Abstract
The aim of our study is to enrich the current understanding of teachers’ collective professional learning and development by introducing a method called the Change Laboratory (CL), which is a participatory work development method based on theory of expansive learning. We present and empirically illustrate how the method was employed among a group of 12 teachers and a principal for facilitating transformative agency, and how it contributed to their collective professional learning and the development of new practices in the school. Our interactional video data consists of six CL meetings and a follow-up meeting held in an elementary school which operates as one of the pioneering university-level teacher training, research and development units in Finland. The CL provided the participants with research-assisted space and tools to collectively analyse and redesign their work activities. In a dialectical learning process, the CL first triggered the surfacing of problems and tensions in the school community, then supporting the conceptualisation of problems as stemming from systemic organisational contradictions, and eventually leading to the creation of novel solutions to resolve the contradictions and transform the school’s practices. Our analysis illustrates the significance of transformative agency for turning organisational contradictions as drivers for collective professional learning and development, in a bottom-up process of organisational renewal. Our findings also demonstrate the demands that such a collective process of professional learning poses for teachers, requiring continuous efforts and cultural change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Admiraal, W., Schenke, W., De Jong, L., Emmelot, Y., & Sligte, H. (2021). Schools as professional learning communities: What can schools do to support professional development of their teachers? Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 684–698.
Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 1–21.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
Brevik, L. M., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., Lund, A., & Strømme, T. A. (2019). Transformative agency in teacher education: Fostering professional digital competence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102875.
Brodie, K. (2021). Teacher agency in professional learning communities. Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 560–573.
Cordingley, P. (2015). The contribution of research to teachers’ professional learning and development. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 234–252.
Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Engeström, Y. (2007). From stabilization knowledge to possibility knowledge in organizational learning. Management Learning, 38(3), 271–275.
Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2009). From learning environments and implementation to activity systems and expansive learning. Actio: An international journal of human activity theory, 2, 17–33.
Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598–628.
Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368–387.
Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The Change Laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10–17.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity-theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century. Blackwell.
Engeström, Y., Kerosuo, H., & Kajamaa, A. (2007). Beyond discontinuity: Expansive organizational learning remembered. Management Learning, 38(3), 319–336.
Engeström, Y., Kajamaa, A., Lahtinen, P., & Sannino, A. (2015). Toward a grammar of collaboration. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 22(2), 92–111.
Finnish National Agency for Education. (2014). National core curriculum for basic education.
Goller, M., & Paloniemi, S. (2017). Agency at work and its relationship to learning and professional development: An introduction. In M. Göller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 1–14). Springer.
Grant, C. (2020). Double stimulation and transformative agency for leadership development of school learners in Southern Africa. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 30(1), 53–70.
Haapasaari, A., Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2016). The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a change laboratory intervention. Journal of Education and Work, 29(2), 232–262.
Hyrkkö, S., & Kajamaa, A. (2021). Distributed creativity and expansive learning in a teacher training school’s Change Laboratory. In S. Lemmetty, V. Glaveanu, K. Collin, & P. Forsman (Eds.), Creativity and learning: Context, processes and impact. Springer.
Il’enkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays in its history and theory. Progress.
Junor Clarke, P. A., & Fournillier, J. B. (2012). Action research, pedagogy, and activity theory: Tools facilitating two instructors’ interpretations of the professional development of four preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 649–660.
Kajamaa, A. (2011). Unraveling the helix of change: An activity-theoretical study of health care change efforts and their consequences. University of Helsinki.
Kajamaa, A., & Kumpulainen, K. (2019). Agency in the Making: Analyzing students’ transformative agency in a school-based makerspace. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(3), 266–281.
Kerosuo, H., Kajamaa, A., & Engeström, Y. (2010). Promoting innovation and learning through Change Laboratory: An example from Finnish health care. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 4(1), 110–130.
Kumpulainen, K., Kajamaa, A., & Rajala, A. (2018). Understanding educational change: Agency-structure dynamics in a novel design and making environment. Digital Education Review, 33, 26–38.
Lattuca, L. R. (2002). Learning interdisciplinarity. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 711–739.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Prentice-Hall.
Lund, A., & Vestøl, J. M. (2020). An analytical unit of transformative agency: Dynamics and dialectics. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 25, 100390.
Miettinen, R. (2013). Innovation, human capabilities, and democracy: Towards an enabling welfare state. Oxford University Press.
Morselli, D., & Sannino, A. (2021). Testing the model of double stimulation in a Change Laboratory. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103224.
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407.
Rainio, A., & Hofmann, R. (2021). Teacher professional dialogues during a school intervention: From stabilization to possibility discourse through reflexive noticing. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(4–5), 707–746.
Sannino, A. (2008). From talk to action: Experiencing interlocution in developmental interventions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15, 234–257.
Sannino, A. (2015). The principle of double stimulation: A path to volitional action. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 1–15.
Sannino, A., Engeström, Y., & Lemos, M. (2016). Formative interventions for expansive learning and transformative agency. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 599–633.
Van Meeuwen, P., Huijboom, F., Rusman, E., Vermeulen, M., & Imants, J. (2020). Towards a comprehensive and dynamic conceptual framework to research and enact professional learning communities in the context of secondary education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 405–427.
Virkkunen, J. (2006). Dilemmas in building shared transformative agency. Activités, 3(1), 43–66.
Virkkunen, J., & Newnham, D. S. (2013). The Change Laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education. Sense Publishers.
Virkkunen, J., & Tenhunen, E. (2010). Finding a concept that integrates specialists’ know-how – The case of a special school for handicapped and neurologically ill children. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 3, 1–24.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The psychology of higher mental functions. Harvard University Press.
Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.
Winch, C., Oancea, A., & Orchard, J. (2015). The contribution of educational research to teachers’ professional learning: Philosophical understandings. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 202–216.
Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Strategic facilitation of problem-based discussion for teacher professional development. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 342–394.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kajamaa, A., Hyrkkö, S. (2022). Change Laboratory Method for Facilitating Transformative Agency and Collective Professional Learning – Case from a Finnish Elementary School. In: Goller, M., Kyndt, E., Paloniemi, S., Damşa, C. (eds) Methods for Researching Professional Learning and Development. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08517-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08518-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)