Skip to main content

Dense Captioning Using Abstract Meaning Representation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems (BRACIS 2020)

Abstract

The world around us is composed of images that often need to be translated into words. This translation can take place in parts, converting regions of the image into textual descriptions what is also known as dense captioning. By doing so, the information present in this region is converted into words expressing the way objects relate to each other. Computational models have been proposed to perform this task in a similar way to human beings, mainly using deep neural networks. As the same region of the image can be described in several different forms, this study proposes to use the Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) in the generation of descriptions for a given region. We hypothesize that by using AMR it would be possible to extract the meaning of the text and, as a consequence, improve the quality of the sentences produced by the models. AMR was investigated as a semantic representation formalism evolving the so far proposed models that are based only on purely natural language. The results show that the models trained with sentences in the form of AMR led to better descriptions and the performance achieved was superior in almost all evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Image from Visual Genome Dataset [10].

  2. 2.

    The success of syntactic banks is due to the fact that unifying the various tasks in a single process allowed the use of a single tool. An example of a classic syntactic bank is the Penn Treebank.

  3. 3.

    The value before the slash indicates the total of unique tokens (types) and the value after the slash, the total number of occurrences of those tokens.

References

  1. Abend, O., Rappoport, A.: The state of the art in semantic representation. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), vol. 1, pp. 77–89 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banarescu, L., et al.: Abstract meaning representation for sembanking. In: Proceedings of the 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop and Interoperability with Discourse, pp. 178–186 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banerjee, S., Lavie, A.: METEOR: an automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization, pp. 65–72. Association for Computational Linguistics, Ann Arbor, June 2005. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W05-0909

  4. Cai, S., Knight, K.: Smatch: an evaluation metric for semantic feature structures. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pp. 748–752. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia, August 2013. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P13-2131

  5. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2014, pp. 580–587. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2014.81

  6. Johnson, J., Karpathy, A., Fei-Fei, L.: DenseCap: fully convolutional localization networks for dense captioning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karpathy, A., Fei-Fei, L.: Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions. In: The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karpathy, A., Joulin, A., Fei-Fei, L.: Deep fragment embeddings for bidirectional image sentence mapping. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 2. NIPS 2014, pp. 1889–1897. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2969033.2969038

  9. Konstas, I., Iyer, S., Yatskar, M., Choi, Y., Zettlemoyer, L.: Neural AMR: sequence-to-sequence models for parsing and generation. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 146–157. Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, July 2017. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1014, https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P17-1014

  10. Krishna, R., et al.: Visual genome: connecting language and vision using crowdsourced dense image annotations. Int. J. Comput. Vision 123(1), 32–73 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-016-0981-7

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Liao, K., Lebanoff, L., Liu, F.: Abstract Meaning Representation for multi-document summarization. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 1178–1190. Association for Computational Linguistics, Santa Fe, August 2018. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C18-1101

  12. Lin, T.-Y., et al.: Microsoft COCO: common objects in context. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8693, pp. 740–755. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, F., Flanigan, J., Thomson, S., Sadeh, N., Smith, N.A.: Toward abstractive summarization using semantic representations. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 1077–1086. Association for Computational Linguistics, Denver, May–Jun 2015. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/N15-1114, https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N15-1114

  14. Lyu, C., Titov, I.: AMR parsing as graph prediction with latent alignment. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., Zhu, W.J.: BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL 2002, pp. 311–318. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2002). https://doi.org/10.3115/1073083.1073135

  16. Reiter, E., Dale, R.: Building applied natural language generation systems. Nat. Lang. Eng. 3(1), 57–87 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., Sun, J.: Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39(6), 1137–1149 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Song, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Gildea, D.: A graph-to-sequence model for AMR-to-text generation. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-18), Melbourne, Australia (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tamchyna, A., Quirk, C., Galley, M.: A discriminative model for semantics-to-string translation. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Semantics-Driven Statistical Machine Translation (S2MT 2015), pp. 30–36. Association for Computational Linguistics, Beijing, July 2015. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W15-3504, https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W15-3504

  20. Thomee, B., et al.: YFCC100M: the new data in multimedia research. Commun. ACM 59(2), 64–73 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2812802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, L., Tang, K., Yang, J., Li, L.J.: Dense captioning with joint inference and visual context. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), July 2017

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yin, G., Sheng, L., Liu, B., Yu, N., Wang, X., Shao, J.: Context and attribute grounded dense captioning. In: The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2019

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yu, L., Poirson, P., Yang, S., Berg, A.C., Berg, T.L.: Modeling context in referring expressions. In: Leibe, B., Matas, J., Sebe, N., Welling, M. (eds.) ECCV 2016. LNCS, vol. 9906, pp. 69–85. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Funding Code 001. The first author was funded by the grant #2018/1771510, CAPES. This research is also part of the MMeaning project, supported by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), grant #2016/13002-0.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio M. S. Almeida Neto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Neto, A.M.S.A., Caseli, H.M., Almeida, T.A. (2020). Dense Captioning Using Abstract Meaning Representation. In: Cerri, R., Prati, R.C. (eds) Intelligent Systems. BRACIS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12319. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61377-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61377-8_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61376-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61377-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics