Skip to main content

Lean R&D: An Agile Research and Development Approach for Digital Transformation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2020)

Abstract

Petrobras is a large publicly-held company that operates in the oil, gas and energy industry. Recently, they conducted internal dynamics to identify several Digital Transformation (DT) opportunities to leverage their operational excellence. Addressing such opportunities typically requires Research and Development (R&D) uncertainties that could lead traditional R&D cooperation terms to be negotiated in years. However, there are time-to-market constraints for fast-paced deliveries to experiment solution options. With this in mind, they partnered up with PUC-Rio to establish a new DT initiative. The goal of this paper is to present the Lean R&D approach, tailored within this new initiative, and results of two case studies regarding its application in practice. We designed Lean R&D integrating the following building blocks: (i) Lean Inceptions, to allow stakeholders to jointly outline a Minimal Viable Product (MVP); (ii) early parallel technical feasibility assessment and conception phases, allowing to ‘fail fast’; (iii) scrum-based development management; and (iv) strategically aligned continuous experimentation to test business hypotheses. In the two reported case studies, Lean R&D enabled addressing research-related uncertainties early and to efficiently deliver valuable MVPs within four months, showing itself suitable for supporting the DT initiative. Key success factors were the business strategy alignment, the defined roles and co-creation philosophy with strong integration between Petrobras and PUC-Rio’s teams, and continuous support of a highly qualified research team. Main opportunities for improvement, based on our lessons learned, rely on better adapting Lean Inceptions to the DT context and on scaling the approach to a project portfolio level of abstraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Since March 23rd activities moved to home-office due to COVID-19. Following the recommendations in [24] as much as possible and using proper remote tool support (Microsoft Azure DevOps and Teams) allowed us to keep the Lean R&D approach running remotely.

References

  1. Matt, C., Hess, T., Benlian, A.: Digital transformation strategies. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57(5), 339–343 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fitzgerald, B., Stol, K.J.: Continuous software engineering: a roadmap and agenda. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 176–189 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caroli, P.: Lean Inception: how to align people and build the right product. Editora Caroli (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fagerholm, F., Guinea, A.S., Mäenpää, H., Münch, J.: The RIGHT model for continuous experimentation. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 292–305 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalinowski, M., Batista, S.T., Lopes, H. et al.: Towards lean R&D: an agile research and development approach for digital transformation. In: Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), Portoroz, Slovenia, 5 p. (2020, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reinertsen, D., Shaeffer, L.: Making R&d lean. Res. Technol. Manage. 48(4), 51–57 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ries, E.: The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation To Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Business, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Debois, P.: Devops: a software revolution in the making. J. Inf. Technol. Manage. 24(8), 3–39 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bosch, J.: Building products as innovation experiment systems. In: Cusumano, M.A., Iyer, B., Venkatraman, N. (eds.) ICSOB 2012. LNBIP, vol. 114, pp. 27–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30746-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohno, T.: Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wagner, S., Mendez, D., Felderer, M., et al.: Status quo in requirements engineering: a theory and a global family of surveys. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM) 28(2), 1–48 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas, D., Hunt, A.: The Pragmatic Programmer: Your Journey to Mastery, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mendes, T.S., de Freitas Farias, M.A., Mendonçam M., et al.: Impacts of agile requirements documentation debt on software projects: a retrospective study. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC), Pisa, Italy, pp. 1290–1295 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smart, J.F.: BDD in Action: Behavior-Driven Development for the Whole Software Lifecycle. Manning, Shelter Island (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aurum, A., Petersson, H., Wohlin, C.: State-of-the-art: software inspections after 25 years. Softw. Test. Verif. Reliab. 12(3), 133–154 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boehm, B., Basili, V.R.: Software defect reduction top 10 list. IEEE Comput. 34(1), 135–137 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mendez, D., Wagner, S., Kalinowski, M., et al.: Naming the pain in requirements engineering – contemporary problems, causes, and effects in practice. Empirical Softw. Eng. 22(5), 2298–2338 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bacchelli, A., Bird, C.: Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review. In: International Conference on Software Engineering, San Francisco, USA, pp. 712–721 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kalinowski, M., Mendes, E., Card, D. N., Travassos, G. H.: Applying DPPI: a defect causal analysis approach using bayesian networks. In: International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES), Oulu, Finland, pp. 92–106 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Runeson, P., Host, M., Rainer, A., Regnell, B.: Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Basili, V.R., Rombach, H.D.: The TAME project: towards improvement-oriented software environments. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 14(6), 758–773 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., Budgen, D.: Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(5), 463–479 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ralph, P., Baltes, S., Adisaputri, G., et al.: Pandemic programming: how COVID-19 affects software developers and how their organizations can help. Empirical Softw. Eng. 34 p. (2020, in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all ExACTa PUC-Rio and Petrobras employees involved in the projects for their trust and dedication to the new initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos Kalinowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kalinowski, M. et al. (2020). Lean R&D: An Agile Research and Development Approach for Digital Transformation. In: Morisio, M., Torchiano, M., Jedlitschka, A. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12562. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64148-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64148-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64147-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64148-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics