Skip to main content

Active Learning and Case-Based Reasoning for the Deceptive Play in the Card Game of Truco

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems (BRACIS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13073))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Deception is an essential behavior in many card games. Despite this fact, it is not trivial to capture the intent of a human strategist when making deceptive decisions. That is even harder when dealing with deception in card games, where components of uncertainty, hidden information, luck and randomness introduce the need of case-based decision making. Approaching this problem along with the investigation of the game of Truco, a quite popular game in Southern regions of South America, this work presents an approach that combines active learning and Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) in which agents request a human specialist to review a reused game action retrieved from a case base containing played Truco hands. That happens when the agents are confronted with game situations that are identified as opportunities for deception. The goal is to actively capture problem-solving experiences in which deception can be used, and later employ such case knowledge in the enhancement of the deceptive capabilities of the Truco agents. Experimental results show that the use of the learned cases enabled different kinds of Truco agents to play more aggressively, being more deceptive and performing a larger number of successful bluffs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Buller, D.B., Burgoon, J.K.: Interpersonal deception theory. Commun. Theory 6, 203–242 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DePaulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., Cooper, H.: Cues to deception. Psychol. Bull. 129, 74–118 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ekman, P.: Telling lies: clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Billings, D., Davidson, A., Schaeffer, J., Szafron, D.: The challenge of poker. Artif. Intell. J. 134, 201–240 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mantaras, De., et al.: Retrieval, reuse, revision and retention in case-based reasoning. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 20, 215–240 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rubin, J., Watson, I.: Computer poker: a review. Artif. Intell. 175, 958–987 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Sandven, A., Tessem, B.: A case-based learner for Poker. In: The Ninth Scandinavian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SCAI 2006), Helsinki, Finland (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paulus, G.B., Assunção, J.V.C., Silva, L.A.L.: Cases and clusters in reuse policies for decision-making in card games. In: IEEE 31st International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 2019), Portland, OR, pp. 1361–1365 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paulus, G.B.: Cases and clusters for the development of decision-making reuse policies in card games (written in Portuguese). In: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Computação, vol. Master in Computer Science, p. 132. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moral, R.C.B., Paulus, G.B., Assunção, J.V.C., Silva, L.A.L.: Investigating case learning techniques for agents to play the card game of Truco. In: XIX Brazilian Symposium on Computer Games and Digital Entertainment (SBGames 2020), Recife, Brazil, pp. 107–116 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Winne, L.L.: Truco. Ediciones Godot, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Settles, B.: Active Learning Literature Survey. Department of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Madison (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richter, M.M.: Knowledge containers. In: Watson, I. (ed.) Readings in Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neto, H.C., Julia, R.M.S.: ACE-RL-Checkers: decision-making adaptability through integration of automatic case elicitation, reinforcement learning, and sequential pattern mining. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 57(3), 603–634 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-018-1175-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Floyd, M.W., Esfandiari, B.: Supplemental observation acquisition for learning by observation agents. Appl. Intell. 48(11), 4338–4354 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1191-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ontanon, S., Floyd, M.: A comparison of case acquisition strategies for learning from observations of state-based experts. In: The 26th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conf. (FLAIRS 2013), Florida, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ross, S., Bagnell, D.: Efficient reductions for imitation learning. In: Yee Whye, T., Mike, T. (eds.) The Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, vol. 9, pp. 661–668. PMLR (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ross, S., Gordon, G., Bagnell, J.A.: A reduction of imitation learning and structured prediction to no-regret online learning. In: The 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), Ft. Lauderdale, FL, pp. 627–635 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Packard, B., Ontanon, S.: Policies for active learning from demonstration. In: 2017 AAAI Spring Symposium Series. Stanford University (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Packard, B., Ontanon, S.: Learning behavior from limited demonstrations in the context of games. In: The 31st Int. Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conf. (FLAIRS 2018), Florida, USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miranda, M., Sánchez-Ruiz, A.A., Peinado, F.: Towards human-like bots using online interactive case-based reasoning. In: Bach, K., Marling, C. (eds.) ICCBR 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11680, pp. 314–328. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29249-2_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Floyd, M.W., Esfandiari, B.: An active approach to automatic case generation. In: McGinty, L., Wilson, D.C. (eds.) ICCBR 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5650, pp. 150–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02998-1_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Rubin, J., Watson, I.: Case-based strategies in computer Poker. AI Commun. 25, 19–48 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Sobrinho, M.G.: Manual do jogo do Truco Cego (Flor de Abóbora). Martins Livreiro Editora Ltda., Porto Alegre (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. ACPC: Annual Computer Poker Competition. http://www.computerpokercompetition.org/ (2018)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vargas, D.P., Paulus, G.B., Silva, L.A.L. (2021). Active Learning and Case-Based Reasoning for the Deceptive Play in the Card Game of Truco. In: Britto, A., Valdivia Delgado, K. (eds) Intelligent Systems. BRACIS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13073. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91702-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91702-9_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91701-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91702-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics