Skip to main content

Categorical-Continuous Bayesian Optimization Applied to Chemical Reactions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Optimization and Learning (OLA 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1684))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 373 Accesses

Abstract

Chemical reaction optimization is a challenging task for the industry. Its purpose is to experimentally find reaction parameters (e.g. temperature, concentration, pressure) that maximize or minimize a set of objectives (e.g. yield or selectivity of the chemical reaction). These experiments are often expensive and long (up to several days), making the use of modern optimization methods more and more attractive for chemistry scientists.

Recently, Bayesian optimization has been shown to outperform human decision-making for the optimization of chemical reactions [16]. It is well-suited for chemical reaction optimization problems, for which the evaluation is expensive and noisy.

In this paper we address the problem of chemical reaction optimization with continuous and categorical variables.

We propose a Bayesian optimization method that uses a covariance function specifically designed for categorical and continuous variables and initially proposed by Ru et al. in the COCABO method [14].

We also experimentally compare different methods to optimize the acquisition function. We measure their performances in the optimization of multiple chemical reaction (or formulation) simulators.

We find that a brute-force approach for the optimization of the acquisition function offers the best results but is too slow when there are many categorical variables or categories. However we show that an ant colony optimization technique for the optimization of the acquisition function is a well-suited alternative when the brute-force approach cannot be (reasonably) used.

We show that the proposed Bayesian optimization algorithm finds optimal reaction parameters in fewer experiments than state of the art algorithms on our simulators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Carlson, R., Carlson, J.E.: Design and Optimization in Organic Synthesis. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christensen, M., et al.: Data-science driven autonomous process optimization. Commun. Chem. 4(1), 1–12 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Felton, K., Rittig, J., Lapkin, A.: Summit: benchmarking machine learning methods for reaction optimisation. Chem. Methods 1(2), 116–122 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garrido-Merchán, E.C., Hernández-Lobato, D.: Dealing with categorical and integer-valued variables in Bayesian Optimization with Gaussian processes. Neurocomputing 380, 20–35 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Häse, F., Aldeghi, M., Hickman, R.J., Roch, L.M., Aspuru-Guzik, A.: GRYFFIN: an algorithm for Bayesian optimization of categorical variables informed by expert knowledge. Appl. Phys. Rev. 8(3), 031406 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hutter, F., Hoos, H.H., Leyton-Brown, K.: Sequential model-based optimization for general algorithm configuration. In: Coello, C.A.C. (ed.) LION 2011. LNCS, vol. 6683, pp. 507–523. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25566-3_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Liao, T., Socha, K., de Oca, M.A.M., Stützle, T., Dorigo, M.: Ant colony optimization for mixed-variable optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18(4), 503–518 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindauer, M., et al.: SMAC3: a versatile Bayesian optimization package for hyperparameter optimization. arXiv: 2109.09831 (2021)

  9. Monden, T.: Polycarbonate resin composition (2019). EP2810989B1

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moore, K.W., Pechen, A., Feng, X.J., Dominy, J., Beltrani, V.J., Rabitz, H.: Why is chemical synthesis and property optimization easier than expected? Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13(21), 10048–10070 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Morgan, S.L., Deming, S.N.: Simplex optimization of analytical chemical methods. Anal. Chem. 46(9), 1170–1181 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rasmussen, C.E., Nickisch, H.: Gaussian processes for machine learning (GPML) toolbox. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 3011–3015 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Reizman, B.J., Wang, Y.M., Buchwald, S.L., Jensen, K.F.: Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling optimization enabled by automated feedback. React. Chem. Eng. 1(6), 658–666 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ru, B., Alvi, A., Nguyen, V., Osborne, M.A., Roberts, S.: Bayesian optimisation over multiple continuous and categorical inputs. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 8276–8285. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shahriari, B., Swersky, K., Wang, Z., Adams, R.P., De Freitas, N.: Taking the human out of the loop: a review of Bayesian optimization. Proc. IEEE 104(1), 148–175 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shields, B.J., et al.: Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis. Nature 590(7844), 89–96 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tibbetts, K.M., Feng, X.J., Rabitz, H.: Exploring experimental fitness landscapes for chemical synthesis and property optimization. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19(6), 4266–4287 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weissman, S.A., Anderson, N.G.: Design of experiments (DoE) and process optimization. A review of recent publications. Org. Process Res. Dev. 19(11), 1605–1633 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolpert, D.H., Macready, W.G., et al.: No free lunch theorems for search. Tech. rep., Technical Report SFI-TR-95-02-010, Santa Fe Institute (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wright, M.H., et al.: Nelder, Mead, and the other simplex method. Doc. Math. 7, 271–276 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiong, Q., Jutan, A.: Continuous optimization using a dynamic simplex method. Chem. Eng. Sci. 58(16), 3817–3828 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhan, D., Xing, H.: Expected improvement for expensive optimization: a review. J. Global Optim. 78(3), 507–544 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-020-00923-x

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou, Z., Li, X., Zare, R.N.: Optimizing chemical reactions with deep reinforcement learning. ACS Cent. Sci. 3(12), 1337–1344 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the R &D Booster SMAPI project 2020 of the Auvergne-Rhöne-Alpes Region.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theo Rabut .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rabut, T., Kheddouci, H., Galeandro-Diamant, T. (2022). Categorical-Continuous Bayesian Optimization Applied to Chemical Reactions. In: Dorronsoro, B., Pavone, M., Nakib, A., Talbi, EG. (eds) Optimization and Learning. OLA 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22039-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22039-5_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22038-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22039-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics