Skip to main content

Cyber Taxi: A Taxonomy of Interactive Cyber Training and Education Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model-driven Simulation and Training Environments for Cybersecurity (MSTEC 2020)

Abstract

The lack of guided exercises and practical opportunities to learn about cybersecurity in a practical way makes it difficult for security experts to improve their proficiency. Capture the Flag events and Cyber Ranges are ideal for cybersecurity training. Thereby, the participants usually compete in teams against each other, or have to defend themselves in a specific scenario. As organizers of yearly events, we present a taxonomy for interactive cyber training and education. The proposed taxonomy includes different factors of the technical setup, audience, training environment, and training setup. By the comprehensive taxonomy, different aspects of interactive training are considered. This can help trainings to improve and to be established successfully. The provided taxonomy is extendable and can be used in further application areas as research on new security technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amorim, J.A., Hendrix, M., Andler, S.F., Gustavsson, P.M.: Gamified training for cyber defence: methods and automated tools for situation and threat assessment. Nato Modelling & Simulation Group (NMSG) Multi-Workshop, MSG-111 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amoroso, E.: Fundamentals of Computer Security Technology. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Beuran, R., Pham, C., Tang, D., Chinen, K.I., Tan, Y., Shinoda, Y.: Cybersecurity education and training support system: CyRIS. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. E101.D, 740–749 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beyer, R.E., Brummel, B.: Implementing effective cyber security training for end users of computer networks. SHRM-SIOP Sci. HR Ser. Promoting Evid.-Based HR 3(10), 2018 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop, M.: What do we mean by “computer security education"? In: 22nd National Information Systems Security Conference (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. CERT Division: CERT Coordination Center - 2002 Annual Report. Technical report,Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chef Software Inc.: Chef (2020). https://www.chef.io. Accessed 28 Aug 2020

  8. CONCORDIA: Courses and Trainings for Professionals (2020). https://www.concordia-h2020.eu/map-courses-cyber-professionals/. Accessed 28 Aug 2020

  9. Davis, A., Leek, T., Zhivich, M., Gwinnup, K., Leonard, W.: The fun and future of CTF. In: 2014 USENIX Summit on Gaming, Games, and Gamification in Security Education (3GSE 14) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, J., Magrath, S.: A survey of cyber ranges and testbeds. Technical report, Defence Science and Technology Organisation Edinburgh (Australia) Cyber and Electronic Warfare Div (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Díez, E.G., Pereira, D.F., Merino, M.A.L., Suárez, H.R., Juan, D.B.: Cyber exercises taxonomy. INCIBE (2015). https://www.incibe.es/extfrontinteco/img/File/intecocert/EstudiosInformes/incibe_cyberexercises_taxonomy.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2020

  12. Easttom, C., Butler, W.: A modified McCumber cube as a basis for a taxonomy of cyber attacks. In: 2019 IEEE 9th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), pp. 943–949 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. European Cyber Security Organisation: WG5 Paper - Understanding Cyber Ranges: From Hype to Reality. Technical report (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hansman, S., Hunt, R.: A taxonomy of network and computer attacks. Comput. Secur. 24, 31–43 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hembroff, G., Hanson, L., Vanwagner, T., Wambold, S., Wang, X.: The Development of a computer & network security education interactive gaming architecture for high school age students. USENIX J. Educ. Syst. Adm. 25 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Howard, J.D., Longstaff, T.A.: A Common Language for Computer Security Incidents. Technical repo, Sandia National Laboratories (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. (ISC)2: Strategies for Building and Growing Strong Cybersecurity Teams. Cybersecurity Workforce Study (2019). https://www.isc2.org/-/media/ISC2/Research/2019-Cybersecurity-Workforce-Study/ISC2-Cybersecurity-Workforce-Study-2019.ashx. Accessed 28 Aug 2020

  18. ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 9126. Software engineering - Product quality. ISO/IEC (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. ISO/IEC 25010: ISO/IEC 25010:2011, Systems and software engineering - Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - System and software quality models. ISO/IEC (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jin, G., Tu, M., Kim, T.H., Heffron, J., White, J.: Game based cybersecurity training for high school students. In: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE ’18, pp. 68–73. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jouini, M., Rabai, L.B.A., Aissa, A.B.: Classification of security threats in information systems. In: The 5th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT-2014), Procedia Computer Science, vol. 32, pp. 489–496 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kick, J.: Cyber Exercise Playbook. MITRE (2014., https://www.mitre.org/sites/default/files/publications/pr_14-3929-cyber-exercise-playbook.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2020

  23. Kumar, S.: Classification and Detection of Computer Intrusions. Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, USA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Landwehr, C.E., Bull, A.R., McDermott, J.P., Choi, W.S.: A taxonomy of computer program security flaw. ACM Comput. Surv. 26, 211–254 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lehto, M.: Cyber security education and research in the Finland’s Universities and universities of applied sciences. Int. J. Cyber Warfare Terrorism 6, 15–31 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lindqvist, U., Jonsson, E.: How to systematically classify computer security intrusions. In: IEEE Symposium Security and Privacy, pp. 154–163 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lipson, H.F.: Tracking and tracing cyber-attacks: technical challenges and global policy issues. Software Engineering Institute, CERT CoordinationCenter (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mirkovic, J., Peterson, P.A.H.: Class capture-the-flag exercises. In: 2014 USENIX Summit on Gaming, Games, and Gamification in Security Education (3GSE 14). USENIX Association, San Diego (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Neumann, P.G., Parker, D.B.: A summary of computer misuse techniques. In: 12th National Computer Security Conference, Baltimore, MD, pp. 396–406 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Newhouse, W., Keith, S., Scribner, B., Witte, G.: National initiative for cybersecurity education (nice) cybersecurity workforce framework. NISTSpecial Publication 800-181 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Newhouse, W., Keith, S., Scribner, B., Witte, G.: National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE), Cybersecurity Workforce Framework, NIST Special Publication 800–181. National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Homeland Security, National Initiative for Cybersecurity Careers and Studies (NICCS) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Paulauskas, N., Garsva, E.: Computer system attack classification. IEEE Autom. Rob. 66, 84–87 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pelánek, R.: Applications of the Elo rating system in adaptive educational systems. Comput. Educ. 98, 169–179 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Priyadarshini, I.: Features and Architecture of The Modern Cyber Range: A Qualitative Analysis and Survey. Ph.D. thesis, University of Delaware (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Puppet Inc: puppet (2020). https://www.puppet.com. Accessed 28 Aug 2020

  36. Rajamäki, J., Nevmerzhitskaya, J., Virág, C.: Cybersecurity education and training in hospitals: Proactive resilience educational framework (Prosilience EF). In: 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 2042–2046. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Red Hat Inc: Red Hat Ansible (2020). https://www.ansible.com. Accessed 28 Aug 2020

  38. SaltStack Inc: Saltstack (2020). https://www.saltstack.com. Accessed 28 Aug 2020

  39. Simmons, C., Ellis, C., Shiva, S., Dasgupta, D., Wu, Q.: AVOIDIT: a cyber attack taxonomy. In: 9th Annual Symposium on Information Assurance (ASIA’14), pp. 2–12 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Souissi, S.: A novel response-oriented attack classification. In: 2015 International Conference on Protocol Engineering (ICPE) and International Conference on New Technologies of Distributed Systems (NTDS), pp. 1–6 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Steinberger, J., Sperotto, A., Golling, M., Baier, H.: How to exchange security events? Overview and evaluation of formats and protocols. In: Badonnel, R., Xiao, J., Ata, S., Turck, F.D., Groza, V., dos Santos, C.R.P. (eds.) IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, IM 2015, pp. 261–269. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Subaşu, G., Roşu, L., Bădoi, I.: Modeling and simulation architecture for training in cyber defence education. In: 2017 9th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pp. 1–4 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Švábenský, V., Vykopal, J., Cermak, M., Laštovička, M.: Enhancing cybersecurity skills by creating serious games. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2018, pp. 194–199. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Taylor, C., Arias, P., Klopchic, J., Matarazzo, C., Dube, E.: CTF: state-of-the-art and building the next generation. In: 2017 USENIX Workshop on Advances in Security Education (ASE 17). USENIX Association, Vancouver (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Urias, V.E., Van Leeuwen, B., Stout, W.M.S., Lin, H.W.: Dynamic cybersecurity training environments for an evolving cyber workforce. In: 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST), pp. 1–6 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  46. US Department of Defense: The Department of Defense Cyber Table Top Guidebook (2018). https://www.dau.edu/cop/test/DAU Sponsored Documents/The DoD Cyber Table Top Guidebook v1.pdf. Accessed 28 ug 2020

  47. Valús̆ek, M.: Classification of Network Attacks and Detection Methods. Technical report, Masaryk University, Czech Republic (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Vykopal, J., Os̆lejs̆ek, R., Celeda, P., Vizváry, M., Tovarn̆ák, D.: KYPO cyber range: design and use cases. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Software Technologies, ICSOFT, vol. 1, pp. 310–321 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Vykopal, J., Vizváry, M., Os̆lejs̆ek, R., Celeda, P., Tovarn̆ák, D.: Lessons learned from complex hands-on defence exercises in a cyber range. In: 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wright, A.C.: Orange is the new purple. Blackhat conference presentation (2017). https://www.blackhat.com/docs/us-17/wednesday/us-17-Wright-Orange-Is-The-New-Purple-wp.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2020

  51. Wu, Z., Ou, Y., Liu, Y.: A taxonomy of network and computer attacks based on responses. In: 2011 International Conference of Information Technology, Computer Engineering and Management Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 26–29 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yamin, M.M., Katt, B., Gkioulos, V.: Cyber ranges and security testbeds: scenarios, functions, tools architecture. Comput. Secur. 88, 101636 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yurcik, W., Doss, D.: Different approaches in the teaching of information systems security. In: Proceedings of the Information Systems Education Conference, pp. 32–33 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Knüpfer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Knüpfer, M. et al. (2020). Cyber Taxi: A Taxonomy of Interactive Cyber Training and Education Systems. In: Hatzivasilis, G., Ioannidis, S. (eds) Model-driven Simulation and Training Environments for Cybersecurity. MSTEC 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12512. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62433-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62433-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62432-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62433-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics