Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Call to View Disciplinary Knowledge Through the Lens of Geography Teachers’ Professional Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recontextualising Geography in Education

Part of the book series: International Perspectives on Geographical Education ((IPGE))

Abstract

Understanding the ways knowledge is created, tested and evaluated within geography remains an underdeveloped area of geography education. This knowledge is included within the Maude’s typology of powerful geographical knowledge and is recognised within the description of powerful disciplinary knowledge that has culminated from the GeoCapabilities project. This chapter presents a call to view disciplinary knowledge through the lens of geography teachers’ professional practice. This exploration is orientated towards the idea that disciplinary knowledge ought not be isolated from how it is developed and marshalled by geography teachers, because it is through teachers’ professional practice that disciplinary knowledge becomes part of students’ geographical education. This chapter considers Huckle’s (Intl Res Geograph Environ Educ 28(1):70–84, 2019) concern that powerful geographical knowledge is not fully underpinned by critical realism and through this discussion draws out the significance of considering the epistemic relations of geographical knowledge for geography teachers’ curricular decision-making. The second part of the chapter builds the case for a more explicit theorisation of disciplinary knowledge, which attends to the interplay between the relations of teacher, student and content and more broadly to geography teachers’ professional practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alderson, P. (2020). Powerful knowledge and the curriculum: Contradictions and dichotomies. British Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, E. (2018, August 28–31). (Re)Articulating sustainable development: Defining “Sustainable and modern energy for all”. Paper presented at RGS-IBG Annual International Conference, Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, G. (2018, August 28–31). Shaping the contours of sustainability: Mining sector sustainability discourse and practices. Paper presented at RGS-IBG Annual International Conference, Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauder, H. (2006). Learning to become a geographer: Reproduction and transformation in academia. Antipode, 38(4), 671–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béneker, T. (2019, April 15–17). Recontextualising migration as a theme in Geography Education, in the context of the GeoCapabilities 3 project. Paper presented at IGU-CGE UCL Institute of Education Geography Education Conference, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Taylor Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (No. 4). Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bladh, G., Stolare, M., & Kristiansson, M. (2018). Curriculum principles, didactic practice and social issues: Thinking through teachers’ knowledge practices in collaborative work. London Review of Education, 16(3), 398–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomley, N. (2006). Uncritical critical geography? Progress in Human Geography, 30(1), 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, M. (2003). Regenerating the city and the discipline. Geography, 88, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. (2007). Towards understanding the influence of subject knowledge in the practice of ‘expert’ geography teachers. PhD thesis. Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. (2009). Developing and reflecting on subject expertise. In C. Brooks (Ed.), Studying PGCE geography to M level (pp. 66–76). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. (2015). Research and professional practice. In G. Butt & S. Brindley (Eds.), MasterClass in geography education: Transforming teaching and learning (pp. 31–44). Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. (2016). Teacher subject identity in professional practice: Teaching with a professional compass. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. (2017). International differences in thinking geographically, and why ‘the local’ matters. In C. Brooks, G. Butt, & M. Fargher (Eds.), The power of geographical thinking (pp. 169–180). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. (2018). Insights on the field of geography education from a review of master’s level practitioner research. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 27(1), 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., Butt, G., & Fargher, M. (2017). The power of geographical thinking. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustin, R. (2011a). Thirdspace: Exploring the ‘lived space’ of cultural ‘others’. Teaching Geography, 36(2), 55–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustin, R. (2011b). The living city: Thirdspace and the contemporary geography curriculum. Geography, 96(2), 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustin, R. (2017). An investigation into geocapability and future 3 curriculum thinking in geography. PhD thesis. University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, G. (2020). Geography education research in the UK: Retrospect and Prospect: The UK case, within the global context. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, G., & Collins, G. (2017). Understanding the gap between school and universities. In M. Jones & D. Lambert (Eds.), Debates in geography education (2nd ed., pp. 263–274). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlgren, I. (2005, September 5–10). The content of schooling – From knowledge and subject matter to knowledge formation and subject specific ways of knowing. Paper presented at ECER 2005 — European Conference on Educational Research, University College Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2012). Progressing physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography, 36(3), 298–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catling, S. (this volume). Reflecting on knowledge and primary geography. In M. Fargher, D. Mitchell, & E. Till (Eds.), Recontextualising geography in education. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlot, B. (2012). School and pupils’ work. In H. Lauder, M. Young, H. Daniels, M. Balarin, & J. Lowe (Eds.), Education for the knowledge economy? Critical perspectives (pp. 211–224). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, N. (2017). Geography’s identity as an academic discipline. In M. Jones & D. Lambert (Eds.), Debates in geography education (2nd ed., pp. 250–262). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Counsell, C. (2016). History teacher publication and the curricular ‘what?’: Mobilizing subject-specific professional knowledge in a culture of genericism. In C. Counsell, K. Burn, & A. Chapman (Eds.), MasterClass in history education (pp. 243–252). Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, P., Sidaway, J., Bradshore, M., & Shaw, D. (2012). An introduction to human geography. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z. (2018). Rethinking teaching and teachers: Bringing content back into conversation. London Review of Education, 16(3), 371–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, J. (2014). Abstract rationality in education: From Vygotsky to Brandom. In M. Young & J. Muller (Eds.), Knowledge, expertise and the professions (pp. 33–46). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, M. (this volume). Questioning recontextualisation: Considering recontextualisation’s geographies. In M. Fargher, D. Mitchell, & E. Till (Eds.), Recontextualising geography in education. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, R. (2011a). Debates about knowledge and the curriculum: Some implications for geography education. In G. Butt (Ed.), Geography, education and the future (pp. 141–164). Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, R. (2011b). Making geography visible as an object of study in the secondary school curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 22(3), 289–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, R. (2015). Constructing geographical knowledge. In G. Butt & S. Brindley (Eds.), MasterClass in geography education: Transforming teaching and learning (pp. 53–66). Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, R. (2017). Recontexualising geography as a school subject. In M. Jones & D. Lambert (Eds.), Debates in geography education (2nd ed., pp. 275–286). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, T. (2018, August 28–31). Sustainable development, risk and responsibility in the mining industry. Paper presented at RGS-IBG Annual International Conference, Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gericke, N., Hudson, B., Olin-Scheller, C., & Stolare, M. (2018). Powerful knowledge, transformations and the need for empirical studies across school subjects. London Review of Education, 16(3), 428–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, K. J., & Lewin, J. (2018). A hierarchical framework for concepts in physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 42(6), 721–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, G. (2018). Taking (geography) curriculum seriously. Royal Geographical Society (Ideas for Teachers). Available at: https://www.rgs.org/geography/news/taking-(geography)-curriculum-seriously-–-subject

  • Healy, G., Walshe, N., & Dunphy, A. (2020). How is geography rendered visible as an object of concern in written lesson observation feedback? Curriculum Journal, 31(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, B., & Dorling, D. (2013). Inequalities in London. Trust for London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, J. (2018, August 28–31). The sustainable development goals as assemblage: Disrupting the status quo. Paper presented at RGS-IBG Annual International Conference, Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hordern, J. (2019). Exercise and intervention: On the sociology of powerful knowledge. London Review of Education, 17(1), 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckle, J. (2019). Powerful geographical knowledge is critical knowledge underpinned by critical realism. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(1), 70–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. (2002). Holding complexity and searching for meaning: Teaching as reflective practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(1), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. (2003). Approaching educational research from the tradition of critical-constructive Didaktik. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 11(2), 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. (2007). Comparing different traditions of teaching and learning: What can we learn about teaching and learning? European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. (2016). Didactics. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward, & J. Pandya (Eds.), The sage handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (pp. 107–124). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. (2018). Powerful knowledge and epistemic quality in school mathematics. London Review of Education, 16(3), 384–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansanen, P. (2009). Subject-matter didactics as a central knowledge base for teachers, or should it be called pedagogical content knowledge? Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17(1), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klafki, W. (2000). Didaktik analysis as the core of preparation. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 139–159). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. (2002). Teaching through a lens: The role of subject expertise in the teaching of geography. In V. Cheng, K. Tsui, K. Chow, & M. Mok (Eds.), Subject teaching and teacher education in the new century: Research and innovation (pp. 349–368). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. (2016). Geography. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward, & J. Pandya (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (pp. 391–407). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. (2018). Teaching as a research-engaged profession: Uncovering a blind spot and revealing new possibilities. London Review of Education, 16(3), 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D., & Biddulph, M. (2015). The dialogic space offered by curriculum-making in the process of learning to teach, and the creation of a progressive knowledge-led curriculum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 210–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D., & Morgan, J. (2010). Teaching geography 11–18: A conceptual approach: A conceptual approach. McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D., & Solem, M. (2017). Rediscovering the teaching of geography with the focus on quality. Geographical Education, 30, 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D., & Walshe, N. (2018). How geography curricula tackle global issues. In Geography education for global understanding (pp. 83–96). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D., Solem, M., & Tani, S. (2015). Achieving human potential through geography education: A capabilities approach to curriculum making in schools. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(4), 723–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, S. (2019). Critical physical geography. Geography, 104(1), 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, R., Wilson, M. W., Barron, E. S., Biermann, C., Carey, M. A., Duvall, C. S., Johnson, L., Lane, K. M., McClintock, N., Munroe, D., & Pain, R. (2014). Intervention: Critical physical geography. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 58(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2007). World city. Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. (2014). Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maude, A. (2016). What might powerful geographical knowledge look like? Geography, 101(2), 70–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2017). Geography curriculum making in changing times. PhD thesis. University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D., & Lambert, D. (2015). Subject knowledge and teacher preparation in English secondary schools: The case of geography. Teacher Development, 19(3), 365–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain, R. (2001). Gender, race, age and fear in the city. Urban Studies, 38, 899–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puttick, S. (2015). Chief examiners as prophet and priest: Relations between examination boards and school subjects, and possible implications for knowledge. The Curriculum Journal, 26(3), 468–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puttick, S. (2018). Student teachers’ positionalities as knowers in school subject departments. British Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rata, E. (2016). A pedagogy of conceptual progression and the case for academic knowledge. British Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 168–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawling, E. (2018). Reflections on ‘place’. Teaching Geography, 43(2), 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E. (1992). Towards a broader conception of scholarship: The American context. In T. Whiston & R. Geiger (Eds.), Research and higher education: The United Kingdom and the United States. SRHE/Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. (2014). Powerful knowledge and geographical education. Curriculum Journal, 25(2), 187–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, T., & Turner, F. (2008). How shall we talk about ‘subject knowledge’ for mathematics teaching. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 28(2), 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching, 22(4), 413–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science curriculum and liberal education (pp. 229–273). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, E. (2004). Practicing geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 744–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidaway, J. D. (2000). Recontextualising positionality: Geographical research and academic fields of power. Antipode, 32(3), 260–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, T., & Valentine, G. (1997). Cool places: Geographies of youth cultures. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standish, A. (2017). Geography. In A. Sehgal Cuthbert & A. Standish (Eds.), What should schools teach? Disciplines, subjects, and the pursuit of truth (pp. 88–103). UCL Institute of Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemhagen, K., Reich, G. A., & Muth, W. (2013). Disciplined judgment: Toward a reasonably constrained constructivism. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 10(1), 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengel, S. (1997). ‘Academic discipline’ and ‘school subject’: Contestable curricular concepts. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(5), 585–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uljens, M., & Ylimaki, R. (2015). Towards a discursive and non-affirmative framework for curriculum studies, Didaktik and educational leadership. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3, 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, E. (2017). Attempting to navigate a ‘discursive gap’: A case study investigating the nature of geographical knowledge in the new A level changing places topic. Unpublished MEd thesis. University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbury, I. (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: What might Didaktik teach curriculum. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 15–39). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbury, I., Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: A social realist argument. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. (2018). The weakness of “powerful knowledge”. London Review of Education, 16(2), 325–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. (2019, May 1). The end of powerful knowledge. Paper presented at PESGB London Branch Philosophy of Education Research Seminar, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, J., Datta, K., Evans, Y., Herbert, J., May, J., & McIlwane, C. (2010). Global cities at work: New migrant divisions of labour. Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R., & Froehlich, H. (2012). Basil Bernstein’s theory of the pedagogic device and formal music schooling: Putting the theory into practice. Theory Into Practice, 51(3), 212–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge Back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UCL Institute of Education, London, UK

    Grace Healy

Authors
  1. Grace Healy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grace Healy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK

    Mary Fargher

  2. Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK

    David Mitchell

  3. University of Winchester, Winchester, UK

    Emma Till

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Healy, G. (2021). A Call to View Disciplinary Knowledge Through the Lens of Geography Teachers’ Professional Practice. In: Fargher, M., Mitchell, D., Till, E. (eds) Recontextualising Geography in Education. International Perspectives on Geographical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73722-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73722-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73721-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73722-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation