Skip to main content

Detecting Online Fake Reviews via Hierarchical Neural Networks and Multivariate Features

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12532))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In recent years, as the value and credibility of online reviews tend to influence people’s shopping feelings and consumption decisions, various online fake reviews have been constantly emerging. Detecting online fake reviews has attracted widespread attention from both the business and research communities. The existing methods are usually to detect fake reviews on off-the-shelf algorithms using kinds of linguistic and behavioral features respectively. That ignores the fusion of different features and does not take into account that different features have different effects on model performance. In this research, a set of linguistic and non-linguistic features is explored, and an optimal feature subset is selected by using random forest algorithm and the sequential backward selection strategy. Then, a hierarchical neural networks for detecting online fake reviews is empirically proposed, which can learn local and global information from multivariate features. Experimental results show that the model proposed in this paper on multiple datasets is superior to the traditional discrete model and the existing neural network benchmark model, and has a good generalization ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arjun, M., et al.: Fake review detection: classification and analysis of real and pseudo reviews. Technical Report (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bahdanau, D., et al.: Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. ICLR 2015, 1–15 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becchetti, L., et al.: Link analysis for Web spam detection. ACM Trans. Web. 2(1), 1–42 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chengzhang, J., Kang, D.-K.: Detecting the spam review using tri-training. In: ICACT 2015, pp. 374–377 IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Faville, K., List, A.: Cone releases the 2011 online influence trend tracker. https://www.conecomm.com/news-blog/2011-online-influence-trend-tracker-release

  6. Glorot, X., et al.: Domain adaptation for large-scale sentiment classification: a deep learning approach. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2011, pp. 513–520 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, C., Zhang, X.: Neural networks merging semantic and non-semantic features for opinion spam detection. In: Tang, J., Kan, M.-Y., Zhao, D., Li, S., Zan, H. (eds.) NLPCC 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11838, pp. 583–595. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32233-5_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Analyzing and Detecting Review Spam. In: ICDM 2007, pp. 547–552 IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kolcz, A., Alspector, J.: SVM-based filtering of e-mail spam with content-specific misclassification costs. In: Proc. TextDM 2001 Workshop on Text Mining - held 2001 IEEE International Conference Data Mining, pp. 1–6 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Le, Q.V., Mikolov, T.: Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documents. In: ICML 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, H., et al.: Spotting fake reviews via collective positive-unlabeled learning. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 899–904 IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, J., et al.: Towards a general rule for identifying deceptive opinion spam. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1566–1576 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, L., et al.: Document representation and feature combination for deceptive spam review detection. Neurocomputing 254, 33–41 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim, E.P., et al.: Detecting product review spammers using rating behaviors. In: International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings, pp. 939–948 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mikolov, T., et al.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. NIPS 2013, 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mukherjee, A., et al.: What yelp fake review filter might be doing? ICWSM 2013, 409–418 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ntoulas, A., et al.: Detecting spam web pages through content analysis. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 83–92 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ott, M., et al.: Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. ACL 2011, 309–319 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ott, M., et al.: Negative deceptive opinion spam. In: NAACL HLT 2013, pp. 497–501 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Raffel, C., Ellis, D.P.W.: Feed-Forward Networks with Attention Can Solve Some Long- Term Memory Problems (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ren, Y., Ji, D.: Neural networks for deceptive opinion spam detection: an empirical study. Inf. Sci. (Ny) 385–386, 213–224 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ren, Y., Zhang, Y.: Deceptive opinion spam detection using neural network. In: COLING 2016–26th International Conference Computer Linguistic Proceedings COLING 2016 Technical Paper 140–150 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tang, D. et al.: document modeling with gated recurrent neural network for sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1422–1432

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vaswani, A. et al.: Attention is all you need. In: Advances Neural Information Processing System 2017- Decem, Nips, 5999–6009 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, X. et al.: Detecting Deceptive Review Spam via Attention-Based Neural Networks. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 866–876 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, X. et al.: Identification of fake reviews using semantic and behavioral features. In: 2018 4th International Conference on Information Management, ICIM 2018, pp. 92–97 Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xu, W., Rudnicky, A.: Can artificial neural networks learn language models? In: 6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yoo, K.-H., Gretzel, U.: Comparison of deceptive and truthful travel reviews. Inf. Commun. Technol. Tourism 2009, 37–47 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianguo Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jiang, C., Zhang, X., Jin, A. (2020). Detecting Online Fake Reviews via Hierarchical Neural Networks and Multivariate Features. In: Yang, H., Pasupa, K., Leung, A.CS., Kwok, J.T., Chan, J.H., King, I. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12532. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63830-6_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63830-6_61

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63829-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63830-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics