Abstract
This chapter aims to investigate the link between venture financing and socially responsible investing. Over the past few decades, it has been widely recognised that venture capital (VC) firms are able to create value for their investors (e.g. Gompers et al. 2008; Megginson et al. 2019). However, these skills seem to be no longer sufficient to drive further expansion of the industry, and VC firms are going to be facing some new and important challenges in the coming years. Accordingly, numerous limited partners (LPs) of VC funds around the world are now looking at ESG goals as a priority. Of course, behind this radical change in VC firms’ investment philosophy lies more than just philanthropy: there is also a belief that ESG criteria might help them “do good while doing well”. Against this backdrop, we focus on the key characteristics of VC investments and the degree of implementation of ESG criteria within the VC industry. Second, it discusses how ESG compliance might help VC firms to raise funds, select and build successful firms and facilitate their divestments. Finally, the chapter enquires into the characteristics and perspectives of the social VC and the gender gap in entrepreneurship and the VC industry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Don Valentine, founder of Sequoia Capital, one of the most successful US VC firms, provided an in-depth explanation, during an inspiring speech given at Stanford University, of the main criteria used to target firms. Among the points made was this: “I hammered out this more intuitive investment selection process based on huge markets and solutions that made a significant short-term commercial sense. Six hundred investments, thirty-odd years later, we’re still using basically the same selection criteria in choosing companies that have huge, huge markets. It turns out it’s much easier to build a new startup company in an environment where the markets are large than it is to try to develop a market based on some technology for which there’s not an obvious solution. And that’s been sort of the approach we’ve continued with which I stared somewhere about 1967 or so.” The full speech can be found on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKN-abRJMEw.
- 2.
“Obvious Ventures aims to surpass impact investing model”. Wall Street Journal, March 18, 2019.
- 3.
We investigate this issue more thoroughly in Sect. 5.6.
- 4.
One famous example is the “Tay” chatbot launched by Microsoft to connect with millennials, but which started tweeting racist and anti-feminist comments.
- 5.
The EIF VC Survey 2019 is “a survey among VC general partner (GP)/management companies headquartered in the EU27, the UK and other European countries”.
- 6.
This set of rules is part of a legislative package proposed by the European Commission to encourage sustainable investment within the EU financial system.
- 7.
PRI (2015), “The Limited Partners’ Responsible Investment Due Diligence Questionnaire”.
- 8.
The term “social VC” is often used as a synonym for “impact VC”, while many academics and practitioners consider green VC to be a subset of social VC. For example, Randjelovic et al. (2003) define green VC as “financial capital provision invested in high-risk environment-oriented ventures, which offers the possibility of ecologically sound business practices, as well as significant gains to compensate for the risks involved in such investments” (p. 251).
- 9.
For further information, see Maas and Liket (2011).
- 10.
For this reason, the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA) (2014), the largest VC industry organisation in the US, formed a task force to promote greater inclusion of women in both VC firms and investee companies.
References
Achleitner AK, Heinecke A, Noble A, Schöning M, Spiess-Knafl W (2011) Social investment manual: an introduction for social entrepreneurs. Available at SSRN 1884338
Albinger HS, Freeman SJ (2000) Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. J Bus Ethics 28(3):243–253
Alnamlah MS (2020) Is the gender gap in venture funding driven by biased investors? In Academy of management proceedings (Vol. 2020, No. 1, p. 20763). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management
Asrar-ul-Haq M, Kuchinke KP, Iqbal A (2017) The relationship between corporate social responsibility, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: Case of Pakistani higher education. J Clean Prod 142:2352–2363
Awaysheh A, Heron RA, Perry T, Wilson JI (2020) On the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Strateg Manag J 41(6):965–987
Balachandra L (2020) How gender biases drive venture capital decision-making: exploring the gender funding gap. Gend Manag
Balboa M, Marti J (2007) Factors that determine the reputation of private equity managers in developing markets. J Bus Ventur 22:453–480
Baldini M, Dal Maso L, Liberatore G, Mazzi F, Terzani S (2018) Role of country-and firm-level determinants in environmental, social, and governance disclosure. J Bus Ethics 150(1):79–98
Barber BM, Morse A, Yasuda A (2021) Impact investing. J Finance Eco 139(1):162–185
