Skip to main content

NAFTA and the Environment: Decades of Measured Progress

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
NAFTA 2.0

Part of the book series: Canada and International Affairs ((CIAF))

  • 959 Accesses

Abstract

The renegotiation of what US President Trump called “the worst trade deal ever” has resulted in the most detailed environmental chapter in any trade agreement in history. The United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) reaffirms the approach to environmental protection under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), but also mentions dozens of environmental issues that its predecessor overlooked. Moreover, in line with contemporary US practice, the USMCA brings the vast majority of environmental provisions into the core of the agreement, and subjects these provisions to a sanction-based dispute settlement mechanism. It also jettisons two controversial NAFTA measures potentially harmful to the environment: the investor–state dispute settlement mechanism and the energy proportionality rule. The contribution of the USMCA to environmental governance remains limited, however. The agreement primarily replicates most of the environmental provisions included in recent trade agreements, in particular the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement on Trans-Pacific Partnership, and avoids important issues such as climate change.

A previous version of this chapter was originally published as “NAFTA 2.0: The Greenest Trade Agreement Ever?” World Trade Review 18 (4): 659–677. This chapter updates the original publication based on the Protocol of Amendment to the USMCA agreed on December 10, 2019.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman, Frank, Alejandro Álvarez Béjar, Gordon Laxer, and Ben Beachy. 2018. NAFTA 2.0: For People or Polluters? A Climate Denier's Trade Deal versus a Clean Energy Economy. Ottawa: The Council of Canadians.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allee, Todd, and Manfred Elsig. 2019. Are the Contents of International Treaties Copied and Pasted? Evidence from Preferential Trade Agreements. International Studies Quarterly 63 (3): 603–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnovitz, Steve. 1994. The NAFTA Environmental Side Agreement: Implications for Environmental Cooperation, Trade Policy, and American Treatymaking. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 8 (2): 257–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, Kasturi, Haro van Asselt, Susan Droege, and Michael Mehling. 2018. Making the International Trade System Work for Climate Change: Assessing the Options. Climate Strategies, July. https://tinyurl.com/ycrs7yxz. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Esty, Daniel C. 2001. Bridging the Trade-Environment Divide. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (3): 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Kevin. 2004. Free Trade and the Environment: Mexico, NAFTA, and Beyond. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greshko, Michael, Laura Parker, Brian C. Howard, Daniel Stone, Alejandra Borunda, and Sarah Gibbens. 2017. A Running List of How President Trump Is Changing Environmental Policy. National Geographic. https://tinyurl.com/yck2u8g5. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Hughes, Larry. 2010. Eastern Canadian Crude Oil Supply and Its Implications for Regional Energy Security. Energy Policy 38 (6): 2692–2699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinnah, Sikina. 2011. Strategic Linkages: The Evolving Role of Trade Agreements in Global Environmental Governance. The Journal of Environment & Development 20 (2): 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinnah, Sikina, and Abby Lindsay. 2016. Diffusion Through Issue Linkage: Environmental Norms in US Trade Agreements. Global Environmental Politics 16 (3): 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinnah, Sikina, and Elisa Morgera. 2013. Environmental Provisions in US and EU Trade Agreements: A Comparative Analysis. Review of European Comparative and International Environmental Law 22 (3): 224–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinnah, Sikina, and Jean-Frédéric Morin. 2020. Greening through Trade: How American Trade Policy Is Linked to Environmental Protection Abroad. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, Hyeran, and Hyun Namgung. 2012. Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Preferential Trade Agreements: Democracy, Boilerplates, and the Multilateral Trade Regime. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56 (6): 1041–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, John H. 2014. Fixing the CEC Submissions Procedure: Are the 2012 Revisions up to the Task? Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal 7 (1): 81–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laxer, Gordon. 2018. Escaping Mandatory Oil Exports: Why Canada Needs to Dump NAFTA’s Energy Proportionality Rule. Ottawa: The Council of Canadians.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laxer, Gordon, and John Dillon. 2008. Over a Barrel: Exiting from NAFTA’s Proportionality Clause. Edmonton: Parkland Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilliston, Ben. 2018. “New NAFTA” Continues Damaging Climate Legacy. Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy, October. https://tinyurl.com/y58e4qm2. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • McCarthy, James. 2004. Privatizing Conditions of Production: Trade Agreements as Neoliberal Environmental Governance. Geoforum 35 (3): 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertins-Kirkwood, Hadrian. 2018. Updated NAFTA Deal a Profound Failure for Climate Action. Behind the Numbers Blog, October 12. https://tinyurl.com/y4wev3vu. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Morin, Jean-Frédéric, and Myriam Rochette. 2017. Transatlantic Convergence of Preferential Trade Agreements Environmental Clauses. Business and Politics 19 (4): 621–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, Jean-Frédéric, Andreas Dür, and Lisa Lechner. 2018. Mapping the Trade and Environment Nexus: Insights from a New Data Set. Global Environmental Politics 18 (1): 122–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, Jean-Frédéric, Joost Pauwelyn, and James Hollway. 2017. The Trade Regime as a Complex Adaptive System: Exploration and Exploitation of Environmental Norms in Trade Agreements. Journal of International Economic Law 20 (2): 365–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, Michael. 2016. Challenges to the Credibility of the Investor-State Arbitration System. American University Business Law Review 5 (3): 429–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Business Group. n.d. Reforms, Liberalization open Mexico’s Energy Sector to Private Investment and Emphasize Clean, Sustainable Energy. http://tinyurl.com/y2dh4rek. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Peinhardt, Clint, Alisha A. Kim, and Viveca Pavon-Harr. 2019. Deforestation and the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. Global Environmental Politics 19 (1): 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, Scott. 2018. Canada’s Track Record Under NAFTA Chapter 11: North American Investor–State Disputes to January 2018. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. https://tinyurl.com/y7xxeyfm. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Tienhaara, Kyla. 2018. Regulatory Chill in a Warming World: The Threat to Climate Policy Posed by Investor-State Dispute Settlement. Transnational Environmental Law 7 (2): 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tienhaara, Kyla. 2019. NAFTA 2.0: What Are the Implications for Environmental Governance? Earth System Governance 1: 100004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, Scott. 2018. USMCA Versus NAFTA on the Environment. International Institute for Sustainable Development Blog, October 3. https://tinyurl.com/y6pr5vcv. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Weber, Bob. 2018. New Trade Deal Doesn't Address Climate Change: Environmentalists. CTV News, October 1. https://tinyurl.com/ya67u9jq. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

Official Documents

  • Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015, S. 995, 114th Congress. https://tinyurl.com/vbsyrv7x. Accessed September 29, 2021.

  • Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement (CUFTA), signed July 11, 2016, entered into force August 1, 2017. https://tinyurl.com/zsk893b4. Accessed September 29, 2021.

  • Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), signed March 8, 2018, entered into force December 30, 2018. https://tinyurl.com/2yyecefy. Accessed September 29, 2021.

  • Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), signed October 30, 2016, entered provisionally into force September 21, 2017. https://tinyurl.com/eakp3j2c. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Global Affairs Canada. 2017. Address by Foreign Affairs Minister on the Modernization of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). August 14. http://tinyurl.com/ybuuptvj. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC), signed September 14, 1993, entered into force January 1, 1994. https://tinyurl.com/j8awnfm8. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), signed December 17, 1992, entered into force January 1, 1994. https://tinyurl.com/2cayvy8a. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). 2007. Bipartisan Agreement on Trade Policy. https://tinyurl.com/q9qlo9m. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). 2017. Summary of Objectives for the NAFTA Renegotiation, July 17. http://tinyurl.com/ycgrwnnq. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). 2018. United States–Mexico–Canada Trade Fact Sheet: Modernizing NAFTA into a 21st Century Trade Agreement. http://tinyurl.com/y5xppvlm. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). 2019. 2019 Trade Policy Agenda and 2018 Annual Report. https://tinyurl.com/jayrptv5. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Protocol of Amendment to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, signed December 10, 2019. https://tinyurl.com/3n8jsy4p. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (Rio Declaration). https://tinyurl.com/3sta6ra6. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Secretaría de Economía. 2017. Prioridades de México en las negociaciones para la modernización del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte. http://tinyurl.com/y5t5buwh. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), signed February 4, 2016. https://tinyurl.com/2huw9x2x. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • United States. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means. 2019. Improvements to the USMCA. https://tinyurl.com/t7qmabd. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

  • United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), signed November 30, 2018, entered into force July 1, 2020. https://tinyurl.com/rtaucx5v. Accessed on September 29, 2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noémie Laurens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Laurens, N., Dove, Z., Morin, JF., Jinnah, S. (2022). NAFTA and the Environment: Decades of Measured Progress. In: Gagné, G., Rioux, M. (eds) NAFTA 2.0. Canada and International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81694-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics