Abstract
When users unknowingly interact with false information online, they may be susceptible to the influence of misinformation. Using a fact-checker to analyze whether the information presented is accurate or misleading can help users identify false information. The present study examined two different methods: use of a correction or warning, presented by a fact-checker, to identify which is more effective in reducing misinformation. One hundred and twenty-four participants were recruited from MTurk and Introductory Psychology courses to participate in the study. Participants were asked to read short stories, followed by statements that are related to the short stories (e.g., media posts about the short stories) that were or were not verified by a fact-checker. Then, participants were asked to answer questions related to the original short story to measure their memory of the information as well as the number of references to the misinformation. At the end of the study, participants were asked to rate their level of trust in online information sources and the fact-checker used in the present study, which always provided accurate information. Results showed that participants used a fact-checker about 70% of the time when one was made available to them. Having a choice to use a fact-checker increased participants’ accuracy scores on a memory check test, and the presence of a fact-checker reduced the number of references to misinformation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M., Yu, C.: Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Res. Polit. 6(2), 1–8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019848554
Bailey, N.A., Olaguez, A.P., Klemfuss, J.Z., Loftus, E.F.: Tactics for increasing resistance to misinformation. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 35, 863–872 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3812
Brandtzaeg, P.B., Følstad, A.: Trust and distrust in online fact-checking services. Commun. ACM 60(9), 65–71 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3122803
Crozier, W.E., Strange, D.: Correcting the misinformation effect. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 33, 585–595 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3499
Diep, T.T.: The Role of Sharing in Remembering Social Media News (Order No. 22583183). Available from Dissertations & Theses @ California State University, Long Beach; Publicly Available Content Database (2311654536) (2019). http://csulb.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/role-sharing-remembering-social-media-news/docview/2311654536/se-2
Ecker, U.K., Lewandowsky, S., Tang, D.T.: Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Mem. Cognit. 38(8), 1087–1100 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.38.8.1087
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U.K., Seifert, C.M., Schwarz, N., Cook, J.: Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 13(3), 106–131 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
Nakov, P., et al.: Automated fact-checking for assisting human fact-checkers. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2021). https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/619
Nekmat, E.: Nudge effect of fact-check alerts: source influence and media skepticism on sharing of news misinformation in social media. Soc. Media + Soc. 6(1), 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119897322
Pennycook, G., Rand, D.G.: The psychology of fake news. Trends Cogn. Sci. 25(5), 388–402 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Collins, E.T., Rand, D.G.: The implied truth effect: attaching warnings to a subset of fake news headlines increases perceived accuracy of headlines without warnings. Manage. Sci. 66(11), 4944–4957 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478
Vraga, E.K., Kim, S.C., Cook, J., Bode, L.: Testing the effectiveness of correction placement and type on Instagram. Int. J. Press/Polit. 25(4), 632–652 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220919082
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Su, C., Diep, T., Vu, KP.L. (2022). Which Method of Fact-Checking is Beneficial in Fighting Misinformation?. In: Yamamoto, S., Mori, H. (eds) Human Interface and the Management of Information: Visual and Information Design. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13305. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06424-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06424-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06423-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06424-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)