Skip to main content

Risk Assessment of Low Dose Exposure to Carcinogens

  • Conference paper
Statistics in Genetics and in the Environmental Sciences

Part of the book series: Trends in Mathematics ((TM))

  • 329 Accesses

Abstract

To assess the risk to the public from lifetime exposures to very low levels of carcinogens, federal agencies routinely model dose-response relationships and estimate the exposure levels that are likely to be “virtually safe”. The data for these purposes comes from animal bioassays which use much higher dose levels than those to which humans are exposed in the environment. The big problem is how to best estimate the dose-response curve at the very low dose levels. In this paper, I introduce a new framework to the problem which takes advantage of the fact that various dose-response curves differ in their inherent risk mechanisms. Within the framework, a new justification is given to the default model used by federal agencies. A new model, which complements the default model, has a similar justification. Together, they greatly improve risk/benefit analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, W. S. (1925). A method of computing the effectivness of an insecticide. J., Econ. Entomol., 18:265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, P. and Doll, R. (1961). Stochastic models for carcinogenesis. In Ney-man, J., editor, Proceeding of the Fouth Berekely Symposium in Mathematical Statistics and Probability, volume 4, pages 19-38. University of California Press. Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornfield, J. (1977). Carcinogenic risk assessment. Science,198:693-699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crump, K. S. (1996). The linearized multistage model and the future of quan-titative risk assessment. Human Experimental Toxicology, 15:787-798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  •  Crump, K. S., Hoel, D., Langley, C., and Peto, R. (1976). Fundamental carcino-genic processes and their implications for low-dose risk assessment. CancerResearch, 36:2973-2979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food Safty Council (1980). Quantitative risk assessment. Food eY Cosmetics Toxicology, 18:711-734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fygenson, M. (1997). A new approach in modeling categorical response. i. binarycase. Journal of the American Statistical Association,92:322-332.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fygenson, M. (1999). Virtually safe dose: A new framework. Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaylor, D. W. (1979). The ED01 study: Summary and conclusions. In Staffa,J. A. and Mehlman, M. A., editors, Innovations in Cancer Risk Assessment(EDO1 Study), pages 179-186. International Toxicology Books, Kingston, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaylor, D. W. and Kodell, R. L. (1980). Linear interpolation algorithm for low-dose risk assessment of toxic substances. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol., 4:305-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. L., David, K. S., Hansen, W. H., and Charles, R. (1975). Effects of prolonged ethylene thiourea ingestion on the thyroid of rates. Food Cosmet. Toxicol., 13:493-499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, D. G. et al (1975). Estimation of risk in irreversible, delayed toxicity. Journal Toxicol. Environ. Health, 1:133-151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krewski, D. and Van Ryzin, J. (1981). Dose-response models for quantal response toxicity data. In Statistics and Related Topics, pages 201-230. North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, N. and Bryan, W. (1961). Safety testing of carcinogenic agents. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 27:455-470.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences (1983). Risk assessment in the federal government:Managing the process. Technical report, NAC, Washington, DC.Rai, K. and Van Ryzin, J. (1981). A generalized multi-hit dose response modelfor low dose extrapolation. Biometrics, 37:321-326.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1996). Proposed guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. Technical report, Office of Research and Development. EPA/600/P-92003C, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (1987). Sponsored compounds in food-producing animals: criteria and procedures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ryzin, J. (1980). Quantitative risk assessment. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 22:321-326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Basel AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fygenson, M. (2001). Risk Assessment of Low Dose Exposure to Carcinogens. In: Fernholz, L.T., Morgenthaler, S., Stahel, W. (eds) Statistics in Genetics and in the Environmental Sciences. Trends in Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8326-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8326-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9518-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8326-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics