Skip to main content

Learning Analytics to Foster Quality Culture in Education and Training Organizations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Justice, Media and Technology in Teacher Education (ATEE 2021)

Abstract

Learning analytics have shown great potential in improving teaching quality, learning experience and administrative efficiency, although several major challenges remain and lie in the intrinsic tensions between innovation and functioning (Tsai Y-S. et al., 2019). The research hypothesis starts from the possibility of exploit LAs into the Quality Assurance (QA) framework and considering the quality assessment devices as a reference for collecting and organizing the data. QA devices can be used to “read” the complexity, define “simplified” processes and arrive at the identification and understanding of the system components, the relationships between them, and their functioning and their effectiveness, also thanks to indicators for measurement of results. On the basis of these reflections, a practice-driven research experience has been implemented within the master course “New digital skills: Open Education, Social and Mobile Learning” of the University of Florence, with the aim of producing new insights and exploring opportunities to exploit LAs into the practice of QA, starting from training of teachers and educators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Taylor, A., Hill, F.: Quality Management in Education. Qual. Assur. Educ. 1(1), 21–28 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsai, Y.-S., Gašević, D.: The State of Learning Analytics in Europe – Executive Summary – SHEILA (2017). http://sheilaproject.eu/2017/04/18/the- state-of-learning-analytics-in-europeexecutive- summary/

  3. Rogers, E.M.: The Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salih, T.: Total quality management in education. Zanco J. 36 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brookfield, S.D.: Self-Directed Learning. In: Maclean, R., Wilson, D. (eds.) (a cura di), International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work, pp. 2615–2627. Springer, Dordrecht (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Larson, J., Jordan, S.S., Lande, M., e Weiner, S.: Supporting self-directed learning in a project-based embedded systems design course. IEEE Trans. Educ. 63(2), 88–97 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ehlers, U.D.: Understanding quality culture. Qual. Assur. Educ. 17(4), 343–363 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Candy, L.: Practice Based Research: A Guide. University of Technology, Sydney (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Skains, L.: Creative practice as research: discourse on methodology. J. Media Pract. 19(1), 82–97 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vanhoof, J., Van Petegem, P.: Matching internal and external evaluation in an era of accountability and school development: lessons from a Flemish perspective. Stud. Educ. Eval. 33, 101–119 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. OECD: Reviews of evaluation and assessment in education, OECD, New Zealand (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Levina, E.Y., Kamasheva, Y.L., et al.: A process approach to management of an educational organization. Rev. Eur. Stud. 7(4), 234–240 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hattie, J.: Horizons and whirlpools: the well-travelled road of national standards, cognition institute (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pellegrini, M., Vivanet, G.: Evidence-based policies in education: initiatives and challenges in Europe. ECNU Rev. Educ. 4(1), 209653112092467 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shum, S.B.: Learning analytics. policy brief. UNESCO Inst. Inform. Technol. Educ. 12 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ferguson, R., et al.: Research evidence on the use of learning analytics - implications for education policy. In: Vuorikari, R., Castaño Muñoz, J. (eds.). Joint Research Centre Science for Policy Report (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. de Waal, P.: Learning analytics for continuous learning-processes improvement through dynamic data-informed decisions. Formazione Insegnamento, X V/2, 43–51 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Becker, B.: Learning analytics: insights into the natural learning behaviour of our students. Behav. Soc. Sci. Libr. 32(1), 63–67 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Stoyanov, S., Specht, M.: Quality indicators for learning analytics. Educ. Technol. Soc. 17(4), 117–132 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Endsley, M. R., Garland D. J (Eds.): Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum associates, Mahwah, NJ (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weick, K.E.: Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Whalen, T.: Factors affecting quality culture. Qual. Manag. J. 11(4), 43–55 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kairiša, I., Lapiņa, I.: Analysis of factors influencing quality culture and their impact on organizational development. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, vol. VI (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Del Gobbo, G., Valutazione di sistema e cultura della qualità: itinerari di ricerca e formazione per le università. Nuova Secondaria, vol. XXXVIII, pp. 99–110 (2021). ISSN: 1828–4582

    Google Scholar 

  25. APEC: quality assurance of online learning. University of Melbourne: Melbourne centre for the study of higher education (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reed Scull, W., Kendrick, D., Shearer, R., Offerman, D.: The landscape of quality assurance in distance education. Continuing High. Educ. Rev. 75, 138–149 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. European commission: learning analytics (Key messages) (2016). https://ec.europa.eu/education/sites/education/files/2016-pla-learning-analytics_en.pdf

  28. Tsai, Y.S., Moreno-Marcos, P.M., Tammets, K., Kollom, K., Gašević, D.: SHEILA policy framework: informing institutional strategies and policy processes of learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 320–329 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tsai, Y.-S., Poquet, O., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A.: Complexity leadership in learning analytics: drivers, challenges and opportunities. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 6, 2839–2854 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. European institute of public administration: improving public organisations through self-assessment. CAF 2013 (2013). http://qualitapa.gov.it/sitoarcheologico/fileadmin/mirror/crcaf/documenti/CAF_2013.pdf

  31. European foundation for quality management. business excellence model (2006). www.efqm.org

  32. European foundation for quality management: assessing for excellence. European foundation for quality management, Brussels (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. European institute of public administration: improving public organisations through self-assessment. CAF 2020 (2019). https://www.eupan.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/20191118-CAF-2020-FINAL.pdf

  34. Mukhopadhyay, M.: Total quality management in education. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sullivan, G.: Making Space: The purpose and place of practice-led research. In: Smith, H., Roger, T., Dean. Practice-Led Research, Research-Led Practice in the Creative Arts, pp. 41–65. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Gašević, D., Tejeiro, R.: What do students want? Towards an instrument for students’ evaluation of quality of learning analytics services. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, pp. 368–372 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanna Del Gobbo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Del Gobbo, G., Galeotti, G. (2022). Learning Analytics to Foster Quality Culture in Education and Training Organizations. In: Ranieri, M., Pellegrini, M., Menichetti, L., Roffi, A., Luzzi, D. (eds) Social Justice, Media and Technology in Teacher Education. ATEE 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1649. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20777-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20777-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20776-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20777-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics