Abstract
The history of the sciences can be (and has been) told in many ways. In general, however, treatments display systematic, recurring partialities. Many of the characters who contributed to them also wrote about music, and sure, the best approximation would be to say that all of them did. And yet the musical aspect, though present on a relatively continuous basis during the evolution of sciences, is usually ignored or underestimated. This omission would appear to be particularly serious, seeing that music would enable us to represent in a better and more characteristic way the main controversies at the basis of this history. For example, the question of the so-called irrational numbers, like \(\sqrt{ 2}\), may have a very simple, direct musical representation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Whorf 1970, p. 64.
- 2.
A good example of how one can limit one’s studies to problems of transmission, completely ignoring cultural differences and music, is offered by the great, in many ways fundamental classic, Otto Neugebauer 1970. This German scholar typically considers only astronomy as the leading science of the ancient world, and does not even remember that Ptolemy had also written a book about music; see Sect. 2.6.
- 3.
LĂ©vi-Strauss 2002, p. 10.
- 4.
Tonietti 2006a, pp. 175–179 e 197.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Basel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tonietti, T.M. (2014). Introduction. In: And Yet It Is Heard. Science Networks. Historical Studies, vol 46. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0672-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0672-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-0671-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-0672-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)