Barnett ML, Salomon RM (2012) Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strateg Manag J 33(11):1304–1320
Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage 17(1):99–120
Baron RA (1998) Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: why and when enterpreneurs think differently than other people. J Bus Ventur 13(4):275–294
Becker-Blease JR, Sohl JE (2007) Do women-owned businesses have equal access to angel capital? J Bus Ventur 22(4):503–521
Botsari A, Lang F (2020) ESG considerations in venture capital and business angel investment decisions: evidence from two pan-European surveys (No. 2020/63). EIF Working Paper
Bowman EH, Haire M (1975) A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. Calif Manage Rev 18(2):49–58
Brashears ME (2008) Gender and homophily: differences in male and female association in Blau space. Soc Sci Res 37(2):400–415
Bringer RP, Benforado DM (1994) Pollution prevention and total quality environmental management. Environmental strategies handbook, 165–188
Brush C, Greene P, Balachandra L, Davis A (2018) The gender gap in venture capital-progress, problems, and perspectives. Ventur Cap 20(2):115–136
Buchanan B, Cao CX, Chen C (2018) Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership. J Corp Finance 52:73–95
Bürer MJ, Wüstenhagen R (2008) Cleantech venture investors and energy policy risk: an exploratory analysis of regulatory risk management strategies. Sustainable innovation and entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing, 290–309
Campbell K, Mínguez-Vera A (2008) Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. J Bus Ethics 83(3):435–451
Chemmanur TJ, Krishnan K, Nandy DK (2011) How does venture capital financing improve efficiency in private firms? A look beneath the surface. Rev Financ Stud 24(12):4037–4090
Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD, Vasvari FP (2008) Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical analysis. Account Organ Soc 33(4–5):303–327
Coleman S, Robb A (2012) Gender-based firm performance differences in the United States: examining the roles of financial capital and motivations. In Global women’s entrepreneurship research. Edward Elgar Publishing
Croce A, Martí J, Murtinu S (2013) The impact of venture capital on the productivity growth of European entrepreneurial firms:‘screening’or ‘value added’effect? J Bus Ventur 28(4):489–510
Crunchbase News (2019) Inside VC firms: the gender divide, August 14, 2019
Cui J, Jo H, Na H (2018) Does corporate social responsibility affect information asymmetry? J Bus Ethics, 148(3):549–572
Cumming D, Johan S (2008) Information asymmetries, agency costs and venture capital exit outcomes. Ventur Cap 10(3):197–231
Cumming DJ, Johan SA (2013) Venture capital and private equity contracting: an international perspective. Academic Press
Dangelico RM, Pujari D (2010) Mainstreaming green product innovation: why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. J Bus Ethics 95(3):471–486
Deng X, Xu Y (2017) Consumers’ responses to corporate social responsibility initiatives: the mediating role of consumer–company identification. J Bus Ethics 142(3):515–526
Dhaliwal DS, Li OZ, Tsang A, Yang YG (2011) Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: the initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. Account Rev 86(1):59–100
Dhaliwal D, Li OZ, Tsang A, Yang YG (2014) Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: the roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. J Account Public Policy 33(4):328–355
Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychol Rev 109(3):573
Eddleston KA, Powell GN (2008) The role of gender identity in explaining sex differences in business owners’ career satisfier preferences. J Bus Ventur 23(2):244–256
Egginton JF, McBrayer GA (2019) Does it pay to be forthcoming? evidence from CSR disclosure and equity market liquidity. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 26(2):396–407
Ewens M, Townsend RR (2020) Are early stage investors biased against women? J Financ Econ 135(3):653–677
Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine (September 13) (Retried on 13 January 2012 from: http:// www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp-business. html)
Gangi F, Meles A, Monferrà S, Mustilli M (2020) Does corporate social responsibility help the survivorship of SMEs and large firms? Glob Finance J 43:100402
Goldin C (2006) The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. Am Econ Rev 96(2):1–21
Gompers PA, Lerner J (1999) What drives venture capital fundraising? (No. w6906). National bureau of economic research
Gompers P, Kovner A, Lerner J, Scharfstein, D (2008) Venture capital investment cycles: the impact of public markets. J Finance Eco 87(1):1–23
Gompers PA, Mukharlyamov V, Weisburst E, Xuan Y (2014) Gender gaps in venture capital performance. Available at SSRN 2445497
Goss A, Roberts GS (2011) The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. J Bank Financ 35(7):1794–1810
Greening DW, Turban DB (2000) Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus Soc 39(3):254–280
Guzman J, Kacperczyk AO (2019) Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res Policy 48(7):1666–1680
Hartenian LS, Gudmundson DE (2000) Cultural diversity in small business: implications for firm performance. J Dev Entrep 5(3):209
Hemingway CA, Maclagan PW (2004) Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 50(1):33–44
Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2012) What drives corporate social performance? the role of national-level institutions. J Int Bus Stud 43(9):834–864
Jensen MC (2001) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. J Appl Corp Finance 14(3):8–21
Kaplan S, Schoar A (2005) Private equity performance: returns, persistence and capital flows. J Finance 60:1791–1823
Kim Y, Park MS, Wier B (2012) Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? Account Rev 87(3):761–796
Kovner A, Lerner J (2015) Doing well by doing good? community development venture capital. J Econ Manag Strategy 24(3):643–663
KPMG Venture Pulse Q4 (2018) Global analysis of venture funding, January 15, 2019
Krishnan CNV, Ivanov VI, Masulis RW, Singh AK (2011). Venture capital reputation, post-IPO performance, and corporate governance. J Financial Quant Anal, 1295–1333
Lerner J, Tåg J (2013) Institutions and venture capital. Ind Corp Chang 22(1):153–182
Lopatta K, Buchholz F, Kaspereit T (2016) Asymmetric information and corporate social responsibility. Bus Soc 55(3):458–488
Maas K, Liket K (2011) Social impact measurement: classification of methods. In Environmental management accounting and supply chain management (pp. 171–202). Dordrecht: Springer
McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Profit maximizing corporate social responsibility. Acad Manage Rev 26(4):504–505
Megginson WL, Meles A, Sampagnaro G, Verdoliva V (2019) Financial distress risk in initial public offerings: how much do venture capitalists matter? J Corp Finance 59:10–30
Millar R, Hall K (2013) Social return on investment (SROI) and performance measurement: the opportunities and barriers for social enterprises in health and social care. Public Manag Rev 15(6):923–941
Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud 24(3):403–441
Perrini F, Vurro C (2010) Social venture capital & venture philanthropy. Modelli e processi d’investimento nell’innovazione sociale, Egea, Milano
Pitchbook (2020a), NVCA venture report, January 13, 2020
Pitchbook (2020b), European venture report, January 29, 2020
Pivato S, Misani N, Tencati A (2008) The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: the case of organic food. Bus Ethics 17(1):3–12
Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92
PRI (2015) The limited partners’ responsible investment due diligence questionnaire
Randjelovic J, O’Rourke AR, Orsato RJ (2003) The emergence of green venture capital. Bus Strategy Environ 12(4):240–253
Ryan PW, Lyne I (2008) Social enterprise and the measurement of social value: methodological issues with the calculation and application of the social return on investment. Education, Knowledge & Economy 2(3):223–237
Rotheroe N, Richards A (2007) Social return on investment and social enterprise: transparent accountability for sustainable development. Soc Enterp J
Ruiz-Jiménez JM, del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes M, Ruiz-Arroyo M (2016) Knowledge combination capability and innovation: the effects of gender diversity on top management teams in technology-based firms. J Bus Ethics 135(3):503–515
Russo A, Perrini F (2010) Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. J Bus Ethics 91(2):207–221
Sethi SP, Martell TF, Demir M (2016) Building corporate reputation through corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports: the case of extractive industries. Corp Reput Rev 19(3):219–243
Siegel DS, Vitaliano DF (2007) An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. J Econ Manag Strategy 16(3):773–792
Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Am J Sociol 106(6):1546–1588
State Street Global Advisors (2019) Into the mainstream: ESG at the tipping point
Trester JJ (1998) Venture capital contracting under asymmetric information. J Bank Financ 22(6–8):675–699
Verrecchia RE (1983) Discretionary disclosure. J Account Econ 5:179–194
Waddock SA, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strateg Manag J 18(4):303–319
Wagner L (2002) The ‘new’ donor: creation or evolution? Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 7(4):343–352
Yoon Y, Gürhan‐Canli Z, Schwarz N (2006) The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. J Consum Psychol 16(4):377–390
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meles, A. (2021). Venture Capital and Responsible Investing: Progress, Problems and Perspectives. In: The Evolution of Sustainable Investments and Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70350-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70350-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70349-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70350-9
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)