Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Pageoph Topical Volumes ((PTV))

  • 114 Accesses

Abstract

This second paper (Part 2) pertaining to optimized site-specific threshold monitoring addresses the application of the method to regions covered by a teleseismic or a combined regionalteleseismic network. In the first paper (Part 1) we developed the method for the general case, and demonstrated its application to an area well-covered by a regional network (the Novaya Zemlya nuclear test site). In the present paper, we apply the method to the Indian and Pakistani nuclear test sites, and show results during the periods of nuclear testing by these two countries in May 1998. Since the coverage by regional stations in these areas is poor, an optimized approach requires the use of selected, high-quality stations at teleseismic distances.

To optimize the threshold monitoring of these test sites, we use as calibration events either one of the nuclear explosions or a nearby earthquake. From analysis of the calibration events we derive values for array beamforming steering delays, filter bands, short-term averages (STA) lengths, phase travel times (P waves), and amplitude-magnitude relationships for each station. By applying these parameters, we obtain a monitoring capability of both test sites ranging form mb 2.8–3.0 using teleseismic stations only. When including the nearby Nilore station to monitor the Indian tests, we show that the threshold can be reduced by about 0.4 magnitude units. In particular, we demonstrate that the Indian tests on 13 May, 1998, which ere not detected by any known seismic station, must have corresponded to a magnitude (mb) of less than 2.4.

We also discuss the effect of a nearby aftershock sequence on the monitoring capability for the Pakistani test sites. Such an aftershock sequence occurred in fact on the day of the last Pakistani test (30 May, 1998), following a large (mb 5.5) earthquake in Afghanistan located about 1100 km from the test site. We show that the threshold monitoring technique has sufficient resolution to suppress the signals from these interfering aftershocks without significantly affecting the true peak of the nuclear explosion on the threshold trace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barker, B., Clark, M., Davis, P., Fisk, M., Hedlin, M., Israelsson, H., Khalturin, V., Kim, W.-Y., Mclaughlin, K., Meade, C., Murphy, J., North, R., Orcutt, J., Powell, C., Richards, P. G., Stead, R., Stevens, J., Vernon, F., and Wallace, T. (1998),Monitoring Nuclear Tests Science281, 1967–1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kværna, T. and Ringdal, F. (1999),Seismic Threshold Monitoring for Continuous Assessment of Global Detection Capability, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.89(4), 946–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringdal, F. (1994),GSETT-3: A Test of an Experimental International Seismic Monitoring System,Annali Geofis.37, 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringdal, F. and Kværna, T. (1992), Continuous Seismic Threshold Monitoring, Geophys. J. Int. 111, 505–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, J., Ringdal, F., and Fyen, J. (1998),The Indian Nuclear Explosions of 11 and 13 May,1998, Semiannual Tech. Summ., 1 October 1997–31 March 1998, NORSAR Sci. Rep. 2–97/98, 121–130, NORSAR, Kjeller, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, T. C. (1998),The May 1998 Indian and Pakistan Nuclear Tests, Seism. Res. Lett.69(5), 386–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kværna, T., Ringdal, F., Schweitzer, J., Taylor, L. (2002). Optimized Seismic Threshold Monitoring — Part 2: Teleseismic Processing. In: Der, Z.A., Shumway, R.H., Herrin, E.T. (eds) Monitoring the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Data Processing and Infrasound. Pageoph Topical Volumes. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8144-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8144-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-6676-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8144-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics