Abstract
Use of abstract concepts (e.g., truth) is one of the most sophisticated abilities that humans possess. Explaining how we develop this ability and how abstract concepts are represented constitutes one of the main challenges faced by theories of embodied and grounded cognition. In this chapter, we address this issue by focusing on the mechanisms underlying the processing of abstract concepts. We propose that metacognition—the set of capacities through which an operating subsystem is evaluated and represented by another subsystem—can ground the meaning of concepts, and that this grounding is particularly important for abstract concepts. In addition, metacognition can be applied to concept use itself. In this connection, the monitoring component of metacognition is particularly relevant: it can provide awareness of the inadequacies of our knowledge of abstract concepts, expressing a judgment of scarce confidence. This monitoring process can lead to two different but not mutually exclusive outcomes. We propose that both these outcomes have an embodied counterpart, the activation of the mouth motor system. The first is the use of inner speech, which aims to search for possible further meanings and/or to further clarify the word meaning. The second is the preparation to request the help of other—better if authoritative—people (social metacognition): when our knowledge has gaps, the need of social deference is stronger.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acheson, D. J., Hamidi, M., Binder, J. R., & Postle, B. R. (2011). A common neural substrate for language production and verbal working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1358–1367.
Alderson-Day, B., & Fernyhough, C. (2015). Inner speech: Development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 931.
Apperly, I. A., & Butterfill, S. A. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review, 116, 953.
Arbib, M. A., Gasser, B., & Barrès, V. (2014). Language is handy but is it embodied? Neuropsychologia, 55, 57–70.
Baldo, J. V., Dronkers, N. F., Wilkins, D., Ludy, C., Raskin, P., & Kim, J. (2005). Is problem solving dependent on language? Brain and Language, 92, 240–250.
Barca, L., Mazzuca, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2017). Pacifier overuse and conceptual relations of abstract and emotional concepts. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2014.
Barca, L., Mazzuca, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2020). Overusing the pacifier during infancy sets a footprint on abstract words processing. Journal of Child Language.
Baronchelli, A., Gong, T., Puglisi, A., & Loreto, V. (2010). Modeling the emergence of universality in color naming patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 2403–2407.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
Barsalou, L. W., Dutriaux, L., & Scheepers, C. (2018). Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170144.
Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernan, K. A., Possing, E. T., & Medler, D. A. (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 905–917.
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2767–2796.
Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 263.
Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G., & Tummolini, L. (2019). Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 120–153.
Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., & Tummolini, L. (2018). Abstract concepts, language and sociality: From acquisition to inner speech. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170134.
Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2014). Words as social tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. Berlin: Springer.
Borghi, A. M., Flumini, A., Cimatti, F., Marocco, D., & Scorolli, C. (2011). Manipulating objects and telling words: A study on concrete and abstract words acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 15.
Borghi, A. M., & Tummolini, L. (2020). Touch me if you can: The intangible but grounded nature of abstract concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, commentary to Gilead, Trope & Liberman.
Borghi, A. M., & Zarcone, E. (2016). Grounding abstractness: Abstract concepts and the activation of the mouth. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1498.
Brenna, B. A. (1995). The metacognitive reading strategies of five early readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 53–62.
Carruthers, P. (2009). How we know our own minds: The relationship between mindreading and metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 121–138.
Connell, L., Lynott, D., & Banks, B. (2018). Interoception: The forgotten modality in perceptual grounding of abstract and concrete concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170143.
Constable, M. D., Kritikos, A., & Bayliss, A. P. (2011). Grasping the concept of personal property. Cognition, 119, 430–437.
Dove, G. (2014). Thinking in words: Language as an embodied medium of thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 371–389.
Dove, G. (2018). Language as a disruptive technology: Abstract concepts, embodiment and the flexible mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170135.
Dove, G. (2019). More than a scaffold: Language is a neuroenhancement. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1–24.
Dreyer, F. R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2018). Abstract semantics in the motor system?—An event-related fMRI study on passive reading of semantic word categories carrying abstract emotional and mental meaning. Cortex, 100, 52–70.
Falandays, J. B., & Spivey, M. J. (2019). Abstract meanings may be more dynamic, due to their sociality: Comment on” Words as social tools “ by Borghi et al. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 175–177.
Fini, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2019). Sociality to reach objects and to catch meaning. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127–138.
Frith, C. D. (2012). The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 367, 2213–2223.
Furby, L. (1980). The origins and early development of possessive behavior. Political Psychology, 30–42.
Fusaroli, R., Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., Roepstorff, A., & Tylén, K. (2012). Coming to terms: An experimental quantification of the coordinative benefits of linguistic interaction. Psychological Science, 23, 931–939.
Ghio, M., Vaghi, M. M. S., & Tettamanti, M. (2013). Fine-grained semantic categorization across the abstract and concrete domains. PLoS One, 8.
Glenberg, A. M. (2019). Turning social tools into tools for action. Comment on Words as social tools by Borghi et al. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 172–174.
Gottlieb, J., Oudeyer, P. Y., Lopes, M., & Baranes, A. (2013). Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: Computational and neural mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 585–593.
Granito, C., Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2015). Naming a lego world. The role of language in the acquisition of abstract concepts. PLoS One, 10.
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of Metacognition in education. Routledge.
Heyes, C. M., & Frith, C. D. (2014). The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science, 344, 1243091.
Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37, 127–143.
James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188–205.
Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. L. (2005). Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development, 76, 1261–1277.
Kominsky, J. F., Langthorne, P., & Keil, F. C. (2016). The better part of not knowing: Virtuous ignorance. Developmental Psychology, 52, 31.
Kominsky, J. F., & Keil, F. C. (2014). Overestimation of knowledge about word meanings: The “misplaced meaning” effect. Cognitive Science, 38, 1604–1633.
Kominsky, J. F., Zamm, A. P., & Keil, F. C. (2018). Knowing when help is needed: A developing sense of causal complexity. Cognitive Science, 42, 491–523.
Kuhn, D., & Dean, D., Jr. (2004). Metacognition: A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43, 268–273.
Langacker, R. W. (2009). Investigations in cognitive grammar (Vol. 42). Walter de Gruyter.
Lees, J., & Cikara, M. (2019). Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts. Nature Human Behaviour, 1–8.
Langland-Hassan, P., & Vicente, A. (2018). Inner Speech: New Voices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lidstone, J. S., Meins, E., & Fernyhough, C. (2010). The roles of private speech and inner speech in planning during middle childhood: Evidence from a dual task paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 438–451.
Lupyan, G., & Winter, B. (2018). Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren’t languages more iconic? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170137.
Mannella, F., Santucci, V. G., Somogyi, E., Jacquey, L., O’Regan, K. J., & Baldassarre, G. (2018). Know your body through intrinsic goals. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 12, 30.
Martinez, M. E. (2006). What is metacognition? Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 696–699.
Mazzuca, C., Lugli, L., Benassi, M., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2018). Abstract, emotional and concrete concepts and the activation of mouth-hand effectors. PeerJ, 6, e5987.
Newcombe, P. I., Campbell, C., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2012). Effects of emotional and sensorimotor knowledge in semantic processing of concrete and abstract nouns. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 275.
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach (Vol. 9). Oxford University Press.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 329–347.
Ponari, M., Norbury, C. F., & Vigliocco, G. (2018). Acquisition of abstract concepts is influenced by emotional valence. Developmental Science, 21, e12549.
Prinz, J. (2002). Furnishing the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Prinz, J. J. (2012). Beyond Human Nature: How Culture and Experience Shape Our Lives. Penguin UK.
Proust, J. (2012). Metacognition and mindreading: one or two functions. Foundations of Metacognition, 234–251.
Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of ‘meaning’. Philosophical Papers, 2.
Rabb, N., Fernbach, P. M., & Sloman, S. A. (2019). Individual representation in a community of knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–371.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., & Luh, W. M. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 96–104.
Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., & Tummolini, L. (2018). Cues of control modulate the ascription of object ownership. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 82, 929–954.
Shea, N. (2012). Reward prediction error signals are meta-representational. Nous, 48, 314–341.
Shea, N., Boldt, A., Bang, D., Yeung, N., Heyes, C., & Frith, C. D. (2014). Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 186–193.
Shea, N. (2018). Metacognition and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170133.
Shea, N. (2019). Concept-metacognition. Mind & Language.
Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Aguilera, L., Owen, W. J., & Sears, C. R. (2008). Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body–object interaction effect. Cognition, 106, 433–443.
Tomasello, M. (2019). Becoming Human: A Theory of Ontogeny. Belknap Press.
Topolinski, S., Maschmann, I. T., Pecher, D., & Winkielman, P. (2014). Oral approach–avoidance: Affective consequences of muscular articulation dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 885.
Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). Motormouth: Mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 423.
Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S. T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F. (2014). The neural representation of abstract words: The role of emotion. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 1767–1777.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). 1986). Thought and Language (rev). MIT Press.
Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., & Borghi, A. M. (2019). Varieties of abstract concepts and their multiple dimensions. Language and Cognition, 11, 403–430.
Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., Nicoletti, R. & Borghi, A. M. (under review). Sensorimotor and Interoceptive dimensions in concrete and abstract concepts.
Wang J., Conder J. A., Blitzer D.N., Shinkareva S. V. (2010). Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 1459–68.
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Metaanalysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684.
White, R. H. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.
Williams, J. P., & Atkins, J. G. (2009). The role of metacognition in teaching reading comprehension to primary students. In Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 38–56). Routledge.
Yeung, N., & Summerfield, C. (2012). Metacognition in human decision making: Confidence and error monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b., 367, 1310–1321.
Zannino, G., Fini, C., Benassi, M., Carlesimo, A. & Borghi, A. M. (submitted). Articulatory suppression delays processing of abstract concepts: the role of inner speech.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Borghi, A.M., Fini, C., Tummolini, L. (2021). Abstract Concepts and Metacognition: Searching for Meaning in Self and Others. In: Robinson, M.D., Thomas, L.E. (eds) Handbook of Embodied Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78471-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78471-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78470-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78471-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)