Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Informing Agent-Based Models of Social Innovation Uptake

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computational Intelligence (IWANN 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12862))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper discusses how data and theory were used to inform ten agent-based models in an EU Horizon 2020 project SMARTEES. The project investigates cases of social innovations implemented in different European cities, which promote low-carbon energy sources, ranging from communities insulating houses to cycling for urban transportation. The aim is to support local governments of cities in transitioning to energy efficiency and sustainability through simulating plausible effects of implementing similar social innovations in new contexts. We describe the concept for using theory together with quantitative and qualitative data to inform model assumption, calibration and validation, and the consequences of that concept for the research design in the ten case studies conducted in the project. We outline the role of (1) primary data collection of individual in-depth interviews, questionnaires and stakeholder workshops, and (2) secondary desk research including socio-demographic data and media analysis in developing agent-based models. We emphasize challenges encountered in how to use data from different sources to calibrate and validate agent-based models. The article is a compendium of lessons learned from the project, which can be useful for future collaborations in multi-case study, multi-research teams, and mixed-methods projects where one of the methods used is agent-based modelling.

The work reported here is part of the SMARTEES project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 763912.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19(6), 716–723 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Austin, E.W., Meili, H.K.: Effects of interpretations of televised alcohol portrayals on children’s alcohol beliefs. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 38(4), 417–435 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandura, A.: Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychol. 3, 265–299 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bithell, M., Brasington, J., Richards, K.: Discrete-element, individual-based and agent-based models: Tools for interdisciplinary enquiry in geography? Geoforum 39(2), 625–642 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boero, R., Squazzoni, F.: Does empirical embeddedness matter? Methodological issues on agent-based models for analytical social science. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 8(4), 6 (2005). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/6.html

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cornwall, A., Jewkes, R.: What is participatory research? Soc. Sci. Med. 41(12), 1667–1676 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barreteau, O., Bousquet, F., Étienne, M., Souchère, V., d’Aquino, P.: Companion modelling: a method of adaptive and participatory research. In: Étienne, M. (ed.) Companion Modelling, pp. 13–40. Springer, Dordrecht (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8557-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fazio, R.H., Powell, M.C., Herr, P.M.: Toward a process model of the attitude-behavior relation: accessing one’s attitude upon a mere observation of the attitude object. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44(4), 723–735 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fazio, R.H., Zanna, M.P.: Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 14, 161–202 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Festinger, L.: A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, California (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hamill, L., Gilbert, N.: Social circles: a simple structure for agent-based social network models. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 12(2), 3 (2009). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/2/3.html

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hansen, P., Liu, H., Morrison, G.: Agent-based modelling and socio-technical energy transitions: a systematic literature review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 49, 41–52 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C.: Testing the action-based model of cognitive dissonance: the effect of action orientation on postdecisional attitudes. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28(6), 711–723 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kenrick, D., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S., Schaller, M.: Renovating the pyramid of needs: contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5(3), 292–314 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lang, D., et al.: Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain. Sci. 7(S1), 25–43 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x

  16. Maslow, A.: Motivation and Personality. Harper and Row, New York (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Max-Neef, M.: Development and human needs. In: Ekins, P., Max-Neef, M. (eds.) Real-Life Economics: Understanding Wealth Creation, pp. 197–213. Routledge, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McGinnies, E., Ward, C.D.: Better liked than right: trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 6(3), 467–472 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McTaggart, R.: Principles for participatory action research. Adult Educ. Q. 41(3), 168–187 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Cathain, A., Thomas, K.: Combining qualitative and quantitative methods. In: Pope, C., Mays, N. (eds.) Qualitative Research in Health Care, pp. 102–111. Blackwell Publishing, Toronto (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., Belitz, K.: Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263(5147), 641–646 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Polhill, G., Salt, D.: The importance of ontological structure: why validation by ‘fit-to-data’ is insufficient. In: Edmonds, B., Meyer, R. (eds.) Simulating Social Complexity. UCS, pp. 141–172. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66948-9_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Pornpitakpan, C.: The persuasiveness of source credibility: a critical review of five decades’ evidence. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 34(2), 243–281 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramanath, A.M., Gilbert, N.: The design of participatory agent-based social simulations. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 7(4), 1 (2004). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/4/1.html

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reilly, A.C., Dillon, R.L., Guikema, S.D.: Agent-based models as an integrating boundary object for interdisciplinary research. Risk Analysis (in press). https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13134

  27. Schulze, J., Müller, B., Groeneveld, J., Grimm, V.: Agent-based modelling of social-ecological systems: achievements, challenges, and a way forward. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 20(2), 8 (2017). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/20/2/8.html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. van Vliet, J., Bregt, A.K., Brown, D.G., van Delden, H., Heckbert, S., Verburg, P.H.: A review of current calibration and validation practices in land change modeling. Environ. Model. Softw. 82, 174–182 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Tromsø, Norway

    Patrycja Antosz

  2. University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Wander Jager

  3. The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, UK

    Gary Polhill & Douglas Salt

Authors
  1. Patrycja Antosz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wander Jager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gary Polhill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Douglas Salt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrycja Antosz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    Ignacio Rojas

  2. University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain

    Gonzalo Joya

  3. Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain

    Andreu Català

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Antosz, P., Jager, W., Polhill, G., Salt, D. (2021). Informing Agent-Based Models of Social Innovation Uptake. In: Rojas, I., Joya, G., Català, A. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. IWANN 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12862. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85099-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85099-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85098-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85099-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation