Abstract
Technical debt is created when software engineers knowingly or unknowingly introduce shortcuts or unsuitable choices in the development or maintenance of the software system, that will have a negative impact on the future evolution of the system until corrected. Therefore, it is crucial to manage established debt particular in the public sector. The aim of this study is to introduce Technical debt to the field of Digital Government. We create an overview of the state of the art of the knowledge on technical debt management, the methods applied to gain this knowledge, and propose a research agenda to Digital Government scholars. We conduct a systematic literature review, which focuses on the concept of technical debt management. Forty-nine papers published within 2017–2020 are selected and analyzed. We identify several gaps in the existing literature: 1) an absence of theory explaining the relation of events, 2) a shortage of studies conducted in the public sector, 3) and an absence of specific techniques such as observation to study actual technical debt management behavior.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cordella, A., Iannacci, F.: Information systems in the public sector: the e-Government enactment framework. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 19, 52–66 (2010)
Cunningham, W.: The WyCash portfolio management system. ACM SIGPLAN OOPS Messenger 4, 29–30 (1992)
Rios, N., de Mendonça Neto, M.G., Spínola, R.O.: A tertiary study on technical debt: types, management strategies, research trends, and base information for practitioners. Inf. Softw. Technol. 102, 117–145 (2018)
Griffith, I., Taffahi, H., Izurieta, C., Claudio, D.: A simulation study of practical methods for technical debt management in agile software development. In: Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference (2015)
Alves, N.S.R., Mendes, T.S., De Mendonça, M.G., Spínola, R.O., Shull, F., Seaman, C.: Identification and management of technical debt: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 70, 100–121 (2016)
Scholl, H.J.: Digital government: looking back and ahead on a fascinating domain of research and practice. Digit. Gov. Res. Pract. 1, 1–12 (2020)
Dečman, M., Jukić, T.: Editorial for EJEG 15(1), 57 (2017)
Danish Ministry of Finance: Regeringens kasseeftersyn på it-området. Denmark, Copenhagen (2017)
The Swedish National Audit: Föråldrade it-system – Hinder för en effektiv digitalisering, Stockholm (2019)
Holvitie, J., et al.: Technical debt and agile software development practices and processes: an industry practitioner survey. Inf. Softw. Technol. 96, 141–160 (2018)
Ampatzoglou, A., Ampatzoglou, A., Chatzigeorgiou, A., Avgeriou, P.: The financial aspect of managing technical debt: a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 64, 52–73 (2015)
Li, Z., Avgeriou, P., Liang, P.: A systematic mapping study on technical debt and its management. J. Syst. Softw. 101, 193–220 (2015)
Jeffery, M., Leliveld, I.: Best practices in IT portfolio management. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 45, 41 (2004)
Magnusson, J., Juiz, C., Gómez, B., Bermejo, B.: Governing technology debt. In: Proceedings of 2018 International Conference Technical Debt - TechDebt 2018, pp. 76–84 (2018)
Schlichter, B.R., Kraemmergaard, P.: A comprehensive literature review of the ERP research field over a decade. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 23(4), 486–520 (2010)
Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past for prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26(2), xiii–xxiii (2002)
Boell, S.K., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34, 12 (2014)
Harzing, A.W.: Publish or Perish (2007). https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish
Becker, C., Chitchyan, R., Betz, S., McCord, C.: Trade-off decisions across time in technical debt management. In: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Technical Debt - TechDebt 2018, pp. 85–94 (2018)
BenIdris, M., Ammar, H., Dzielski, D.: Investigate, identify and estimate the technical debt: a systematic mapping study. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 9, 01–14 (2018)
King, N.: Doing template analysis. In: Symon, G., Cassell, C. (eds.) Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2012)
Blaikie, N., Priest, J.: Designing Social Research: The logic of anticipation. Cambridge Polity, Cambridge (2019)
Gregor, S.: The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 30, 611–642 (2006)
Whetten, D.: What constitutes a theoretical contribution. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14, 490–495 (1989)
Derman, E.: Metaphors, models & theories. Q. J. Financ. 1, 109–126 (2011)
Blomberg, J., Burrell, M.: An ethnographic approach to design. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications. Lawrence Erbaum Associates, New York (2012)
Sutton, R.I., Staw, B.M.: What theory is not. Adm. Sci. Q. 40, 371–384 (1995)
Fernandez-Sanchez, C., Garbajosa, J., Yague, A.: A framework to aid in decision making for technical debt management. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 7th International Workshop Managing Technical Debt, MTD 2015, pp. 69–76 (2015)
Danish Competition and Consumer Authority: Hvor lang løbetid må en rammeaftale have? https://www.kfst.dk/faq/udbud/nyt-udbud/fase-1/hvor-lang-loebetid-maa-en-rammeaftale-have/. Accessed 19 May 2020
Bannister, F., Connolly, R.: The great theory hunt: does e-government really have a problem? Gov. Inf. Q. 32, 1–11 (2015)
Mathiassen, L.: Designing engaged scholarship: from real-world problems to research publications. Engag. Manag. Rev. 1(1), 17–28 (2017). Article 2
Acknowledgement
This study is funded by the Research Centre for Government IT, which is a collaboration between the IT University of Copenhagen, the Danish Digitization Agency and the self-owned institution ATP. The Research Centre’s external funding partners were not involved in the research presented herein, or its dissemination.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix A: Previous TD Literature Reviews
Appendix B: The Pool of Papers Analyzed in the Literature Review
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nielsen, M.E., Østergaard Madsen, C., Lungu, M.F. (2020). Technical Debt Management: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda for Digital Government. In: Viale Pereira, G., et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12219. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57598-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57599-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)