Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Imaging in Bladder Dysfunctions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Non-Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunctions

Part of the book series: Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions ((UNPFD))

  • 336 Accesses

Abstract

Clinical assessment and urodynamic studies (UDS) remain the gold standard for the diagnosis of lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) but it is important to recognize the potential and emerging role of noninvasive diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in this field. In particular, imaging provides direct information about the morphological and functional anatomy of the lower urinary tract (LUT), allowing a better understanding of the pathophysiology of LUTD. Ultrasound (US) is the first-choice imaging modality in the diagnostic workup of men and women with lower urinary tract symptoms due to its cost-effectiveness, lack of radiation exposure, noninvasiveness, and wide availability. Different ultrasound approaches are available such as transabdominal (TAUS), transperineal (TPUS), transvaginal (TVUS), and transrectal (TRUS) ultrasound. Due to the differences in the anatomy of LUT in males and females, resulting in different pathological disorders and clinical presentations, and to the different ultrasound approaches available in the two genders, the diagnostic US assessment of LUTD in men and women will be discussed separately. TAUS represents the first-line approach in both sexes and it provides a primary assessment of post-void residual urine (PVR) and bladder wall thickness (BWT). TPUS is the recommended approach in women for an optimal evaluation of urethral status (mobility and funneling) and pelvic organ prolapse. In men, TAUS and TRUS are used to assess prostate size and morphology and biomarkers that evaluate both these parameters are preferred, such as presumed circle area ratio (PCAR), intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) and prostatic urethral angle (PUA). The aim of this chapter is to provide practical information on the use of imaging, primarily US, in the diagnosis of LUTD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Malde S, Nambiar AK, Umbach R, et al. Systematic review of the performance of noninvasive tests in diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Eur Urol. 2017;71:391–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tubaro A, Nambiar AK. Grey zone: urinary incontinence. Eur Urol Focus. 2016;2:337–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 6th International Consultation on Incontinence book. 2017. https://www.ics.org/education/icspublications/icibooks/6thicibook.

  4. EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence. 2020. https://uroweb.org/guideline/urinary-incontinence.

  5. EAU guidelines on management of non-neurogenic male LUTS. 2020. https://uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts.

  6. Shin UJ, Koh J, Song J, et al. Sonographic evaluation of bladder wall thickness in women with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018;61:367–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI): AUA/SUFU guideline. 2017. https://www.auanet.org/guidelines/stress-urinary-incontinence-(sui)-guideline.

  8. DeLancey JO. The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1488–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor part I: two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:80–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dietz HP. Pelvic floor ultrasound: a review. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60:58–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vangoitsenhoven M, Vandenbroucke V, Van Den Bosch T. Routine gynecological ultrasound: look at the bladder and the ureters! Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2020;11:347–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rademakers KL, van Koeveringe GA, Oelke M. Ultrasound detrusor wall thickness measurement in combination with bladder capacity can safely detect detrusor underactivity in adult men. World J Urol. 2017;35:153–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khullar V, Salvatore S, Cardozo L, et al. A novel technique for measuring bladder wall thickness in women using transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994;4:220–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lekskulchai O, Dietz HP. Detrusor wall thickness as a test for detrusor overactivity in women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:535–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oelke M, Khullar V, Wijkstra H. Review on ultrasound measurement of bladder or detrusor wall thickness in women: techniques, diagnostic utility, and use in clinical trials. World J Urol. 2013;31:1093–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oelke M, Höfner K, Jonas U, et al. Ultrasound measurement of detrusor wall thickness in healthy adults. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25:308–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bright E, Oelke M, Tubaro A, et al. Ultrasound estimated bladder weight and measurement of bladder wall thickness—useful noninvasive methods for assessing the lower urinary tract? J Urol. 2010;184:1847–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Latthe PM, Champaneria R, Khan KS. Systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound as the method of measuring bladder wall thickness in the diagnosis of detrusor overactivity. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:1019–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Antunes-Lopes T, Cruz CD, Cruz F, et al. Biomarkers in lower urinary tract symptoms/overactive bladder: a critical overview. Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24:352–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Serati M, Salvatore S, Cattoni E, et al. Ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness in different forms of detrusor overactivity. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:1405–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Latthe P, Middleton L, Rachaneni S, et al. Ultrasound bladder wall thickness and detrusor overactivity: a multicentre test accuracy study. BJOG. 2017;124:1422–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wieczorek AP, Wozniak MM, Stankiewicz A, et al. 3-D high-frequency endovaginal ultrasound of female urethral complex and assessment of inter-observer reliability. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lone F, Sultan AH, Stankiewicz A, et al. Interobserver agreement of multicompartment ultrasound in the assessment of pelvic floor anatomy. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150704.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao Y, Zhao Z, Yang Y, et al. Diagnostic value of pelvic floor ultrasonography for diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31:15–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chamié LP, Ribeiro DMFR, Caiado AHM, et al. Translabial US and dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor: normal anatomy and dysfunction. Radiographics. 2018;38:287–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part II: three-dimensional or volume imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:615–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chapple C, Abrams P. Male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS): an international consultation on male LUTS. Fukuoka, Japan; 2013. p. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Abrams P. In support of pressure-flow studies for evaluating men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology. 1994;44:153–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:167–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chapple CR, Wein AJ, Abrams P, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms revisited: a broader clinical perspective. Eur Urol. 2008;54:563–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Oh MM, Choi H, Park MG, et al. Is there a correlation between the presence of idiopathic detrusor overactivity and the degree of bladder outlet obstruction? Urology. 2011;77:167–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomas AW, Cannon A, Bartlett E, et al. The natural history of lower urinary tract dysfunction in men: the influence of detrusor underactivity on the outcome after transurethral resection of the prostate with a minimum 10-year urodynamic follow-up. BJU Int. 2004;93:745–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Hayek S, Thomas A, Abrams P. Natural history of detrusor contractility—minimum ten-year urodynamic follow-up in men with bladder outlet obstruction and those with detrusor. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2004;(215):101–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thorpe A, Neal D. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Lancet. 2003;36:1359–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Asimakopoulos AD, De Nunzio C, Kocjancic E, et al. Measurement of post-void residual urine. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:55–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. AUA guidelines on benign prostatic hyperplasia: surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms (2018, amended 2019, 2020). https://www.auanet.org/guidelines/benign-prostatic-hyperplasia-(bph)-guideline.

