Skip to main content

Abstract

In this work, different social data mining approaches are used to characterize the user churning and social traits of the Bioinformatics community over the first ten years of Stack Overflow. The proposed workflow consists of a four-step procedure that allows the characterization of users based on the social exchange exhibited by the Bioinformatics community and the Developers communities, notably the Python, Matlab and R programming communities. The motivation is to improve user churning and the quality of social interactions by categorizing user traits and being able to understand how Stack Overflow, and other Stack Exchange databases, may better respond to current user concerns and interests. Therefore, initial user identification was complemented by a second categorization focused on user “genealogy”. The goal was to explore the evolving of user interests and, in particular, the migration and swapping of users across different communities throughout the years. Noticeably, a considerable number of Bioinformatics users has moved to the Developers communities. An in-depth exploration of the most popular topics of conversation in Bioinformatics enabled a better understanding of the triggers and contents of these conversations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2019. https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2019/. Accessed 28 Jan 2020

  2. Neshati, M.: On early detection of high voted Q&A on Stack Overflow. Inf. Process. Manag. 53, 780–798 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2017.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adaji, I., Vassileva, J.: Susceptibility of users to social influence strategies and the influence of culture in a Q&A collaborative learning environment. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), pp. 49–64. Springer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63874-4_5

  4. Bornfeld, B., Rafaeli, S.: When interaction is valuable: feedback, churn and survival on community question and answer sites: the case of stack exchange. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2019). https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2019.096

  5. Bornfeld, B., Rafaeli, S.: When interaction is valuable: feedback, churn and survival on community question and answer sites: the case of stack exchange

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta, R., Reddy, P.K.: towards question improvement on knowledge sharing platforms: a stack overflow case study. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Knowledge, ICBK 2017, pp. 41–48. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBK.2017.25

  7. Khodadadi, A., Hosseini, S.A., Tavakoli, E., Rabiee, H.R.: Continuous-time user modeling in presence of badges: a probabilistic approach. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3162050

  8. Berger, P., Hennig, P., Bocklisch, T., Herold, T., Meinel, C.: A journey of bounty hunters: analyzing the influence of reward systems on stackoverflow question response times. In: Proceedings of 2016 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2016, pp. 644–649. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/WI.2016.0114

  9. Slag, R., De Waard, M., Bacchelli, A.: One-day flies on StackOverflow - why the vast majority of StackOverflow users only posts once. In: IEEE International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp. 458–461. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2015.63

  10. Sharif, S.M.: Question and accepted answer recommendation system with a generic knowledge mining visualization tool

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, D., Johnson, S., Foster, C., Li, E., Elmiligi, H., Rahman, M.: Improving response time prediction for stack overflow questions. In: 2019 IEEE 10th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference, IEMCON 2019, pp. 786–791. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCON.2019.8936252

  12. Mayowa Ishola, O., Mccalla, G.: Predicting prospective peer helpers to provide just-in-time help to users in question and answer forums

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sun, J., Moosavi, S., Ramnath, R., Parthasarathy, S.: QDEE: question difficulty and expertise estimation in community question answering sites (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Russell, P.H., Johnson, R.L., Ananthan, S., Harnke, B., Carlson, N.E.: A large-scale analysis of bioinformatics code on GitHub. PLoS ONE 13 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205898

  15. Chang, C.-C., Lin, C.-J.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blei, D.M., Edu, B.B., Ng, A.Y., Edu, A.S., Jordan, M.I., Edu, J.B.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wallach, H.M., Murray, I., Salakhutdinov, R., Mimno, D.: Evaluation methods for topic models. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1553374.1553515

  18. Sievert, C., Shirley, K.: LDAvis: a method for visualizing and interpreting topics, pp. 63–70 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/w14-3110

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Consellería de Educación, Universidades e Formación Profesional (Xunta de Galicia) under the scope of the strategic funding of ED431C2018/55-GRC Competitive Reference Group, and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the scope of the strategic funding of UIDB/04469/2020 unit and BioTecNorte operation (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004) funded by the European Regional Development Fund under the scope of Norte2020 - Programa Operacional Regional do Norte. SING group thanks CITI (Centro de Investigación, Transferencia e Innovación) from the University of Vigo for hosting its IT infrastructure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florentino Fdez-Riverola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pérez-López, R., Blanco, G., Fdez-Riverola, F., Lourenço, A. (2021). The Activity of Bioinformatics Developers and Users in Stack Overflow. In: Panuccio, G., Rocha, M., Fdez-Riverola, F., Mohamad, M., Casado-Vara, R. (eds) Practical Applications of Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, 14th International Conference (PACBB 2020). PACBB 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1240. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54568-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics