Skip to main content

Quantitative Ethnography of Policy Ecosystems: A Case Study on Climate Change Adaptation Planning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Quantitative Ethnography (ICQE 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1785))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Analysis of policy ecosystems can be challenging due to the volume of documentary and ethnographic data and the complexity of the interactions that define the ecology of such a system. This paper uses climate change adaptation policy as a case study with which to explore the potential for QE methods to model policy ecosystems. Specifically, it analyzes policies and draft policies constructed by three different categories of governmental entity—nations, state and local governments, and tribal governments or Indigenous communities—as well as guidance for policy makers produced by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and other international agencies, as a first step toward mapping the ecology of climate change adaptation policy. This case study is then used to reflect on the strengths of QE methods for analyzing policy ecosystems and areas of opportunity for further theoretical and methodological development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kirby, P., Shepherd, L.J.: Women, peace, and security: mapping the (Re)production of a policy ecosystem. J. Global Secur. Stud. 6(3), ogaa045 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stone, D.A.: Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Sci. Quart. 104, 281–300 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lipsky, M.: Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. Russell Sage Foundation (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois, V.: Critical Policy Ethnography. In: Fischer, F., Torgerson, D., Durnová, A., Orsini, M. (eds.) Handbook of Critical Policy Studies. pp. 462–480. Edward Elgar Publishing (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eagan, B.R., Siebert-Evenstone, A.L., Hamilton, E., Faul, M., Ashton, L., Wong, N.: Engaging Policy with a QE Lens. In: Wasson, B. and Zörgő, S. (eds.). In: Third International Conference on Quantitative Ethnography: Conference Proceedings Supplement, pp. 139–147. International Society for Quantitative Ethnography (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shaffer, D.W., Collier, W., Ruis, A.R.: A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. J. Learn. Anal. 3, 9–45 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowman, D., et al.: The Mathematical Foundations of Epistemic Network Analysis. In: Ruis, A.R., Lee, S.B. (eds.) ICQE 2021. CCIS, vol. 1312, pp. 91–105. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Marquart, C.L., Swiecki, Z., Eagan, B.R., Shaffer, D.W.: ncodeR: Techniques for Automated Classifiers. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marquart, C.L., Swiecki, Z., Collier, W., Eagan, B.R., Woodward, R., Shaffer, D.W.: rENA: Epistemic Network Analysis. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shaffer, D.W.: Quantitative Ethnography. Cathcart Press (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. de Sousa Santos, B.: Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Routledge (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Siebert-Evenstone, A.L., Irgens, G.A., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A.R., Shaffer, D.W.: In search of conversational grain size: modelling semantic structure using moving stanza windows. J. Learn. Anal. 4, 123–139 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruis, A.R., Siebert-Evenstone, A.L., Pozen, R., Eagan, B.R., Shaffer, D.W.: Finding Common Ground: A Method for Measuring Recent Temporal Context in Analyses of Complex, Collaborative Thinking. In: Lund, K., Niccolai, G., Lavoué, E., Hmelo-Silver, C., Gweon, G., and Baker, M. (eds.) A Wide Lens: Combining Embodied, Enactive, Extended, and Embedded Learning in Collaborative Settings: 13th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2019, pp. 136–143. In: International Society for the Learning Sciences (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zörgő, S., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A.R.: Exploring the Effects of Segmentation on Semi-structured Interview Data with Epistemic Network Analysis. In: Ruis, A.R., Lee, S.B. (eds.) ICQE 2021. CCIS, vol. 1312, pp. 78–90. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Wineburg, S.S.: Historical problem solving: a study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. J. Educ. Psychol. 83, 73–87 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shaffer, D.W., Ruis, A.R.: How We Code. In: Ruis, A.R., Lee, S.B. (eds.) ICQE 2021. CCIS, vol. 1312, pp. 62–77. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Nader, L.: Up the Anthropologist—Perspectives Gained From Studying Up. In: Hymes, D. (ed.) Reinventing Anthropology, pp. 284–311. Vintage Books (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peck, J., Theodore, N.: Follow the policy: a distended case approach. Environ. Plann. a: Econ. Space. 44, 21–30 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Siebert-Evenstone, A., Shaffer, D.W.: Cause and Because: Using Epistemic Network Analysis to Model Causality in the Next Generation Science Standards. In: Eagan, B., Misfeldt, M., Siebert-Evenstone, A. (eds.) ICQE 2019. CCIS, vol. 1112, pp. 223–233. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Schnaider, K., Schiavetto, S., Meier, F., Wasson, B., Allsopp, B.B., Spikol, D.: Governmental Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic - A Quantitative Ethnographic Comparison of Public Health Authorities’ Communication in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. In: Ruis, A.R., Lee, S.B. (eds.) ICQE 2021. CCIS, vol. 1312, pp. 406–421. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded in part by the National Science Foundation (DRL-1713110, DRL-2100320), the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, and the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. The opinions, findings, and conclusions do not reflect the views of the funding agencies, cooperating institutions, or other individuals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew R. Ruis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ruis, A.R. (2023). Quantitative Ethnography of Policy Ecosystems: A Case Study on Climate Change Adaptation Planning. In: Damşa, C., Barany, A. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1785. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31726-2_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31726-2_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-31725-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-31726-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics