Abstract
This chapter considers the ways that John Logan, as a queer author, reappropriates the abject and the liminal in Penny Dreadful (2014–2016) as signifiers of what I call the queer sublime—an almost hallowed state of difference—something Logan conceives of as desirable but inherently misunderstood, often by the very characters who embody it most. Through a “veiling” that conceals the monstrousness/queerness of his characters, either from themselves or from heteronormative Victorian society at large, Logan explores the taboo and fluid sexualities often unloosed in Gothic narratives. The figurative image of the veil (in its Sedgwickian sense, “suffused with sexuality”) functions in Penny Dreadful as both a repressive and emancipatory device, frequently evoked via literal transformations into “other(ed) selves” (demon-possessed Vanessa; lycanthropic Ethan). In Logan’s queer cosmology, these figures of abjection who occupy its dark terrain are therefore impossibly aware of the flesh and its intrinsic mutability—the body as simultaneously both inviolate object and corrupted vessel. To this end, Penny Dreadful finds itself in productive intertextual dialogue with James Whale’s Frankenstein (1931) and its sequel Bride of Frankenstein (1935). Just as Whale imbues Frankenstein’s monster and his bride with a corporeal strangeness, Logan foregrounds the body as a site of queer potentiality, collapsing distinctions between the sacred and the profane through destabilizing acts of self-creation. Yet this does not amount to a reductive analogy of simply reading the monstrous as queer. Traditional avatars of monstrosity, such as Lucifer and Dracula, emerge as forces of compulsory heteronormativity in Penny Dreadful. In opposition to these, Logan, like fellow queer author Whale, seeks to define a liminal space (the queer sublime) where his “beautiful monsters” may reside in all their tragic glory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Works Cited
Auerbach, Nina. Woman and the Demon: The Life of a Victorian Myth. Harvard UP, 1984.
Benshoff, Harry M. Monsters in the Closet: Homosexuality and the Horror Film. Manchester UP, 1997.
Bersani, Leo. Is the Rectum a Grave?: And Other Essays. U Chicago P, 2009.
Bronfen, Elisabeth. Over Her Dead Body: Death, Femininity and the Aesthetic. Manchester UP, 1992.
Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. “Monster Culture (Seven Theses).” Monster Theory: Reading Culture, edited by Jeffrey Jerome Cohen, U of Minnesota P, 1996, pp. 3–25.
Curtis, James. James Whale. Scarecrow P, 1982.
Denson, Shane. Postnaturalism: Frankenstein, Film, and the Anthropotechnical Interface. Columbia UP, 2014.
Edelman, Lee. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Duke UP, 2004.
Friedman, Lester D., and Allison Kavey. Monstrous Progeny: A History of the Frankenstein Narratives. Amsterdam UP, 2016.
Gosling, Sharon. The Art and Making of Penny Dreadful. Titan Books, 2015.
Haggerty, George. Queer Gothic. U of Illinois P, 2006.
Halberstam, Jack. Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters. Duke UP, 1995.
Hurley, Kelly. The Gothic Body: Sexuality, Materialism, and Degeneration at the Fin de Siècle. Cambridge UP, 2004.
Johnson, Barbara. “My Monster/My Self.” Diacritics, vol. 12, no. 2, 1982, pp. 2–10.
Kahane, Claire. “The Gothic Mirror.” The (M)Other Tongue Essays in Feminist Psychoanalytic Interpretation, edited by Shirley Nelson Garner et al., Cornell UP, 1985, pp. 334–51.
Kulish, Nancy, and Deanna Holtzman. A Story of Her Own: The Female Oedipus Complex Reexamined and Renamed. Jason Aronson, 2008.
Levitz, Tamara. Modernist Mysteries: Persephone. Oxford U Press, 2012.
Manguel, Alberto. Bride of Frankenstein. BFI, 1997.
Masse, Michelle. In the Name of Love: Women, Masochism, and the Gothic. 2nd ed., Cornell UP, 1992.
Miller, Stuart. “‘We Feel a Kinship With the Creature.’” The New York Times, 26 Oct. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/theater/frankenstein-mel-brooks-kenneth-branagh.html.
Mishra, Vijay. The Gothic Sublime. State U of New York P, 1994.
Moses, Toby. “Penny Dreadful Writer John Logan on Cultural Appropriation: ‘Writers Have to Dream Freely.’” The Guardian, 22 June 2020, www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2020/jun/18/john-logan-penny-dreadful-gladiator-writers-dream-freely.
O’Malley, Patrick. Catholicism, Sexual Deviance, and Victorian Gothic Culture. Cambridge UP, 2006.
Primorac, Antonija. Neo-Victorianism on Screen: Postfeminism and Contemporary Adaptations of Victorian Women. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. 2nd ed., Columbia UP, 2016.
———. Epistemology of the Closet. 2nd ed., U of California P, 2008.
———. The Coherence of Gothic Conventions. Methuen, 1986.
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Nick Groom. Frankenstein: Or ‘The Modern Prometheus’: The 1818 Text (Oxford World’s Classics). 3rd ed., Oxford UP, 2020.
Smith, Angela. Hideous Progeny: Disability, Eugenics, and Classic Horror Cinema. Columbia UP, 2012.
Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll. “The Female World of Love and Ritual: Relations between Women in Nineteenth-Century America.” Signs, vol. 1, no. 1, 1975, pp. 1–29,.
Thomas, June. “‘The Thing That Made Me Monstrous to Some People Is Also the Thing That Empowered Me.’” Slate, 9 May 2014, slate.com/human-interest/2014/05/penny-dreadfuls-john-logan-why-a-gay-writer-feels-a-kinship-with-frankensteins-creature.html.
Watson, Eleri Anona. “‘We Were a Nothingness Shot with Gleams of What Might Be. But No More’: Katherine Mansfield, Virginia Woolf and the Queer Sublime.” Katherine Mansfield and Bliss and Other Stories, edited by Enda Duffy et al., Edinburgh UP, 2020, pp. 74–90.
Weiskel, Thomas. The Romantic Sublime: Studies in the Structure of Psychology and Transcendence. Johns Hopkins UP, 1976.
Whale, James, director. Frankenstein. Universal, 1931.
Whale, James, director. Bride of Frankenstein. Universal, 1935.
Young, Elizabeth. “Here Comes the Bride: Wedding Gender and Race in Bride of Frankenstein.” Feminist Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, 1991, pp. 403–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bogdanski, J. (2023). “All Those Sacred Midnight Things”: Queer Authorship, Veiled Desire, and Divine Transgression in Penny Dreadful. In: Grossman, J., Scheibel, W. (eds) Penny Dreadful and Adaptation. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12180-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12180-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12179-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-12180-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)