Skip to main content

Mobile Telepresence Robots in Education: Strengths, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Challenges

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Educating for a New Future: Making Sense of Technology-Enhanced Learning Adoption (EC-TEL 2022)

Abstract

A mobile telepresence robot (MTR) is a semi-autonomous robot whose movement and interaction with its surrounding environment is controlled by a person from a distance. In education, MTR enable learners or educators to virtually participate in a class from a distance. TRinE: Telepresence Robots in Education is an EU project that aims at providing an interactive toolkit to support educators, learners, and others in order to integrate MTR in education. During January and February 2022, project’s partners conducted a qualitative study to collect the experiences and views of educators, learners, and other stakeholders (i.e., administrators, technical support staff, librarians) regarding the use of MTR in education across Austria, Germany, Greece, France, Iceland, Malta, and USA. A total of 19 persons were interviewed and 66 persons participated in 12 focus groups discussions. The findings describe interviewees’ experiences with MTR in education as well as the views of interviewees and focus groups’ participants with regard to pros, cons, and recommendations of using MTR in education. These findings may help educational policy makers, educational institutes officials, educators, and others to efficiently integrate MTR in education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kristoffersson, A., Coradeschi, S., Loutfi, A.: A review of mobile robotic telepresence. Adv. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/902316

  2. Schouten, A.P., Portegies, T.C., Withuis, I., Willemsen, L.M., Mazerant-Dubois, K.: Robomorphism: examining the effects of telepresence robots on between-student cooperation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 126 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106980

  3. Wernbacher, T., et al.: TRinE: telepresence robots in education. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED), pp. 6514–6522. IATED (2021). https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2022.1653

  4. Edwards, A., Edwards, C., Spence, P.R., Harris, C., Gambino, A.: Robots in the classroom: differences in students’ perceptions of credibility and learning between “teacher as robot” and “robot as teacher.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 65, 627–634 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lim, M.S., Han, J.H.: Convergence technologies by a long-term case study on telepresence robot-assisted learning. J. Convergence Inf. Technol. 9(7), 106–113 (2019). https://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201921467621155.page

  6. Puarungroj, W., Boonsirisumpun, N.: Multiple device controlled design for implementing telepresence robot in schools. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Li, R., Phusavat, K., Paoprasert, N., Kwok, L.-F. (eds.) ICBL 2020. LNCS, vol. 12218, pp. 405–415. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51968-1_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Cha, E., Chen, S., Mataric, M.J.: Designing telepresence robots for K-12 education. In: 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 683–688. IEEE (2017). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8172377

  8. Shin, K.W.C., Han, J.H.: Qualitative exploration on children’s interactions in telepresence robot assisted language learning. J. Korea Convergence Soc. 8(3), 177–184 (2017). https://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201713842135266.page

  9. Fischer, A.J., Bloomfield, B.S., Clark, R.R., McClelland, A.L., Erchul, W.P.: Increasing student compliance with teacher instructions using telepresence robot problem-solving teleconsultation. Int. J. Sch. Educ. Psychol. 7(sup1), 158–172 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2018.1470948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burbank, M.D., Goldsmith, M.M., Bates, A.J., Spikner, J., Park, K.: Teacher observations using telepresence robots: benefits and challenges for strengthening evaluations. J. Educ. Supervision 4(1) (2021). https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.4.1.6

  11. Ahumeda-Newhart, V.A., Warschauer, M., Sender, L.: Virtual inclusion via telepresence robots in the classroom: an exploratory case study. Int. J. Technol. Learn. 23(4), 9–25 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahumada-Newhart, V., Olson, J.S.: My student is a robot: how schools manage telepresence experiences for students. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 342–347. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ahumada-Newhart, V., Olson, J.S.: Going to school on a robot: robot and user interface design features that matter. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 26(4), 1–28 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3325210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gallon, L., Abénia, A., Dubergey, F., Negui, M.: Using a telepresence robot in an educational context. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS), pp. 16–22 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Page, A., Charteris, J., Berman, J.: Telepresence robot use for children with chronic illness in Australian schools: a scoping review and thematic analysis. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 13(6), 1281–1293 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00714-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Soares, N., Kay, J.C., Craven, G.: Mobile robotic telepresence solutions for the education of hospitalized children. Perspect. Health Inf. Manag. 14 (2017). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc5653953/

  17. Liao, J., Lu, X.: Exploring the affordances of telepresence robots in foreign language learning. Lang. Learn. Technol. 22(3), 20–32 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liao, J., Lu, X., Masters, K.A., Dudek, J., Zhou, Z.: Telepresence-place-based foreign language learning and its design principles. Comput. Assisted Lang. Learn. 1–26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1690527

  19. Liao, J., Dudek, J.: Task design in telepresence-place-based foreign language learning. In: Gresalfi, M., Horn, I.S. (eds.) The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, vol. 3, pp. 1807–1808. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Nashville (2020). https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2020.1807

  20. Kwon, O.H., Koo, S.Y., Kim, Y.G., Kwon, D.S.: Telepresence robot system for English tutoring. In: 2010 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, pp. 152–155. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tanaka, F., Takahashi, T., Matsuzoe, S., Tazawa, N., Morita, M.: Child-operated telepresence robot: a field trial connecting classrooms between Australia and Japan. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 5896–5901. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Perifanou, M., Häfner, P., Economides, A.: Users’ experiences and perceptions about telepresence robots in education. In: Proceedings EDULEARN, 14th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 4–6 July. IATED (2022). https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2022.2379

  23. Perifanou, M., Galea, M., Economides, A.A., Wernbacher, T., Häfner, P.: A focus group study on telepresence robots in education. In: Proceedings EDULEARN, 14th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 4–6 July. IATED (2022). https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2022.2397

Download references

Acknowledgments

This publication was partially supported by Erasmus+ project “TRinE: Telepresence Robots in Education”. Project Reference: 2020-1-MT01-KA227-SCH-092408. This publication reflects the views only of the authors. The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Perifanou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Perifanou, M., Economides, A.A., Häfner, P., Wernbacher, T. (2022). Mobile Telepresence Robots in Education: Strengths, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Challenges. In: Hilliger, I., Muñoz-Merino, P.J., De Laet, T., Ortega-Arranz, A., Farrell, T. (eds) Educating for a New Future: Making Sense of Technology-Enhanced Learning Adoption. EC-TEL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16289-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16290-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics