.: Retailing research: past, present and future. J. Retail. 83(4), 447–464 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown, J.R., Dant, R.P.: Scientific method and retailing research: a retrospective. J. Retail. 84(1), 1–13 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim C. F. Ehrenthal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ehrenthal, J.C.F., Gruen, T.W., Hofstetter, J.S. (2021). Recommendations for Conducting Service-Dominant Logic Research. In: Dornberger, R. (eds) New Trends in Business Information Systems and Technology. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 294. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48332-6_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics