Abstract
Design Science Research (DSR) is a highly context-dependent and iterative process. Design processes in DSR projects represent the actual strategy and execution of design knowledge inquiry and are typically unique. However, details of the actual design process are often lost as there is a lack of transparency in published DSR projects. In this research in progress paper, we present the idea of “journaling” the DSR process. We introduce the concept, showcase it with a conceptual framework, present practical applications, discuss implications and outline future research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
https://mydesignprocess.com/public/191/ Further journals of projects can be accessed here https://mydesignprocess.com/#projects-section.
References
Abraham, R., et al.: Fail early, fail often: towards coherent feedback loops in design science research evaluation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems - Building a Better World through Information Systems. Association for Information Sytems, AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) (2014)
vom Brocke, J., Winter, R., Hevner, A., Maedche, A.: Special issue editorial –accumulation and evolution of design knowledge in design science research: a journey through time and space. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 21(3), 520–544 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00611
vom Brocke, J., Fettke, P., Gau, M., Houy, C., Morana, S.: Tool-Support for Design Science Research: Design Principles and Instantiation. SSRN Electronic Journal (2017). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2972803
vom Brocke, J., Maedche, A.: The DSR grid: six core dimensions for effectively planning and communicating design science research projects. Electron. Mark. 29(3), 379–385 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00358-7
Burton-Jones, A., et al.: Editor’s comments: advancing research transparency at MIS Quarterly a pluralistic approach. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 45(2), iii–xviii (2021)
Chandra Kruse, L., Nickerson, J.V.: Portraying Design Essence. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii January 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2018.560.
Davenport, J.H., Grant, J., Jones, C.M.: Data without software are just numbers. Data Sci. J. 19, 1–3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-003
Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37(2), 337–355 (2013). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01
Hevner, A.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 87–92 (2007)
Hevner, A.R., et al.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
Jepsen, L.O., et al.: Back to thinking mode: diaries for the management of information systems development projects. Behav. Inf. Technol. 8(3), 207–217 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1080/01449298908914552
Kuechler, B., Vaishnavi, V.: On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17(5), 489–504 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40
Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J.: Design theory indeterminacy: what is it how can it be reduced and why did the polar bear drown? J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 21, 1–59 (2020)
Markus, M., et al.: A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Q. 26, 179–212 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2307/4132330
Morana, S., Kroenung, J., Maedche, A., Schacht, S.: Designing process guidance systems. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 20, 499–535 (2019). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00542
Nosek, B.A., et al.: Promoting an open research culture. Science 348(6242), 1422–1425 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374
Nunamaker, J.F., et al.: Systems development in information systems research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. (1990). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1990.11517898
Peffers, K., et al.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
Sein, M.K., et al.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35(1), 37–56 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488
Sonnenberg, C., vom Brocke, J.: Evaluation patterns for design science research artefacts. In: Helfert, M., Donnellan, B. (eds.) EDSS 2011. CCIS, vol. 286, pp. 71–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33681-2_7
Venable, J., et al.: FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 25(1), 77–89 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.36
Venable, J.: The role of theory and theorising in design science research. In: First International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (2006)
Walls, J.G., et al.: Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Inf. Syst. Res. 3, 36 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.36
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
vom Brocke, J., Gau, M., Mädche, A. (2021). Journaling the Design Science Research Process. Transparency About the Making of Design Knowledge. In: Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S., Hausvik, G.I. (eds) The Next Wave of Sociotechnical Design. DESRIST 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12807. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82404-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82405-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)