Skip to main content

New Social Movements: Theories and Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rural Economic Developments and Social Movements

Part of the book series: Palgrave Advances in Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies ((PABEP))

Abstract

This chapter firstly highlights the existing plethora of research and discussions in social sciences that are devoted to examining continuous changes and understanding of the ongoing reconstruction of the social world in various discourses. The changing way of how society is organized, it’s believes, and practices signalize the ongoing tremendous social changes. It occurs worldwide in myriad discourses of different bigger and smaller social groups or, even though, societies, in alternating basic social structures, social institutions, rules of social behaviour, moreover—value systems of a whole society, a particular community, its social relations. Before getting deeper into the main aim of this monograph—the rural social movements as an emerging phenomenon itself and its role in changing the rural development paradigm, this chapter sets the place for new social movements in the overall scientific research, devoted to examine, explore and explain a myriad of attitudes concerning social change. This chapter calls the reader to get into the theoretical foundations of various attitudes that served in composing the grounding for social movements, defining the structure and areas of impact by new social movements, as well as the development process and distinctive points between the old and new, or industrial versus post-industrial social movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, S., McCright, A. M., & Dietz, T. (2017). A social movement identity instrument for integrating survey methods into social movements research. SAGE Open, 7(2), 2158244017708819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arato, A., & Cohen, J. (1984). Social movements, civil society, and the problem of sovereignty. Praxis International Oxford, 4(3), 266–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, E. A., & Bernstein, M. (2008). Culture, power, and institutions: A multi‐institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 74–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1976, May). The coming of the post-industrial society. The Educational Forum, 40(4), 574–579. Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, E. E., & McWhorter, R. R. (2019). Social movement learning and social innovation: Empathy, agency, and the design of solutions to unmet social needs. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(2), 224–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, M., & Mark, B. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boren, M. E. (2001). Student resistance: A history of the unruly subject. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brint, S. (1994). Sociological analysis of political culture: An introduction and assessment. Weil, FD and Gautier M. Political Culture and Political Structure: Theoretical and Empirical Studies, 2, 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buechler, S. M. (1993). Beyond resource mobilization? Emerging trends in social movement theory. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(2), 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buechler, S. M. (1995). New social movement theories. Sociological Quarterly, 36(3), 441–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (2018). A Comparison of unschoolers and evangelical homeschoolers in Central Texas through the lens of resource mobilization theory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerroni, A. (2018). Steps towards a theory of the knowledge-society. Social Science Information, 57(2), 322–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, W., & Wall, J. V. (1990). The COINTELPRO papers: Documents from the FBI’s secret wars against domestic dissent. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control: Crime, punishment and classification (pp. 145–148). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotgrove, S., & Duff, A. (1981). Environmentalism, values, and social change. British Journal of Sociology, 92–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozat, M., Hipsher, P. L., Katzenstein, M. F., Keck, M. E., Klandermans, B., Kubik, J., … & Reiter, H. (1997). The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, S. R. (2020). Green-or rose-coloured lenses for Globalization Matters? Transdisciplinary epistemic practices and paradigmatic transformations in ecologies and equalities. Globalizations, 18, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J., Kuechler, M., & Bürklin, W. (1990). The challenge of new movements. Challenging the political order: New social and political movements in Western democracies, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements: An introduction (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diani, M., & Lodi, G. (1988). Three in one: Currents in the milan ecology movement. International Social Movement Research, 1, 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, B., & Hayes, G. (2019). Tactics and strategic action. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dymitrow, M., Biegańska, J., & Grzelak‐Kostulska, E. (2018). Deprivation and the Rural‐Urban Trap. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 109(1), 87–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falcone, P. M., D’Alisa, G., Germani, A. R., & Morone, P. (2020). When all seemed lost. A social network analysis of the waste-related environmental movement in Campania, Italy. Political Geography, 77, 102114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Kovacheff, C. (2017). Extreme protest tactics reduce popular support for social movements (Rotman School of Management Working Paper 2911177).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J., & Johnson, V. (1999). Waves of protest: Social movements since the sixties. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C. (2006). The self-organization of social movements. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 19(1), 101–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A. (1995). Constructing social protest. Social Movements and Culture, 4, 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A., & Meyer, D. S. (1996). Framing political opportunity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparatos, A., El-Haram, M., & Horner, M. (2008). A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(4–5), 286–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, L. P., & Hine, V. H. (1968). Five factors crucial to the growth and spread of a modern religious movement. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goncharov, V. N. (2018). Traditional, industrial and post-industrial societies: social and philosophical analysis in the context of historical development. In Society, culture, personality in modern world (pp. 14–17).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, J., & Jasper, J. M. (1999, March). Caught in a winding, snarling vine: The structural bias of political process theory. Sociological Forum, 14(1), 27–54. Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasso, M. T., Yoxon, B., Karampampas, S., & Temple, L. (2019). Relative deprivation and inequalities in social and political activism. Acta Politica, 54(3), 398–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (1970). Sources of rebellion in Western societies: Some quantitative evidence. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 391(1), 128–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, J. (1994). Political processes and institutions-making It work: The prostitutes’ rights movement in perspective by Valerie Jenness. Contemporary Sociology, 23(3), 379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, M. (2019). Mass society paradigm. In Why democracies flounder and fail (pp. 31–65). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haferkamp, H., & Smelser, N. J. (Eds.). (1992). Social change and modernity (pp. 1–33). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfmann, J. (2018). 3. Social change and political mobilization in west Germany. In Industry and Politics in West Germany (pp. 51–86). Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanspeter, K., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J. W., & Giugni, M. G. (2015). New social movements in western Europe: A comparative analysis. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. (1996). The cultural dimension of social movements: A theoretical reassessment and literature review. Sociology of Religion, 57(1), 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassard, J., & Cox, J. W. (2019). Philosophy of science, social theory, and organizational analysis: Paradigmatic transformations since the postmodern turn. In The Emerald handbook of management and organization inquiry. Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaphy, B. (2007). Late modernity and social change: Reconstructing social and personal life. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, R. D. (1950). The revolutionary process: A frame of reference for the study of revolutionary movements. Social Forces, 28, 270–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, E. L. (2015). The slow food movement and time shortage: Beyond the dichotomy of fast or slow. Journal of Sociology, 51(3), 628–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1984). The nature and design of post-industrial organizations. Management Science, 30(8), 928–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imhonopi, D., Onifade, C. A., & Urim, U. M. (2013). Collective behaviour and social movements: A conceptual review. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(10), 76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1990). Values, ideology, and cognitive mobilization in new social movements. In R. J. Dalton & M. Keuchler (Eds.), Challenging the political order: New social and political movements in western democracies (pp. 43–66). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. C. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9(1), 527–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. C., & Perrow, C. (1977). Insurgency of the powerless: Farm worker movements (1946-1972). American Sociological Review, 42, 249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenness, V. (1995). Social movement growth, domain expansion, and framing processes: The gay/lesbian movement and violence against gays and lesbians as a social problem. Social Problems, 42(1), 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B., Moulaert, F., Hulgård, L., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). Social innovation research: a new stage in innovation analysis. The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, 110–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, H., & Klandermans, B. (1995). The cultural analysis of social movements. Social Movements and Culture, 4, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltefleiter, W., & Pfaltzgraff, R. L. (1985). Towards a comparative analysis of the peace movements. The Peace Movements in Europe and the United States (New York: St. Martin’s, 1985), 194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpov, A. O. (2017). The problem of separating the notions of “knowledge” and “information” in the knowledge society and its education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 804–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, L. A. (1990). The anti-politics of identity. Socialist Review, 1, 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, B. (1994). Review essay: Targeting the critical mass. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(4), 368–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kniffin, L. E., & Patterson, R. M. (2019). Re-imagining community leadership development in the post-industrial era. Journal of Leadership Education, 18(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knottnerus, J. D. (1983). The Melanesian cargo cults: A test of the value‐added theory of collective behavior. Sociological Inquiry, 53(4), 389–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornhauser, W. (1959). Power and participation in the local community. Health Education Monographs, 1(6), 28–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H. (Ed.). (1995). New social movements in Western Europe: A comparative analysis (Vol. 5). U of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunst, J. R., & Obaidi, M. (2020). Understanding violent extremism in the 21st century: The (re) emerging role of relative deprivation. Current Opinion in Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larana, E. (2009). New social movements: From ideology to identity. Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentin, A. (1999). Structure, strategy, sustainability: What future for new social movement theory? Sociological Research Online, 4(3), 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C., Faik, I., Tan, F. T., Tan, B., & Khoo, Y. H. (2020). Digital organizing of a global social movement: From connective to collective action. Information and Organization, 30(4), 100324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J. (2017). Protest: Studies of collective behaviour and social movements. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loures, L., Panagopoulos, T., & Burley, J. B. (2016). Assessing user preferences on post-industrial redevelopment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(5), 871–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P., & Goyder, J. (1983). Environmental groups in politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P., Phillipson, J., Proctor, A., & Gkartzios, M. (2019). Expertise in rural development: A conceptual and empirical analysis. World Development, 116, 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macionis, J. J. (2001). Sociology (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. (1988). Freedom summer. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S. (2018). The political context of social movements. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (2016). Development and social change: A global perspective. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeon, N. (2013). ‘One does not sell the land upon which the people walk’: Land grabbing, transnational rural social movements, and global governance. Globalizations, 10(1), 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melluci, A. (1995). The process of collective identity. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 41–63). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. (1980). The new social movements: A theoretical approach. Social Science Information, 19(2), 199–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. (1994). A strange kind of newness: What’s “new” in new social movements. New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity, 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. S. (2012). Protest and political process. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to political sociology (pp. 397–407). London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F. D. (1999). The end of SDS and the emergence of weatherman: Demise through success. In J. Freeman & V. Johnson (Eds.), Waves of protest: Social movements since the Sixties (pp. 303–324). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, P. H. (2000). Specifying the “rural” in social movement theory. Polish Sociological Review, 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. D. (1978). Some notes towards relative deprivation, social movements and social change. In Collective behaviour and social movements. Itasca, 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller‐Rommel, F. (1985). Social movements and the Greens: New internal politics in Germany. European Journal of Political Research, 13(1), 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, A., Kotha, S., & Fisher, G. (2020). Community-based resource mobilization: How entrepreneurs acquire resources from distributed non-professionals via crowdfunding. Organization Science, 13(4), 797–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaeva, E. M., & Fedchenko, S. S. (2016). Contemporary mass society: The transformation of the Internet age. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS), 1(1), 192–198. ISSN 2356-5926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C., Wiesenthal, H., & Keane, J. (1985). Two logics of collective action (pp. 170–220). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, P., & Johnston, H. (2000). What a good idea! Ideologies and frames in social movement research. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 5(1), 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichardo, N. A. (1997). New social movements: A critical review. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 411–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, S. A., Madsen, T., & Morton, T. A. (2020). Relative deprivation and revolt: current and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D., & Tarafdar, M. (2017). How does twitter influence a social movement? https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2017_rip/60/.

  • Roggeband, C., & Klandermans, B. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of social movements across disciplines. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, F. (2006). Social movement tactics, organizational change and the spread of African-American studies. Social Forces, 84(4), 2147–2166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudig, W. (1988). Peace and ecology movements in Western Europe. West European Politics, 11(1), 26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, B. (2013). Feminism and the women’s movement: Dynamics of change in social movement ideology and activism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyers, T. M., & Meyers, D. M. (1999). Missed opportunities: Social movement abeyance and public policy. Social Problems, 46(2), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiberg, M., & Lounsbury, M. (2017). Social movements and the dynamics of institutions and organizations. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 281–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, R. (2018). Social theory after the Internet: Media, technology and globalization (p. 210). UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackman, G., Ya-Lin, L., & Wang, X. (2002). Why does a society develop the way it does. http://gsociology.icaap.org/report/summary2.htm.

  • Shaiko, R. G. (1993). Greenpeace USA: Something old, new, borrowed. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1), 88–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithey, L. A. (2009). Social movement strategy, tactics, and collective identity 1. Sociology Compass, 3(4), 658–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, N. (1963). Theory of collective behaviour. Nova Iorque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, N. J. (2011). Theory of collective behavior. Quid Pro Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Forces 28 (3), 270-280. Retrieved May 12, 2008 from EBSCO Online Database SocINDEX http://searchebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sih&AN=13582480&site=ehost-live.

  • Söderberg, J. (2013). Determining social change: The role of technological determinism in the collective action framing of hackers. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1277–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, U., Patterson, M., Kelly, C., & Mair, J. (2016). Organizations driving positive social change: A review and an integrative framework of change processes. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1250–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker, R. (2018). About the localized social movement. In Handbook of community movements and local organizations in the 21st century (pp. 211–227). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, H., & Randall, S. C. (Eds.). (1981). An introduction to theories of social change. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (1994). The sources of social power, volume 2: The rise of classes and nation-states, 1760–1914. By Michael Mann. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993. American Political Science Review, 88(4), 1031–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C., & Wood, L. J. (2015). Social movements 1768–2012. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C., Castaneda, E., & Wood, L. J. (2019). Social movements, 1768–2018. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. (1971). The may movement: Revolt and reform: may 1968—the student rebellion and workers’ strikes—the birth of a social movement. Random House (NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. (1981). The voice and the eye: An analysis of social movements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, M. C., Martin, D. H., Macaulay, A. C., & Pluye, P. (2017). Can we build on social movement theories to develop and improve community‐based participatory research? A framework synthesis review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 59(3–4), 333–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke, N., & Amos, B. (2017). Social movement coalitions: Formation, longevity, and success. Sociology Compass, 11(7), e12489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasin, S. M., Gamidullaeva, L. A., & Rostovskaya, T. K. (2017). The challenge of social innovation: Approaches and key mechanisms of development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, K. C. (2016). The post-industrial society: From utopia to ideology. Work, Employment & Society, 30(2), 366–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2017). The difference makers: How social and institutional entrepreneurs created the corporate responsibility movement. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, E. J. (1981). Resource mobilization and citizen protest in communities around three mile Island. Social Problems, 29(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeber, S. C., & Rodeheaver, D. G. (2003). Militias at the millennium: A test of Smelser’s theory of collective behavior. Sociological Quarterly, 44(2), 181–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieviorka, M. (2005). After new social movements. Social Movement Studies, 4(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, A. (2013). Growing a radical ruralism: Back‐to‐the‐land as practice and ideal. Geography Compass, 7(2), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, R. (2016). Karl Mannheim on democratic interaction: Revisiting mass society theory. Human Affairs, 26(2), 93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita Vilkė .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vilkė, R. (2021). New Social Movements: Theories and Approaches. In: Rural Economic Developments and Social Movements. Palgrave Advances in Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71983-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71983-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71982-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71983-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics