Skip to main content

The Information Repertoire of People with Disabilities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Practice (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12189))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2582 Accesses

Abstract

In a study on the information repertoire of people with disabilities in Germany, 617 people were asked which media they use to obtain information on topics relevant to them. The aim is to investigate participation in public communication and to find out which factors influence the size and diversity of the information repertoire of people with disabilities. The core of the study was a cluster analysis, which identified typical information repertoires. The clusters were compared in their composition according to social and impairment-related characteristics, barriers in the media and the importance of information needs.

As a result, six typical information repertoires were formed, which differ significantly in size and composition. From the clusters, constellations of contextual factors can be derived which particularly hinder or facilitate equal participation in public communication. Four particularly disadvantaged constellations were identified.

The study was conducted as part of the author’s dissertation at the TU Dortmund University [10].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is no clear translation for “Teilhabeforschung” in German-speaking countries.

References

  1. Berger, A., Caspers, T., Croll, J., et al.: Web 2.0/barrierefrei. Eine Studie zur Nutzung von Web 2.0 Anwendungen durch Menschen mit Behinderung, Bonn (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bosse, I., Hasebrink, U.: Mediennutzung von Menschen mit Behinderungen. Forschungsbericht (2016). http://www.kme.tu-dortmund.de/cms/de/Aktuelles/aktuelle-Meldungen/Langfassung-der-Studie-_Mediennutzung-von-Menschen-mit-Behinderungen_-veroeffentlicht/Studie-Mediennutzung_Langfassung_final.pdf

  3. Bosse, I., Zaynel, N., Lampert, C.: MeKoBe - Medienkompetenz in der Behindertenhilfe in Bremen. Bedarfserfassung und Handlungsempfehlungen für die Gestaltung von Fortbildungen zur Medienkompetenzförderung. Abschlussbericht (2018). http://www.bremische-landesmedienanstalt.de/studie-zu-medienkompetenz-der-behindertenhilfe-veroeffentlicht. Accessed 15 Nov 2018

  4. Bühler, C.: Sieben Fragen zur inklusiven Medienbildung. In: Bosse, I. (ed.) Medienbildung im Zeitalter der Inklusion, Düsseldorf, pp. 27–57 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. List of issues prior to submission of the combined second and third periodic report of Germany (2018). https://www.gemeinsam-einfach-machen.de/GEM/DE/AS/UN_BRK/Staatenpruefung/Zweite_Staatenpruefung/Bericht_englisch.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2. Accessed 14 Feb 2020

  6. Dobransky, K., Hargittai, E.: Unrealized potential. Exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics 58, 18–28 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Döring, N., Bortz, J. (eds.): Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Duplaga, M.: Digital divide among people with disabilities: analysis of data from a nationwide study for determinants of Internet use and activities performed online. PLoS ONE 12(6), e0179825 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goggin, G.: Disability and digital inequalities. rethinking digital divides with disability theory. In: Ragnedda, M., Muschert, G.W. (eds.) Theorizing Digital Divides, pp. 63–74. Routledge, London (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haage, A.: Das Informationsrepertoire von Menschen mit Beeinträchtigungen. Eine Studie zur Mediennutzung von Menschen mit Beeinträchtigungen. Dissertation, TU Dortmund (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haage, A., Bosse, I.K.: Media use of persons with disabilities. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) UAHCI 2017. LNCS, Part III, vol. 10279, pp. 419–435. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58700-4_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Haage, A., Bühler, C.: Barrierefreiheit. In: Bosse, I., Schluchter, J.-R., Zorn, I. (eds.) Handbuch Inklusion und Medienbildung, pp. 207–215. Beltz Juventa, Weinheim (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haage, A., Zaynel, N.: Medienpädagogische Qualität bedeutet, alle zu berücksichtigen. Erkenntnisse aus der Forschung zur Mediennutzung, Medienkompetenz und -bildung von Menschen mit Beeinträchtigungen. In: Knaus, T., Meister, D., Narr, K. (eds.) Futurelab Medienpädagogik, pp. 167–180. kopaed, München (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hasebrink, U., Domeyer, H.: Zum Wandel von Informationsrepertoires in konvergierenden Medienumgebungen. In: Hartmann, M., Hepp, A. (eds.) Die Mediatisierung der Alltagswelt, pp. 49–64. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlage, Wiesbaden (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hasebrink, U., Hepp, A.: How to research cross-media practices? Investigating media repertoires and media ensembles. Convergence 23(4), 362–377 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517700384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hasebrink, U., Hölig, S.: Deconstructing audiences in converging media environments. In: Sparviero, S., Peil, C., Balbi, G. (eds.) Media Convergence and Deconvergence, pp. 113–133. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Hasebrink, U., Popp, J.: Media repertoires as a result of selective media use. A conceptual approach to the analysis of patterns of exposure. 31(3), 369–387 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2006.023

  18. Heitplatz, V.N., Bühler, C., Hastall, M.R.: Caregivers’ influence on smartphone usage of people with cognitive disabilities: an explorative case study in Germany. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11573, pp. 98–115. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23563-5_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Helsper, E.J., Reisdorf, B.C.: The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Med. Soc. 19(8), 1253–1270 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hennies, J.: Prälinguale Hörbehinderung und Schriftsprachkompetenz. In: Maaß, C., Rink, I. (eds.) Handbuch Barrierefreie Kommunikation, pp. 201–220. Frank & Timme Verlag für wissenschaftliche Literatur, Berlin (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hölig, S., Domeyer, H., Hasebrink, U.: Souveräne Bindungen: Zeitliche Bezüge in Medienrepertoires und Kommunikationsmodi. In: Suckfüll, M. (ed.) Rezeption und Wirkung in zeitlicher Perspektive, 1st edn, pp. 70–88. Nomos, Baden-Baden (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Krotz, F.: Mediatisierung. Fallstudien zum Wandel von Kommunikation, 1. Aufl. Medien - Kultur - Kommunikation. VS, Verl. für Sozialwiss, Wiesbaden (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Macdonald, S.J., Clayton, J.: Back to the future, disability and the digital divide. Disabil. Soc. 28(5), 702–718 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.732538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mayerle, M.: Berufsfeld Tagesförderung/ Wohneinrichtungen. In: Bosse, I., Schluchter, J.-R., Zorn, I. (eds.) Handbuch Inklusion und Medienbildung, pp. 170–180. Beltz Juventa, Weinheim (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Röhm, A.: Stigmatisierung und Entstigmatisierung von Menschen mit Behinderungen: Einfluss unterschiedlicher medialer Darstellungen auf Einstellungen und Handlungsintentionen. Dissertation, TU Dortmund (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sachdeva, N., Tuikka, A.-M., Kimppa, K.K., et al.: Digital disability divide in information society. A framework based on a structured literature review. J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc. 13(3/4), 283–298 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-10-2014-0050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schendera, C.F.G.: Clusteranalyse mit SPSS. Mit Faktorenanalyse. Wirtschaftsmathematik-und Statistik 8-2011. Oldenbourg, München (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt J-H (2013) Social Media. Medienwissen kompakt. Imprint: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  29. Trültzsch, S., Kouts-Klemm, R., Aroldi, P.: Transforming digital divide in different national contexts. In: Carpentier, N., Schrøder, K.C., Hallett, L. (eds.) Audience Transformations Shifting Audience Positions in Late Modernity, pp. 191–209. Routledge, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006). https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-2.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2020

  31. Vicente, M.R., López, A.J.: A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide. Some evidence for internet use. Inf. Soc. 26(1), 48–64 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440903423245

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annegret Haage .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Haage, A. (2020). The Information Repertoire of People with Disabilities. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Practice. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12189. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49108-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49108-6_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49107-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49108-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics