Abstract
The multitude of users within smart home systems can lead to privacy concerns for individuals within a household. Three examples of smart home settings are conceptualized and analyzed with the framework of contextual integrity. Prominent privacy breaches are discovered. To secure the safety of PII within smart home settings we propose to develop transparency measures with manufacturers and communication with all users within a household.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wilson, C., Hargreaves, T., Hauxwell-Baldwin, R.: Smart homes and their users: a systematic analysis and key challenges. Per. Ubiquit. Comput. 19, 463–476 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0813-0
Herrmann, T., Lentzsch, C., Degeling, M.: Intervention and EUD. In: Malizia, A., Valtolina, S., Morch, A., Serrano, A., Stratton, A. (eds.) IS-EUD 2019. LNCS, vol. 11553, pp. 67–82. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24781-2_5
Norberg, P.A., Horne, D.R., Horne, D.A.: The privacy paradox: personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. J. Consum. Aff. 41, 100–126 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x
Lau, J., Zimmerman, B., Schaub, F.: Alexa, are you listening? privacy perceptions, concerns and privacy-seeking behaviors with smart speakers. Proc. ACM Hum. -Comput. Interact. 2, 1–31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274371
Emami-Naeini, P., Dixon, H., Agarwal, Y., Cranor, L.F.: Exploring how privacy and security factor into iot device purchase behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2019, pp. 1–12. ACM Press, Glasgow (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300764
Nissenbaum, H.: Privacy as contextual integrity. Wash. Law Rev. 79, 119 (2004)
Nissenbaum, H.F.: Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford Law Books, Stanford, Calif (2010)
Martin, K., Nissenbaum, H.: Measuring privacy: an empirical test using context to expose confounding variables. Colum. Sci. Tech. L. Rev. 18, 176 (2016)
Hart, H.L.A.: The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)
Edmunds, M.: A Good Life: Human Rights and Encounters with Modernity. ANU Press (2013)
Liao, S.M.: Human rights as fundamental conditions for a good life. In: Liao, S.M. (ed.) The Right to Be Loved. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)
Van den Hoven, J.: Privacy and the varieties of informational wrongdoing. In: Computer Ethics, pp. 317–330. Routledge (2017)
Fried, C.: Privacy. Yale Law J. 77, 475 (1968)
Regan, P.M.: Legislating privacy: technology, social values, and public policy. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Konrad, M., Koch-Sonneborn, S., Lentzsch, C. (2020). The Right to Privacy in Socio-Technical Smart Home Settings: Privacy Risks in Multi-Stakeholder Environments . In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds) HCI International 2020 - Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1226. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_71
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_71
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50731-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50732-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)