Skip to main content

SEGP: Stance-Emotion Joint Data Augmentation with Gradual Prompt-Tuning for Stance Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science – ICCS 2022 (ICCS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13352))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1409 Accesses

Abstract

Stance detection is an important task in opinion mining, which aims to determine whether the author of a text is in favor of, against, or neutral towards a specific target. By now, the scarcity of annotations is one of the remaining problems in stance detection. In this paper, we propose a Stance-Emotion joint Data Augmentation with Gradual Prompt-tuning (SEGP) model to address this problem. In order to generate more training samples, we propose an auxiliary sentence based Stance-Emotion joint Data Augmentation (SEDA) method, formulate data augmentation as a conditional masked language modeling task. We leverage different relations between stance and emotion to construct auxiliary sentences. SEDA generates augmented samples by predicting the masked words conditioned on both their context and auxiliary sentences. Furthermore, we propose a Gradual Prompt-tuning method to make better use of the augmented samples, which is a combination of prompt-tuning and curriculum learning. Specifically, the model starts by training on only original samples, then adds augmented samples as training progresses. Experimental results show that SEGP significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. AlDayel, A., Magdy, W.: Stance detection on social media: state of the art and trends. Inf. Process. Manage. 58(4), 102597 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allaway, E., McKeown, K.: Zero-shot stance detection: a dataset and model using generalized topic representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03640 (2020)

  3. Augenstein, I., Rocktäschel, T., Vlachos, A., Bontcheva, K.: Stance detection with bidirectional conditional encoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05464 (2016)

  4. Bengio, Y., Louradour, J., Collobert, R., Weston, J.: Curriculum learning. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 41–48 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, T.B., et al.: Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165 (2020)

  6. Chauhan, D.S., Kumar, R., Ekbal, A.: Attention based shared representation for multi-task stance detection and sentiment analysis. In: Gedeon, T., Wong, K.W., Lee, M. (eds.) ICONIP 2019. CCIS, vol. 1143, pp. 661–669. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36802-9_70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Du, J., Xu, R., He, Y., Gui, L.: Stance classification with target-specific neural attention networks. In: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garg, S., Ramakrishnan, G.: Bae: Bert-based adversarial examples for text classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.01970 (2020)

  9. Glandt, K., Khanal, S., Li, Y., Caragea, D., Caragea, C.: Stance detection in covid-19 tweets. In: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, vol. 1 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jiao, X., et al.: Tinybert: distilling bert for natural language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.10351 (2019)

  11. Kenton, J.D.M.W.C., Toutanova, L.K.: Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pp. 4171–4186 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Korbar, B., Tran, D., Torresani, L.: Cooperative learning of audio and video models from self-supervised synchronization. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Küçük, D., Can, F.: Stance detection: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 53(1), 1–37 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, Y., Caragea, C.: Multi-task stance detection with sentiment and stance lexicons. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp. 6299–6305 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, Y., Caragea, C.: A multi-task learning framework for multi-target stance detection. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021, pp. 2320–2326 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, Y., Caragea, C.: Target-aware data augmentation for stance detection. In: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 1850–1860 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, Y., Cohn, T., Baldwin, T.: Robust training under linguistic adversity. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers, pp. 21–27 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., Neubig, G.: Pre-train, prompt, and predict: a systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13586 (2021)

  19. Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohammad, S.M., Sobhani, P., Kiritchenko, S.: Stance and sentiment in tweets. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 17(3), 1–23 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mueller, J., Thyagarajan, A.: Siamese recurrent architectures for learning sentence similarity. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 30 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Müller, M., Salathé, M., Kummervold, P.E.: Covid-twitter-bert: a natural language processing model to analyse covid-19 content on twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07503 (2020)

  23. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reynolds, L., McDonell, K.: Prompt programming for large language models: Beyond the few-shot paradigm. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–7 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schuster, M., Paliwal, K.K.: Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 45(11), 2673–2681 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sobhani, P., Inkpen, D., Zhu, X.: A dataset for multi-target stance detection. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers, pp. 551–557 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Somasundaran, S., Wiebe, J.: Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, pp. 116–124 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tsvetkov, Y., Faruqui, M., Ling, W., MacWhinney, B., Dyer, C.: Learning the curriculum with bayesian optimization for task-specific word representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.03852 (2016)

  29. Walker, M., Anand, P., Abbott, R., Grant, R.: Stance classification using dialogic properties of persuasion. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 592–596 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, W.Y., Yang, D.: That’s so annoying!!!: a lexical and frame-semantic embedding based data augmentation approach to automatic categorization of annoying behaviors using# petpeeve tweets. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2557–2563 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, X., Pham, H., Dai, Z., Neubig, G.: Switchout: an efficient data augmentation algorithm for neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.07512 (2018)

  32. Wei, J., Huang, C., Vosoughi, S., Cheng, Y., Xu, S.: Few-shot text classification with triplet networks, data augmentation, and curriculum learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.07552 (2021)

  33. Wei, J., Zou, K.: Eda: easy data augmentation techniques for boosting performance on text classification tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.11196 (2019)

  34. Weinshall, D., Cohen, G., Amir, D.: Curriculum learning by transfer learning: Theory and experiments with deep networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 5238–5246. PMLR (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wu, X., Lv, S., Zang, L., Han, J., Hu, S.: Conditional bert contextual augmentation. In: International Conference on Computational Science, pp. 84–95. Springer (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, B., Yang, M., Li, X., Ye, Y., Xu, X., Dai, K.: Enhancing cross-target stance detection with transferable semantic-emotion knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 3188–3197 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, X., Zhao, J., LeCun, Y.: Character-level convolutional networks for text classification. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 28, 649–657 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Zhou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, J., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Hu, S. (2022). SEGP: Stance-Emotion Joint Data Augmentation with Gradual Prompt-Tuning for Stance Detection. In: Groen, D., de Mulatier, C., Paszynski, M., Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., Dongarra, J.J., Sloot, P.M.A. (eds) Computational Science – ICCS 2022. ICCS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13352. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08757-8_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08757-8_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08756-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08757-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics