Skip to main content

A Diagrammatic Representation of Hegel’s Science of Logic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Diagrams 2021)

Abstract

In this paper, we interpret a 19th century diagram, which is meant to visualise G.W.F. Hegel’s entire method of the Science of Logic on the basis of bitwise operations. For the interpretation of the diagram we use a binary numeral system, and discuss whether the anti-Hegelian argument associated with it is valid or not. The reinterpretation is intended to make more precise rules of construction, a stricter binary code and a review of strengths and weaknesses of the critique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allihn, F.H.T.: Antibarbarus Logicus, enthaltend (i) einen kurzen Abriss der allgemeinen Logik (...) und (ii) die Lehre von den Trugschlüssen (...), 1st edn. Plötz, Halle (1850)

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Boer, K.: Hegel’s account of contradiction in the science of logic reconsidered. J. Hist. Philos. 48(3), 345–373 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ficara, E.: The Form of Truth: Hegel’s Philosophical Logic. De Gruyter, Berlin; Boston (2020)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris, F.: Hegel’s Development: Night Thoughts (Jena 1801–1806), 2nd edn. Clarendon, Oxford (1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Houlgate, S.: Schelling’s critique of Hegel’s science of logic. Rev. Metaphysics 53(1), 99–128 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lemanski, J.: Periods in the use of Euler-type diagrams. Acta Baltica 5(1), 50–60 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maybee, J.E.: Picturing Hegel: An Illustrated Guide to Hegel’s Encyclopaedia Logic. Lexington, Plymouth (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pluder, V.: The limits of the square: Hegel’s opposition to diagrams in its historical context. In: Vandoulakis, I., Béziau, J.-Y. (eds.) The Exoteric Square of Opposition. Birkhäuser, Cham (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentin Pluder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pluder, V., Lemanski, J. (2021). A Diagrammatic Representation of Hegel’s Science of Logic. In: Basu, A., Stapleton, G., Linker, S., Legg, C., Manalo, E., Viana, P. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12909. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86061-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86062-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics