Skip to main content

End to End Autorship Email Verification Framework for a Secure Communication

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP 2020)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1545))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 487 Accesses

Abstract

The paper proposes an alternative email account protection to prevent a very specific targeting email attacks where an attacker can impersonate a legitimate/trusted sender to steal personal information to the recipient. Authorship mechanism based on the analysis of the author’s writing style and implemented through binary traditional and deep learning classifiers is applied to build the email verification mechanism. A flexible architecture, where the authorship component can be placed in different locations, is proposed. Due to its location and consequently to the email data available, can be exploited an individual writing style, or an end to end writing style learning related to the sender-receiver communication. The system is validated on two different dataset (i) the well-known public Enron dataset, with the experiments showing the author verification accuracy of 96.5% and 99% respectively for the individual and end to end writing style learning and (ii) our private dataset, with accuracy results of 98.3% and 97%. An alternative classification training, that exploits the partition of the dataset in subsets having approximately the same length, is presented. From the results obtained is proved how such training approach outperforms the traditional training where emails of different lengths are contained in the same training dataset. The overall results obtained proved that the authorship mechanism proposed is a promising alternative support technique exploitable as an email anti-scam or anti-theft tool to guarantee secure email communication.

This work has been partially supported by H2020 EU-funded projects SPARTA, GA 830892, C3ISP, GA 700294 and EIT-Digital Project HII, PRIN Governing Adaptive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://enrondata.readthedocs.io/en/latest/data/calo-enron-email-dataset/.

References

  1. Brocardo, M.L., Traore, I., Saad, S., Woungang, I.: Authorship verification for short messages using stylometry. In: 2013 International Conference on Computer, Information and Telecommunication Systems (CITS), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brocardo, M.L., Traore, I., Woungang, I.: Authorship verification of e-mail and tweet messages applied for continuous authentication. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 81(8), 1429–1440 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, X., Hao, P., Chandramouli, R., Subbalakshmi, K.P.: Authorship similarity detection from email messages. In: Perner, P. (ed.) MLDM 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6871, pp. 375–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23199-5_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Connor, J.T., Martin, R.D., Atlas, L.E.: Recurrent neural networks and robust time series prediction. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 5(2), 240–254 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dasarathy, B.V.: Nearest neighbor (NN) norms: NN pattern classification techniques. IEEE Computer Society Tutorial (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dewan, P., Kashyap, A., Kumaraguru, P.: Analyzing social and stylometric features to identify spear phishing emails. In: 2014 APWG Symposium on Electronic Crime Research (ecrime), pp. 1–13. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Donahue, J., et al.: Long-term recurrent convolutional networks for visual recognition and description. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2625–2634 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Freund, Y., Schapire, R., Abe, N.: A short introduction to boosting. J. Japanese Soc. Artif. Intell. 14(771–780), 1612 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Giorgi, G., Saracino, A., Martinelli, F.: Email spoofing attack detection through an end to end authorship attribution system. In: Furnell, S., Mori, P., Weippl, E.R., Camp, O. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy, ICISSP 2020, Valletta, Malta, February 25–27, 2020. pp. 64–74. SCITEPRESS (2020). https://doi.org/10.5220/0008954600640074

  10. Graves, A., Mohamed, A.r., Hinton, G.: Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 6645–6649. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guenther, M.: Social engineering-security awareness series. Information Warfare site UK online. http://www.iwar.org.uk/comsec/resources/sa-tools/social-engineering.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2006

  12. Hamid, I.R.A., Abawajy, J., Kim, T.: Using feature selection and classification scheme for automating phishing email detection. Stud. Inf. Contr. 22(1), 61–70 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Han, Y., Shen, Y.: Accurate spear phishing campaign attribution and early detection. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 2079–2086 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ho, T.K.: Random decision forests. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 278–282. IEEE (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jakobsson, M.: Modeling and preventing phishing attacks. In: Financial Cryptography, vol. 5 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kiefer, J., Wolfowitz, J., et al.: Stochastic estimation of the maximum of a regression function. Ann. Math. Stat. 23(3), 462–466 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Klimt, B., Yang, Y.: The enron corpus: a new dataset for email classification research. In: Boulicaut, J.-F., Esposito, F., Giannotti, F., Pedreschi, D. (eds.) ECML 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3201, pp. 217–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30115-8_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Litvak, M.: Deep dive into authorship verification of email messages with convolutional neural network. In: Lossio-Ventura, J.A., Muñante, D., Alatrista-Salas, H. (eds.) SIMBig 2018. CCIS, vol. 898, pp. 129–136. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11680-4_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 (2013)

  20. Peng, C.Y.J., Lee, K.L., Ingersoll, G.M.: An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. J. Educ. Res. 96(1), 3–14 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1(1), 81–106 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ruder, S., Ghaffari, P., Breslin, J.G.: Character-level and multi-channel convolutional neural networks for large-scale authorship attribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.06686 (2016)

  23. Sanderson, C., Guenter, S.: Short text authorship attribution via sequence kernels, markov chains and author unmasking: An investigation. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 482–491. Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schuster, M., Paliwal, K.K.: Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans. Sig. Process. 45(11), 2673–2681 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shrestha, P., Sierra, S., Gonzalez, F., Montes, M., Rosso, P., Solorio, T.: Convolutional neural networks for authorship attribution of short texts. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 2, pp. 669–674 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Suykens, J.A., Vandewalle, J.: Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process. Lett. 9(3), 293–300 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, X., Zhao, J., LeCun, Y.: Character-level convolutional networks for text classification. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 649–657 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zheng, R., Li, J., Chen, H., Huang, Z.: A framework for authorship identification of online messages: writing-style features and classification techniques. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57(3), 378–393 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giacomo Giorgi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Giorgi, G., Saracino, A., Martinelli, F. (2022). End to End Autorship Email Verification Framework for a Secure Communication. In: Furnell, S., Mori, P., Weippl, E., Camp, O. (eds) Information Systems Security and Privacy. ICISSP 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1545. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94900-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94900-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94899-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94900-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics