Skip to main content

Mirroring Tools and Interaction Indicators in Collaborative Work: A Systematic Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technologies and Innovation (CITI 2020)

Abstract

Mirroring tools make it possible to reflect the process of a collaborative task and increases its relevance when it comes to an educational task. Monitoring indicators used for Mirroring are able to show and motivate the interaction of the participants who are carrying out the collaborative task, particularly for an online activity. This feedback can be represented as a direct visualization of the indicator’s value through Mirroring tools. Mirroring tools contribute mainly to the get a better visibility of the collaborative process among the participants by showing their level of participation while they carry out the online collaboration. Due to the importance of the topic in the field of research, this work will focus on carrying out a systematic research mapping process which will include a search, study, selection, analysis and identification of potential relationships between Mirroring tools and collaborative indicators. With the application of systematic mapping, there is the possibility to evaluate the frequency of publications that have existed in different high-impact scientific libraries, since no statistical studies have been found on the proposed topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dimitracopoulou, A.: Designing collaborative learning systems: current trends and future research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years!, Taipei, Taiwan, May 2005, pp. 115–124, Accedido, 29 May 2020. [En línea]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jermann, P., Soller, A., Muehlenbrock, M.: From Mirroring to guiding: a review of the state of art technology for supporting collaborative learning. In: Presentado en European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning EuroCSCL-2001, 2001, p. 324. Accedido, 29 May 2020. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00197377

  3. Soller, A., Martínez, A., Jermann, P., Muehlenbrock, M.: From Mirroring to guiding: a review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 15(4), 261–290 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zangara, M.A., Sanz, C.V.: Visualización del proceso colaborativo como metaconocimiento. Descripción de una estrategia de Mirroring y sus resultados. XXIII Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación, p. 12 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kitchenham, B., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tarmazdi, H., Vivian, R., Szabo, C., Falkner, K., Falkner, N.: Using learning analytics to visualise computer science teamwork. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education - ITiCSE’15, Vilnius, Lithuania, pp. 165–170 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2729094.2742613

  7. Neto, L.E.C., e Silva, G.B.: ColMiner: a tool to support communications management in an issue tracking environment. In: Proceedings of the XIV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems - SBSI’18, Caxias do Sul, Brazil, pp. 1–8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3229345.3229398

  8. Duarte, M.P., Balderas, A., Dodero, J.M., Reinoso, A.J., Caballero, J.A., Delatorre, P.: Integrating quantitative and qualitative data in assessment of wiki collaborative assignments. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality - TEEM’18, Salamanca, Spain, pp. 328–332 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284232

  9. van Leeuwen, A., Rummel, N.: Comparing teachers’ use of Mirroring and advising dashboards. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Frankfurt Germany, pp. 26–34, March 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375471

  10. Torres, J., García, S., Peláez, E.: Visualizing authorship and contribution of collaborative writing in e-learning environments. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Marina del Ray California, pp. 324–328, March 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302328

  11. Papanikolaou, K.A.: Constructing interpretative views of learners’ interaction behavior in an open learner model. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 8(2), 201–214, April 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2014.2363663

  12. Yanacón-Atía, D., Costaguta, R., de los, M., Menini, Á.: Indicadores colaborativos individuales y grupales para Moodle. Campus Virtuales 7(1), 125–139, March 2018

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mangaroska, K., Sharma, K., Giannakos, M., Trætteberg, H., Dillenbourg, P.: Gaze insights into debugging behavior using learner-centred analysis. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Sydney New South Wales Australia, pp. 350–359, March 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170386

  14. Lobo, J.L., Santos, O.C., Boticario, J.G., Del Ser, J.: Identifying recommendation opportunities for computer-supported collaborative environments. Expert Syst. 33(5), 463–479 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12159

  15. Salihoun, M., Guerouate, F., Sbihi, M.: Experimentation of a multidimensional model for tracking interactions between learners during an online collaborative work. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (iJET) 12(10), 221–229 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ullmann, T.D., De Liddo, A., Bachler, M.: A visualisation dashboard for contested collective intelligence learning analytics to improve sensemaking of group discussion. RIED 22(1), 41 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.1.22294

  17. Wang, D., Olson, J.S., Zhang, J., Nguyen, T., Olson, G.M.: DocuViz: visualizing collaborative writing. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI’15, Seoul, Republic of Korea, pp. 1865–1874 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702517

  18. Konert, J., Bohr, C., Bellhauser, H., Rensing, C.: PeerLA - assistant for individual learning goals and self-regulation competency improvement in online learning scenarios. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Austin, TX, USA, pp. 52–56 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/icalt.2016.100

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitchell Vásquez-Bermúdez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vásquez-Bermúdez, M., Sanz, C., Zangara, M.A., Hidalgo, J. (2020). Mirroring Tools and Interaction Indicators in Collaborative Work: A Systematic Review. In: Valencia-García, R., Alcaraz-Marmol, G., Del Cioppo-Morstadt, J., Vera-Lucio, N., Bucaram-Leverone, M. (eds) Technologies and Innovation. CITI 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1309. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62015-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62015-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62014-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62015-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics