Abstract
Public sector organizations are invariable stuck in a contortionist position in regards to how they approach digitalization. Centralized delivery models for IT drive efficiency in the short term, but at the same time they have been identified to potentially counter-act innovation. This study utilizes an interpretative case study of 21 Swedish public agencies and their centralized IT function to analyze how existing IT governance configuration impacts organizational ambidexterity. The empirical base consists of 31 interviews and studies of secondary material in the form of steering documents. The findings show that IT Governance is experienced as decreasing the level of innovation in the organization and hence negatively impacting ambidexterity by systematically skewing the balance between efficiency and innovation. These findings are discussed in relation to previous research, and propositions for future research for better understanding IT governance configuration in the context of ambidexterity are presented and discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Canguilhem, G.: The Normal and the Pathological. Zone Books, New York (2016)
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., Lyytinen, K.: Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 724–735 (2010)
Gregory, R.W., Keil, M., Muntermann, J., Mähring, M.: Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Inf. Syst. Res. 26(1), 57 (2015)
Magnusson, J., Koutsikouri, D., Pärivärinta, T.: Efficiency creep and shadow innovation: ambidextrous IT governance in the public sector. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. (2020, in press)
Wiener, M., Mähring, M., Remus, U., Saunders, C.S.: Control configuration and control enactment in information systems projects: review and expanded theoretical framework. MIS Q. 40(3), 741–774 (2016)
Magnusson, J., Bygstad, B.: Why I act differently: studying patterns of legitimation among CIOs through motive talk. Inf. Technol. People 26(3), 265–282 (2013)
Magnusson, J., Nilsson, A., Kizito, M.: Enacting digital ambidexterity: the case of the swedish public sector. In: AMCIS Conference Proceedings, Cancun, Mexico (2019)
Gregory, R.W., Kaganer, E., Henfridsson, O., Ruch, T.J.: IT consumerization and the transformation of IT governance. MIS Q. 42(4), 1225–1253 (2018)
March, J.G.: Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1), 71–87 (1991)
Benner, M.J., Tushman, M.L.: Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Manag. Rev. 28(2), 238–256 (2003)
Luger, J., Raisch, S., Schimmer, M.: Dynamic balancing of exploration and exploitation: the contingent benefits of ambidexterity. Organ. Sci. 29(3), 449–470 (2018)
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J.: Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Manag. 34(3), 375–409 (2008)
Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S., Cardinal, L.B.: Managing persistent tensions on the frontline: a configurational perspective on ambidexterity. J. Manage. Stud. 55(5), 739–769 (2018)
Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., Greenwood, R.: Digital innovation and transformation: an institutional perspective. Inf. Organ. 28(1), 52–61 (2018)
Mergel, I., Gong, Y., Bertot, J.: Agile government: systematic literature review and future research. Gov. Inf. Q. 35(4), 291–298 (2018)
Weill, P., Ross, J.: A matrixed approach to designing IT governance. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 46(2), 26 (2005)
De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W.: An exploratory study into IT governance implementations and its impact on business/IT alignment. Inf. Syst. Manag. 26(2), 123–137 (2009)
Wu, S.P.J., Straub, D.W., Liang, T.P.: How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance: insights from a matched survey of business and IT managers. MIS Q. 39(2), 497–518 (2015)
Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., Bertin, E.: From sovereign IT governance to liberal IT governmentality? A Foucauldian analogy. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 27(3), 326–346 (2018)
Schlosser, F., Beimborn, D., Weitzel, T., Wagner, H.T.: Achieving social alignment between business and IT–an empirical evaluation of the efficacy of IT governance mechanisms. J. Inf. Technol. 30(2), 119–135 (2015)
Tonelli, A.O., de Souza Bermejo, P.H., Dos Santos, P.A., Zuppo, L., Zambalde, A.L.: IT governance in the public sector: a conceptual model. Inf. Syst. Front. 19(3), 593–610 (2017)
Xue, L., Ray, G., Sambamurthy, V.: Efficiency or innovation: how do industry environments moderate the effects of firms IT asset portfolio? MIS Q. 36(2) (2012)
Piccinini, E., Hanelt, A., Gregory, R., Kolbe, L.: Transforming industrial business: the impact of digital transformation on automotive organizations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for Information Systems, Fort Worth, Texas, US (2015)
Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4(2), 74–81 (1995)
www.lansstyrelsen.se. Accessed Mar 2020
Silverman, D.: Interpreting Qualitative Data. SAGE Publications Limited, London (2019)
Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4), 532–550 (1989)
Mithas, S., Rust, R.T.: How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance: conjecture and empirical evidence. MIS Q. 40(1) (2016)
Myers, N., Starliper, M.W., Summers, S.L., Wood, D.A.: The impact of shadow IT systems on perceived information credibility and managerial decision making. Acc. Horiz. 31(3), 105–123 (2017)
Cokins, G.: The top seven trends in management accounting. EDPACS 53(4), 1 (2016)
Rolland, K.H., Mathiassen, L., Rai, A.: Managing digital platforms in user organizations: the interactions between digital options and digital debt. Inf. Syst. Res. 29(2), 419–443 (2018)
Banker, R.D., Hu, N., Pavlou, P.A., Luftman, J.: CIO reporting structure, strategic positioning, and firm performance. MIS Q. 35, 487–504 (2011)
Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., King, J.L.: Routines as shock absorbers during organizational transformation: Integration, control, and NASA’s enterprise information system. Organ. Sci. 27(3), 551–572 (2016)
Yeow, A., Soh, C., Hansen, R.: Aligning with new digital strategy: a dynamic capabilities approach. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 27(1), 43–58 (2018)
Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E.: Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad. Manag. J. 50(1), 25–32 (2007)
www.digg.se. Accesses Mar 2020
Bannister, F.: The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons. Int. Rev. Admin. Sci. 73(2), 171 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Magnusson, J., Khisro, J., Melin, U. (2020). A Pathology of Public Sector IT Governance: How IT Governance Configuration Counteracts Ambidexterity. In: Viale Pereira, G., et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12219. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57598-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57599-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)