  37. Sullivan MP, Yalla SV. Detrusor contractility and compliance characteristics in adult male patients with obstructive and nonobstructive voiding dysfunction. J Urol. 1996;155:1995–2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Oelke M, Höfner K, Jonas U, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive tests to evaluate bladder outlet obstruction in men: detrusor wall thickness, uroflowmetry, postvoid residual urine, and prostate volume. Eur Urol. 2007;52:827–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mochtar CA, Kiemeney LA, van Riemsdijk MM, et al. Post-void residual urine volume is not a good predictor of the need for invasive therapy among patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2006;175:213–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jacobsen SJ, Jacobson DJ, Girman CJ, et al. Treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia among community dwelling men: the Olmsted County study of urinary symptoms and health status. J Urol. 1999;162:1301–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Roehrborn CG. Alfuzosin 10 mg once daily prevents overall clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia but not acute urinary retention: results of a 2-year placebo-controlled study. BJU Int. 2006;97:734–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Foster HE, Dahm P, Kohler TS, et al. Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA guideline amendment 2019. J Urol. 2019;202:592–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fusco F, Creta M, De Nunzio C, et al. Progressive bladder remodeling due to bladder outlet obstruction: a systematic review of morphological and molecular evidences in humans. BMC Urol. 2018;18:15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. De Nunzio C, Presicce F, Lombardo R, et al. Detrusor overactivity increases bladder wall thickness in male patients: a urodynamic multicenter cohort study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:1616–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bosch R, Abrams P, Averbeck MA, et al. Do functional changes occur in the bladder due to bladder outlet obstruction?—ICI-RS. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;38:56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Presicce F, DE Nunzio C, Gacci M, et al. Non-invasive ultrasound measurements in male patients with LUTS and benign prostatic obstruction: implication for diagnosis and treatment. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017;69:220–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Garg G, Sankhwar SN, Goel A, et al. Evaluation of resistive index of the prostate and bladder sonomorphologic parameters as replacements for urodynamics to predict bladder outlet obstruction in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2019;11:163–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Blatt AH, Titus J, Chan L. Ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness in the assessment of voiding dysfunction. J Urol. 2008;179:2275–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mangat R, Ho HSS, Kuo TLC. Non-invasive evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men. Asian J Urol. 2018;5:42–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stravodimos KG, Petrolekas A, Kapetanakis T, et al. TRUS versus transabdominal ultrasound as a predictor of enucleated adenoma weight in patients with BPH: a tool for standard preoperative work-up? Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41:767–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Watanabe H. New concept of BPH: PCAR theory. Prostate. 1998;37:116–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kojima M, Ochiai A, Naya Y, et al. Correlation of presumed circle area ratio with infravesical obstruction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology. 1997;50:548–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Abdi H, Kazzazi A, Bazargani ST, et al. Imaging in benign prostatic hyperplasia: what is new? Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23:11–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Keqin Z, Zhishun X, Jing Z, et al. Clinical significance of intravesical prostatic protrusion in patients with benign prostatic enlargement. Urology. 2007;70:1096–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Yuen JS, Ngiap JT, Cheng CW, et al. Effects of bladder volume on transabdominal ultrasound measurements of intravesical prostatic protrusion and volume. Int J Urol. 2002;9:225–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rieken M, Presicce F, Autorino R, et al. Clinical significance of intravesical prostatic protrusion in the management of benign prostatic enlargement: a systematic review and critical analysis of current evidence. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017;69:548–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

    Simone Agostini, Elena Bertelli, Silvia Verna, Lorenzo Lattavo & Matteo Mastrorosato

Authors
  1. Simone Agostini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elena Bertelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Silvia Verna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lorenzo Lattavo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Matteo Mastrorosato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Agostini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy

    Matteo Balzarro

  2. Unit of Minimally Invasive, Robotic Urologic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Experimental Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

    Vincenzo Li Marzi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Agostini, S., Bertelli, E., Verna, S., Lattavo, L., Mastrorosato, M. (2021). Imaging in Bladder Dysfunctions. In: Balzarro, M., Li Marzi, V. (eds) Non-Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunctions. Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57393-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57393-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57392-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57393-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation