Skip to main content

Performance Evaluation: Model-Driven or Problem-Driven?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12846))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 751 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper I address the divide that has emerged between the field of performance evaluation and the field of computer and communication system design. After looking back briefly on the history of the field, I subsequently reflect on the reasons why the field of performance evaluation has become so isolated. I then continue with a set of eight recommendations, based on my experience in performing projects with industry, that will help in reconnecting, and that will result in a better uptake of the newest techniques and tools in the field of design of computer and communication systems. Following these recommendations will probably push scientists a little out of their comfort zone, however, I feel the potential extra reward of seeing our work truly applied is more than worth it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ACM Special Interest Group for Computer Performance Evaluation. https://www.sigmetrics.org/, https://dblp.org/db/conf/sigmetrics/index.html. Accessed 5 July 2021

  2. van den Berg, F.G.B.: Automated performance evaluation of service-oriented systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/automated-performance-evaluation-of-service-oriented-systems (2017). Accessed 5 July 2021

  3. Bertsekas, D.P., Gallager, R.G.: Data Networks, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Brinch Hansen, P.: Operating System Principles. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bux, W.: Modeling token ring networks-a survey. In: Herzog, U., Paterok, M. (eds.) Messung, Modellierung und Bewertung von Rechensystemen. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol. 154, pp. 192-221. Springer, Heidelberg (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73016-0_13

  6. Coffmann, E.G., Denning, P.J.: Operating Systems Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Digital Twin Research. https://www.digital-twin-research.nl/. Accessed 5 July 2021

  8. Embedded Systems Institute: I served as scientific director during 2009–2013. https://esi.nl/. Accessed 5 July 2021

  9. Frenkel, A.K.: Allan L. Scherr, big blue’s time-sharing pioneer. Commun. ACM 30(10), 824–828 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrari, D.: Computer Systems Performance Evaluation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrari, D.: Considerations on the insularity of performance evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 12(2), 21–32 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haverkort, B.R.: Performance Evaluation of Computer Communication Systems: A Model-Based Approach. Wiley, Hoboken (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Hennessy, J.L., Patterson, D.A.: Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufman, Burlington (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Journal of Applied Probability. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-applied-probability. Accessed 5 July 2021

  15. Kleinrock, L.: Queueing Systems, Volume II: Computer Applications. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kurose, J.F., Ross, K.: Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach, 7th edn. Pearson, London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. IEEE Modeling and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems. https://dblp.org/db/conf/mascots/index.html. Accessed 5 July 2021

  18. Onvural, R.O.: Asynchronous Transfer Mode Networks. Artech House, Norwood (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Performance Evaluation. Elsevier. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/performance-evaluation. Accessed 5 July 2021

  20. Quantitative Evaluation of Systems. https://www.qest.org/, https://dblp.org/db/conf/qest/index.html. Accessed 5 July 2021

  21. Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications. Springer. https://www.springer.com/journal/11134. Accessed 5 July 2021

  22. Reiser, M., Lavenberg, S.S.: Mean-value analysis of closed multi-chain queuing networks. Journal of the ACM 27(2), 313–322 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Silberschatz, A., Galvin, P.B.: Operating System Concepts, 4th edn. Addison-Wesley, Readin (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanenbaum, A.S.: Computer Networks, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Hoboken (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Tanenbaum, A.S., Bos, H.: Modern Operating Systems. Pearson, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tichy, W.T.: Should computer scientists experiment more? IEEE Computer 31(5), 32–40 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Walrand, J.: Communication Networks: A First Course. Aksen Associates Incorporated Publishers, Stamford (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

First of all, I would like to thank all the lecturers and fellow scientists that I have been privileged to work with and to learn from over the last 35 years. It is this cooperation and interaction that makes science move forward! Secondly, I would like to thank the program committee chairs for QEST’2021, Alessandro Abate and Andrea Marin, for inviting me as keynote speaker, as well as for their constructive criticism on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boudewijn R. Haverkort .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Haverkort, B.R. (2021). Performance Evaluation: Model-Driven or Problem-Driven?. In: Abate, A., Marin, A. (eds) Quantitative Evaluation of Systems. QEST 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12846. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85172-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85172-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85171-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85172-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics